{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Organization", "name": "Brainscape", "url": "https://www.brainscape.com/", "logo": "https://www.brainscape.com/pks/images/cms/public-views/shared/Brainscape-logo-c4e172b280b4616f7fda.svg", "sameAs": [ "https://www.facebook.com/Brainscape", "https://x.com/brainscape", "https://www.linkedin.com/company/brainscape", "https://www.instagram.com/brainscape/", "https://www.tiktok.com/@brainscapeu", "https://www.pinterest.com/brainscape/", "https://www.youtube.com/@BrainscapeNY" ], "contactPoint": { "@type": "ContactPoint", "telephone": "(929) 334-4005", "contactType": "customer service", "availableLanguage": ["English"] }, "founder": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Andrew Cohen" }, "description": "Brainscape’s spaced repetition system is proven to DOUBLE learning results! Find, make, and study flashcards online or in our mobile app. Serious learners only.", "address": { "@type": "PostalAddress", "streetAddress": "159 W 25th St, Ste 517", "addressLocality": "New York", "addressRegion": "NY", "postalCode": "10001", "addressCountry": "USA" } }

Procedural Fairness Flashcards

(57 cards)

1
Q

What section of the Constitution guarantees the right to lawful, reasonable, and procedurally fair administrative action?

A

Section 33(1) of the 1996 Constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does Section 33(2) of the Constitution provide?

A

The right to be given written reasons when rights are adversely affected by administrative action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which three legal sources determine the content of the right to procedural fairness?

A

Common law, PAJA, and judicial decisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the two key common law principles of natural justice?

A

Audi alteram partem (hear the other side) and nemo iudex in sua causa (no one may be a judge in his own cause).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does audi alteram partem ensure in administrative procedures?

A

Opportunity to be heard, notice, legal representation, evidence, cross-examination, and public hearing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does nemo iudex in sua causa prohibit?

A

Bias, partiality, or prejudice in decision-making.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which PAJA section addresses bias in administrative action?

A

Section 6(2)(a)(iii).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which PAJA section codifies the audi alteram partem rule for individuals?

A

Section 3.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which PAJA section deals with public participation (audi rule for the public)?

A

Section 4.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which PAJA section gives individuals the right to written reasons for administrative decisions?

A

Section 5.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When does PAJA not apply to a power?

A

When the power exercised is private in nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are three core components of the audi alteram partem principle?

A
  1. Opportunity to be heard
  2. Proper notice
  3. Right to be informed of opposing considerations.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are six elements of the opportunity to be heard?

A
  1. Proper notice
  2. Reasonable and timely notice
  3. Personal appearance
  4. Legal representation
  5. Evidence/cross-examination
  6. Public hearing.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is there an absolute right to legal representation under PAJA?

A

No, it’s at the discretion of the administrator under Section 3(3)(a).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Must an individual be informed of the policy relied upon in decision-making?

A

Yes, failure to do so is administratively unfair.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does Section 3(3) of PAJA provide regarding appearance and representation?

A

Allows for oral or written submissions and discretionary legal representation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Does common law guarantee a public hearing?

A

No, but openness, transparency, and fairness are emphasized.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What did the court hold in Turner v Jockey Club regarding timely notice?

A

That more serious or complex issues require longer, reasonable notice to ensure fairness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is a key difference between common law and PAJA regarding procedural fairness?

A

Common law applies to private powers, while PAJA only applies when public powers are exercised.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Does PAJA apply to disciplinary actions by domestic tribunals?

A

No, because these exercises of power are considered private in nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Under common law, are public hearings guaranteed in administrative processes?

A

No, there is no absolute right, but transparency and openness are valued.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Under PAJA, when can legal representation be requested?

A

Where the nature of the hearing requires it for fairness, and the administrator has discretion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What section of the Constitution guarantees the right to lawful, reasonable, and procedurally fair administrative action?

A

Section 33(1) of the 1996 Constitution.

24
Q

What does Section 33(2) of the Constitution provide?

A

The right to be given written reasons when rights are adversely affected by administrative action.

