Professional Conduct MCQS Flashcards
Identify whether the following scenario indicates a high or low risk of money laundering:
Your client, a British national, is purchasing a flat for his daughter. He deposits £500,000 in your firm’s client account for the purchase from a bank account in Bermuda. The next day he rings you to inform you that the purchase is not going ahead. He asks you to transfer the £500,000 to his wife’s bank account in the Cayman Islands
A) Low risk. Neither Bermuda nor the Cayman Islands are on the FATF list of countries with a high risk of money laundering.
B) High risk, because the client’s deposit came from an offshore bank account in a tax haven, the transaction has been cancelled at short notice and the client is asking you to transfer the money to a different account, also offshore in a different tax haven
C) High risk because Bermuda and the Cayman Islands are on the European Commission’s list of high risk jurisdictions.
B) High risk, because the client’s deposit came from an offshore bank account in a tax haven, the transaction has been cancelled at short notice and the client is asking you to transfer the money to a different account, also offshore in a different tax haven
(Correct. There are a number of risk factors here which should alert you to the high risk of money laundering. The client has deposited a large sum of money in cash in your firm’s account. The money came from an offshore bank account in a tax haven. The transaction has been cancelled at short notice and the client is asking you to transfer the money to a different account, also offshore in a different tax haven.)
Identify whether the following scenario indicates a high or low risk of money laundering:
Your client, a French national, living in the UK is setting up a trust for her grandchildren. She plans to invest £50,000 in the trust over the course of two years.
A) High risk because the client is investing a large sum of money in a trust which is a suspicious area of activity because it could be a vehicle for money laundering
B) High risk because although the client is a French national, she is setting up a trust in the UK
C) Low risk because France is not a high risk country and there appears to be a legitimate reason for the client to set up the trust
C) Low risk because France is not a high risk country and there appears to be a legitimate reason for the client to set up the trust
(Correct. A client setting up a trust, does have the potential to be a vehicle for money laundering and you will need to carry out customer due diligence on the client, as you will see later in this topic. However there is nothing to suggest a high risk of money laundering here, France is not a high risk country and there appears to be a legitimate reason for the client to set up the trust)
Identify whether the following scenario indicates a high or low risk of money laundering:
Your client, a South African national, has instructed you on a litigation claim and asked you to commence proceedings against her neighbour. The neighbour contacts you and wants to pay £100,000 into your firm’s client account to settle the matter.
A) High risk because the dispute being settled early is an indicator that the litigation might be a sham. Also the other party is seeking to pay a large sum of money into your firm’s bank account
B) High risk because South Africa is on the European Commission’s list of high risk jurisdictions
C) Low risk because litigation is not a high risk activity from a money laundering perspective
A) High risk because the dispute being settled early is an indicator that the litigation might be a sham. Also the other party is seeking to pay a large sum of money into your firm’s bank account
(Correct. There are a number of risk factors here which should alert you to the high risk of money laundering. A dispute being settled early and easily should alert you to the risk of this being a sham litigation, and the other party seeking to pay a large sum of money into your firm’s account is another warning sign. South Africa is not on the list of high risk countries, but there are enough other factors here to indicate a high risk of money laundering)
Which ONE of the following activities does NOT fall within the definition of ‘regulated sector’ in Schedule 9 of PoCA?
A) Advising a client on the purchase of a property
B) Advising a client on setting up a trust for their grandchildren
C) Advising a client on an employment dispute
C) Advising a client on an employment dispute
(Correct. ‘Regulated sector’ as defined in Schedule 9 PoCA includes “participating in financial and real property transactions concerning:
the buying and selling of real property or business entities
the managing of client money, securities or other assets,
the opening or management of bank, savings or securities accounts;
the organisation of contributions necessary for the creation, operation and management of companies;
the creation, operation or management of trusts, companies or similar structures
Advising a client on the purchase of a property and on setting up a trust would fall within participating in financial and real property transactions. However advising on litigation matters (including an employment dispute) does not fall within the definition of regulated sector, as set out in Schedule 9)
You are an apprentice in the property department of a law firm and you are contacted by a new client who has never instructed the firm before. The client contacts you directly asking for details of the firm’s client account. He wants to send the sum of £6,000,000 from an account in Bermuda to the firm’s client account in readiness for a quick completion of his purchase of a property in London, on which he is just about to instruct the firm (the ‘Purchase’). He insists that he wants you to act personally on the purchase.
