Process Of Assurance: Evidence And Reporting Flashcards

1
Q

ISA (UK) 500: Evidence must me…

A
  1. Sufficient (quantity)
  2. Appropriate (quality)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sufficient evidence depends on factors like…

A

Risk
Materiality
Level of assurance to be given

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Appropriate evidence factors

A
  1. Reliability
  2. Relevance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reliable evidence two factors

A
  1. Source
  2. Format
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Relevant evidence

A

Proves a FS assertion

Or multiple

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ISA (UK) 315 financial statement assertions about classes of transactions and events, and related disclosures, for the period under audit

A
  1. Occurrence
  2. Completeness
  3. Accuracy
  4. Cut-off
  5. Classification
  6. Presentation

Related to transactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Occurrence

A

Transactions that have been recorded:

Have occurred
Pertain to the entity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Completeness

A

All transactions have been recorded
(That should have been recorded)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Accuracy

A

Amounts recorded APPROPRIATELY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cut-off

A

Recorded in correct accounting period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Classification

A

Recorded in proper accounts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Presentation

A

Transactions and events:
1. Appropriately aggregated
2. Clearly described

Related disclosures are:
1. relevant
2. understandable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ISA (UK) 315 assertions about account balances and related disclosures, at the period end

A
  1. Existence
  2. Rights and obligations
  3. Completeness
  4. Accuracy, valuation and allocation
  5. Classification
  6. Presentation

Related to assets, liabilities and equity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Existence

A

Assets, liabilities and equity interest exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rights and obligations

A

The entity owns the assets
The liabilities are the entity’s obligations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Audit approach: two types of test

A
  1. Tests of control
  2. Substantive testing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Tests of control

A

Testing the system that gets the numbers into the financial statements

18
Q

Tests of control procedures include

A

Enquiry

Observation

Reperformance

Data analytics

19
Q

When are Tests of control appropriate

A

When control risk is low

Tests of control more efficient to gather evidence

20
Q

Why can’t the auditor just carry out tests of control?

A

Inherent limitations of controls

21
Q

Substantive testing

A

Test the numbers in the financial statements

22
Q

Substantive procedures include

A

Analytical procedures

Tests of detail

23
Q

When must substantive procedures must always be carried out?

A

On material items

24
Q

Testing: Step one

A

Preliminary assessment of internal controls, including walkthrough tests

25
Preliminary assessment of internal controls, including walkthrough tests: Question
Do you expect controls to be effective?
26
What to do if controls expected to be effective?
Tests of controls
27
What to do if controls aren’t expected to be effective?
Substantive testing
28
What to do if tests of controls found to be effective?
Limited substantive testing
29
Evaluating results: Basic criteria
1. Relevant 2. Reliable E.g. doubts over management integrity discrepancies between evidence sources 3. Sufficient
30
Relevance
Audit evidence supporting all FS assertions for a given account balance
31
What to do if evidence not sufficient?
Attempt to find further evidence Consider implications for the audit opinion
32
Express auditor opinions
1. Opinions on FS 2. Opinions on other matters prescribed by CA06 Must always be stated
33
Opinions on FS
1. True and fair 2. Properly prepared in accordance with CA06/Standards
34
Opinion on other matters prescribed by CA06
Info in D’s report and strategic report consistent with FS
35
Implied opinions only required when
Material problem arises (Though best practice to mention regardless)
36
Implied opinions matters:
1. Returns: Adequate for audit not received from branches not visited 2. Accounts: Don’t agree to underlying accounting records 3. Proper: (Adequate) accounting records not kept 4. Information: And explanations required for audit not received 5. Directors’ remuneration: Disclosures required by law not made
37
Auditor’s report format
Title Adresse Auditors opinion on FS Basis for opinion Going concern Key audit matters (listed Cs) Other information Management responsibilities Auditor responsibilities Explanation of extent audit capable of detecting irregularities (incl fraud) Opinion on other matters E.g. whether D’s R and SR consistent with FS Matters on which the auditor is required to report on by exception under CA Name and signature of engagement partner Auditor’s address Date of report
38
When will auditor’s report wording need to be modified?
1. Material misstatements 2. Insufficient appropriate evidence
39
UK Governance code Key Audit Matters sections
{Rubbish Audit Matters Sections} 1. Assessment of RISKS of material misstatement 2. APPLICATION of MATERIALITY 3. Overview of SCOPE
40
One benefit of longer-form auditors reports?
Closing expectations gap
41
Non-audit assurance report (ISAES/ISREs) sections
Title Addressee Identification and description of subject matter Identification of criteria Inherent limitations Restrictions upon purpose/user Identifying responsible party Work performed in accordance with relevant standards Summary of work Conclusion Date Name of firm/practitioner