25
Which three legal sources determine the content of the right to procedural fairness?
Common law, PAJA, and judicial decisions.
26
What are the two key common law principles of natural justice?
Audi alteram partem (hear the other side) and nemo iudex in sua causa (no one may be a judge in his own cause).
27
What does audi alteram partem ensure in administrative procedures?
Opportunity to be heard, notice, legal representation, evidence, cross-examination, and public hearing.
28
What does nemo iudex in sua causa prohibit?
Bias, partiality, or prejudice in decision-making.
29
Which PAJA section addresses bias in administrative action?
Section 6(2)(a)(iii).
30
Which PAJA section codifies the audi alteram partem rule for individuals?
Section 3.
31
Which PAJA section deals with public participation (audi rule for the public)?
Section 4.
32
Which PAJA section gives individuals the right to written reasons for administrative decisions?
Section 5.
33
When does PAJA not apply to a power?
When the power exercised is private in nature.
34
What are three core components of the audi alteram partem principle?
1. Opportunity to be heard 2. Proper notice 3. Right to be informed of opposing considerations.
35
What are six elements of the opportunity to be heard?
1. Proper notice 2. Reasonable and timely notice 3. Personal appearance 4. Legal representation 5. Evidence/cross-examination 6. Public hearing.
36
Is there an absolute right to legal representation under PAJA?
No, it's at the discretion of the administrator under Section 3(3)(a).
37
Must an individual be informed of the policy relied upon in decision-making?
Yes, failure to do so is administratively unfair.
38
What does Section 3(3) of PAJA provide regarding appearance and representation?
Allows for oral or written submissions and discretionary legal representation.
39
Does common law guarantee a public hearing?
No, but openness, transparency, and fairness are emphasized.
40
What did the court hold in Turner v Jockey Club regarding timely notice?
That more serious or complex issues require longer, reasonable notice to ensure fairness.
41
What is a key difference between common law and PAJA regarding procedural fairness?
Common law applies to private powers, while PAJA only applies when public powers are exercised.
42
Does PAJA apply to disciplinary actions by domestic tribunals?
No, because these exercises of power are considered private in nature.
43
Under common law, are public hearings guaranteed in administrative processes?
No, there is no absolute right, but transparency and openness are valued.
44
Under PAJA, when can legal representation be requested?
Where the nature of the hearing requires it for fairness, and the administrator has discretion.
45
What section of the 1996 Constitution provides for the right to written reasons?
Section 33(2): Everyone whose rights have been adversely affected by administrative action has the right to written reasons.
46
What does PAJA section 5(1) provide?
Anyone whose rights have been materially and adversely affected by administrative action may request written reasons within 90 days.
47
Which case confirmed that a tenderer is entitled to reasons for rejection under PAJA?
JFE Sapela Electronics v Chairperson: Standing Tender Committee.
48
What did the court hold in SA Youth Movement v Minister of Forestry?
A pre-award letter rejecting a tender was administrative action, and reasons were required under s 5 of PAJA.
49
What is meant by 'reasons' in administrative law?
The explanation for a decision.
50
What are 'findings' in administrative law?
Findings of fact or law; essential background but not necessarily a full explanation.
51
What is the difference between 'information' and 'evidence'?
Information = often findings; Evidence = documentary or oral proof submitted to administrator.
52
According to Baxter, why must administrators give reasons?
To rationalise decisions, satisfy the individual, allow scrutiny/appeal, and promote fairness and public trust.
53
What purpose of reasons was emphasized in Commonwealth v Pharmacy Guild of Australia?
Disclosure of the tribunal’s reasoning builds public confidence and imposes intellectual discipline.
54
What did the court say about 'adequate' reasons in Phambili Fisheries?
They must clearly explain the decision-maker’s reasoning, relevant facts, and applicable law.
55
What did the court rule in Maimela about adequacy?
Reasons must be intelligible and informative in their context; even brief pro forma reasons may suffice.
56
Must reasons be written in legal language or formal style?
No, they must be clear, unambiguous, and understandable.
57
What did the court rule in Nkuna v SAPS?
SAPS was ordered to provide reasons for rejecting a promotion application; reasons are a constitutional right.