You explain to the Client that you are not able to give the Client the firm’s client account details. The Client tells you he will call in at the office tomorrow and he wants you to give him the firm’s client account details then.
Which ONE of the following statements is CORRECT?
A) When the Client arrives at the office, you should not give him the client account details, but tell him that you have reported the matter to the MLRO (money laundering reporting officer) because you suspect money laundering
B) You should meet the Client and give him the account details. There are no grounds for suspicion here as it is not unusual for a property in London to cost £6,000,000
C) You should meet the Client and give him the client account details – so as not to arouse suspicion
D) You should immediately make a disclosure to the firm’s MLRO (money laundering reporting officer) under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (‘PoCA’) that you suspect the money is criminal property. You must wait to receive appropriate consent from the MLRO before carrying out the Client’s instructions
D) You should immediately make a disclosure to the firm’s MLRO (money laundering reporting officer) under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (‘PoCA’) that you suspect the money is criminal property. You must wait to receive appropriate consent from the MLRO before carrying out the Client’s instructions
(Correct. There are a number of risk factors here which should alert you to the risk of the Client attempting to launder money, notably: the client is new to your firm and has sent a large amount of money (£6 million) in cash to your firm’s client account, the client wants the transaction to complete quickly and he wants you (an inexperienced apprentice) to act personally on the transaction.
If you carry out the Client’s instruction you are at risk of committing an offence under s. 327 (transferring criminal property), s. 328 (becoming concerned in an arrangement which facilitates the acquisition…use or control of criminal property) and/or s. 329 PoCA (acquires, uses or has possession of criminal property).
You will also commit an offence under s. 330 PoCA if you fail to disclose your suspicion to the firm’s nominated officer. You should not take further action until you receive appropriate consent from the MLRO, s. 327(2)(a), s. 328(2)(a) PoCA.
You should be careful that you do not commit the offence of tipping off the client under s. 333A PoCA)
Xavier Gaston is a French national. He has never instructed Price Prior before, where you are currently an apprentice in the corporate department. Xavier has sent the sum of £2,000,000 from an account in Jersey to Price Prior’s client account in readiness for a quick completion of his acquisition of all the shares in FWL (Retail) Ltd, which he is just about to instruct you on (the ‘Acquisition’). Xavier insists that he wants you to act personally on the deal.
If you proceed with Xavier’s instructions and complete the Acquisition WITHOUT making an authorised disclosure to Price Prior’s MLRO, which ONE of the following statements is CORRECT in relation to offences that you have committed under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (‘PoCA’)?
A) You are likely to have committed an offence under sections 329 and 330 PoCA
B) You are not likely to have committed an offence under PoCA
C) You are likely to have committed a direct involvement offence under section 329 PoCA, but not a non-direct involvement offence because you are not working in the regulated sector
D) You are likely to have committed an offence under section 333A PoCA.
A) You are likely to have committed an offence under sections 329 and 330 PoCA
(Correct. There are a number of risk factors here which should alert you to the risk of Xavier attempting to launder money, notably: the client is new to your firm and has sent a large amount of money (£2 million) in cash to your firm’s client account, the client wants the transaction to complete quickly and he wants you (an inexperienced apprentice) to act personally on the transaction.
If it is later discovered that the Acquisition was part of a money laundering operation, you will have had possession of criminal property (the proceeds of crime) so you are likely to have committed an offence under s. 329 PoCA 2002.
In addition, you will have committed an offence under s. 330 PoCA 2002 because there is sufficient grounds for you to suspect that Xavier is engaged in money laundering, for the reasons set out above. Under s. 330 PoCA 2002 it is an offence for someone practising in the regulated sector (which you are, as you are involved in buying a business entity) not to make a disclosure to your firm’s MLRO. You are practising in the regulated sector because you are buying a business entity which falls within the definition of “participating in financial and real property transactions concerning: the buying and selling of real property or business entities”.
You will not have committed an offence under s. 333A PoCA 2002 because you have not done anything to tip Xavier off to the fact that you suspect he may be attempting to launder money)
Identify whether the following scenario requires standard CDD, enhanced CDD or ongoing monitoring:
You have been instructed by a company Autolext Corporation (‘Autolext’) on the purchase of 60% of the shares in a data analytics company, Data Inc for £2 million. Data Inc is registered in the Cayman Islands. Autolext is registered in Bermuda and has a majority shareholder who is Iranian. Autolext has asked to you set up a wholly owned subsidiary, Autolext Data Limited which will be the vehicle that purchases the shares in the Data Inc. Autotext will pay cash for the shares.
A) Standard CDD
B) Enhanced CDD
C) Ongoing monitoring
B) Enhanced CDD
(Correct. There are a number of factors that suggest that there is a high risk of money laundering in this scenario. The client is registered in Bermuda, an off-shore tax haven, and its majority shareholder is from a high risk country, Iran. The value of the transaction is high and is being funded in cash. The client is also asking you to establish a subsidiary for the sole purpose of purchasing the shares, which could indicate a transaction that is unusually complex with no apparent purpose. The target is also registered in an off-shore tax haven, the Cayman Islands. You would need to make further enquiries to satisfy yourself as to the source of the £2 million, the identity of the majority shareholder and that the transaction is genuine)
Identify whether the following scenario requires standard CDD, enhanced CDD or ongoing monitoring:
Plaza Properties Limited is a private limited company and an existing client of your firm and regularly instructs you on the acquisition and sale of properties in its portfolio. You have received a new instruction to act for it on the acquisition of the freehold of an office building near Maidenhead for £10 million. Part of the acquisition is funded by a loan.
A) Standard CDD
B) Ongoing monitoring
C) Enhanced CDD
B) Ongoing monitoring
(Correct. This is an existing client whom the firm acts for on a regular basis. The firm will already have carried out CDD on the client. The firm will need to carry out ongoing monitoring, by checking that the transaction is consistent with the firm’s knowledge of the client and checking at regular intervals that the identification documents it holds for the client are up to date. There is nothing on these facts to suggest that this client present a high risk of money laundering)
Identify whether the following scenario requires standard CDD, enhanced CDD or ongoing monitoring:
Your client, a British national, is purchasing a flat for her daughter for a price of £750,000. She is funding 50% of the purchase in cash from the sale of some shares, and 50% by a mortgage with a high street bank. You have not acted for the client before and you expect that this will be a one-off transaction for the client.
A) Ongoing monitoring
B) Standard CDD
C) Enhanced CDD
B) Standard CDD
(Correct. There is nothing on these facts to suggest that this client present a high risk of money laundering. The is not from a high risk country and is funding 50% of the purchase through a mortgage. As this is a one-off transaction, it will be an occasional transaction and you should obtain standard CDD on the client before you start working for her)
You are a solicitor in the corporate department of Price Prior. Your client wishes to buy 50% of the shares in a company as an investment. Your client has instructed you to advise her on the acquisition (including on the merits).
Which one of the following statements is correct regarding authorisation under FSMA?
A) There is a specific exclusion relating to advising on the merits that will allow you to act
B) FSMA does apply and you will need to be authorised by the FCA to act for the client on the acquisition
C) You will not need to be authorised by the FCA to act for the client because acting for a client who is acquiring shares in a company is not a specified activity under Article 53(1) RAO
D) Shares are not a specified investment, therefore FSMA does not apply
E) You will not need to be authorised by the FCA to act for the client because your advice will be excluded from FSMA under Article 70 RAO
E) You will not need to be authorised by the FCA to act for the client because your advice will be excluded from FSMA under Article 70 RAO
Which one of the following would not be classified as financial services and therefore not be regulated under FSMA?
A) Arranging investment products on behalf of clients
B) Dealing in investment products on behalf of clients
C) Advising on the acquisition of a business
D) Advising on investment products on behalf of clients
C) Advising on the acquisition of a business
You recently acted for a client in connection with the sale of his personal training business and that sale has now concluded.
The client tells you that following the sale, he now has £50,000 cash and he would like some advice about how to invest this money, specifically whether he should buy shares in XYZ Plc. He wants to know whether shares are generally a good investment at the moment and, in particular, whether or not he should buy the shares in XYZ.
Which one of the following statements is correct in relation to the above scenario?
A) The advice is not likely to be incidental under s 327 FSMA
B) The advice is likely to be complementary under Scope Rule 2
C) You would be able to give the client generic advice on the rights attaching to shares because this advice does not fall within Article 53(1) RAO
D) It is likely that Article 67 of the Financial Services and Markets Act (Regulated Activities) Order 2001 (‘RAO’) would apply to your advice
E) You would be free to advise about the merits of the shares in XYZ Ltd because you could rely on the exclusion under Art 70 RAO
C) You would be able to give the client generic advice on the rights attaching to shares because this advice does not fall within Article 53(1) RAO
Which of the following is not a key part of the criminal justice process as discussed in this element?
A) Appeal
B) Trial
C) Plea
D) Arrest
E) The prevention of crime
E) The prevention of crime
(Correct. The key elements of the criminal justice process discussed in this element were: arrest/ requisition, plea, trial, sentencing and appeals. The prevention of crime is more of a matter for criminology studies but does become a factor when sentencing someone found guilty of a crime)
All of the following bodies can bring prosecutions. However, which of the following is the main body which brings prosecutions in England and Wales?
A) Transport for London
B) Health and safety executive
C) Crown Prosecution Service
D) Railway operators
E) Private individuals
C) Crown Prosecution Service
(Correct. Other bodies such as Transport for London, railway operators and the Health and Safety Executive prosecute their own matters. Private individuals can bring prosecutions too but the CPS has the right to intervene and take over such cases)
What is the main statute that governs police conduct in criminal investigations?
A) Police Powers Act 1984
B) Governance of Police Powers Act 1984
C) Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
C) Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
(Correct. Commonly known as ‘PACE’ which is accompanied by Codes of Practice)
What does trial on indictment mean?
A) Trial by jury in the Crown Court
B) Trial by magistrates in a magistrates’ court
C) Trial by jury in a magistrates’ court
A) Trial by jury in the Crown Court
(Correct. Either-way offences and indictable only offences can be heard before a jury)
What are the three classifications of offences?
A) Property offences, fatal offences and non-fatal offences against the person
B) Low, medium and high
C) Summary, either-way and indictable only
C) Summary, either-way and indictable only
(Correct. Either-way offences are also known as ‘indictable’ as they are capable of being tried on indictment)
If the statute provides a maximum penalty on summary conviction but does not provide for a penalty on conviction on indictment, what type of offence is it?
A) Summary offence
B) Indictable offence
C) Either-way offence
A) Summary offence
(Correct. Reading the statute is one of the ways to determine the classification of an offence)
If the statute provides one penalty for summary conviction and a different one for conviction on indictment, what type of offence is it?
A) Indictable only
B) Summary
C) Either-way
C) Either-way
(Correct. A close reading of the statute is one way to tell whether an offence is either-way. An offence can also be either-way if listed in Schedule 1, Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980)
If the statute provides only for a penalty on conviction on indictment or is a common-law offence what type of offence is it?
A) Indictable-only
B) Summary
C) Either-way
A) Indictable-only
(Correct. Reading the statute and knowledge of the common-law offences helps determine the classification of offences)
What is the function of a jury in a Crown Court trial?
A) Tribunal of law
B) Tribunal of fact
C) Sums up the case
B) Tribunal of fact
(Correct. There are certain circumstances in which the judge may also act as a tribunal of fact such as when hearing a submission of no case to answer, a voir dire or a Newton hearing which will be considered in separate elements)
How are the roles of tribunal of fact and tribunal of law dealt with in the magistrates’ court?
A) The magistrates are the tribunal of fact and tribunal of law
B) The magistrates are the tribunal of fact and the legal advisor is the tribunal of law
C) The magistrates are the tribunal of law, there is no tribunal of fact
A) The magistrates are the tribunal of fact and tribunal of law
(Correct. This is arguably an unsatisfactory position when the magistrates make a ruling of law that certain evidence is inadmissible but hear the evidence in order to make that decision. In contrast, in the Crown court it would be the judge that would make a ruling of law that certain evidence is inadmissible and the jury would never hear the evidence)
How many Crown Courts are there in England and Wales?
A) 10-19
B) One
C) Less than 10
D) More than 20
B) One
(Correct. The Crown Court is regarded as a single court that sits in different places)
Which judges can sit in a summary trial?
A) Lay justices, District Judges or Deputy District Judges
B) Lay justices or District Judges
C) District Judges
D) Lay justices
A) Lay justices, District Judges or Deputy District Judges
(Correct. Lay justices (also known as Justices of the Peace), District Judges (a salaried judge) or a Deputy District Judge (a solicitor or barrister with a part-time judicial post) can conduct trials in the magistrates’ court)