Promoting and Assessing Critical Thinking Flashcards

1
Q

The ability to discern judgment based on standards.

A

Critical Thinking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2 Greek words where
Critical Thinking is derived from:

A

-kriticos (discerning judgement)
-criterion (standards)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 phases of Critical Thinking:

A
  1. It analyzes thinking
  2. It evaluates thinking
  3. It improves thinking
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

True or False

3 phases of Critical Thinking

It evaluates thinking:
By focusing on the parts of thinking in any situation

A

False

It analyzes thinking :
By focusing on the parts of thinking in any situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

True or False

3 phases of Critical Thinking

It evaluates thinking:
By figuring out its goodness and badness

A

False
It evaluates thinking :
By figuring out its strengths and weaknesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

3 phases of Critical Thinking

________________________:
By building on its strengths while reducing its weaknesses

A

It improves thinking :
By building on its strengths while reducing its weaknesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Critical thinking has three dimensions:
1.
2.
3.

A

Critical thinking has three dimensions:
1. an analytic
2. an evaluative
3. a creative component

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

True or False:

As critical thinkers, we evaluate thinking in order to analyze it. We evaluate it in order to improve it.

A

False

As critical thinkers, we analyze thinking in order to evaluate it. We
evaluate it in order to improve it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

To analyze thinking,
identify its 8 components:

A

To analyze thinking:
Identify its:
1. Purpose
2. Question
3. Information
4. Conclusion(s)
5. Assumptions
6. Implications
7. Main concept(s)
8. Point of view

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

To assess thinking, we need to check for 8 factors:

A

To assess thinking:
Check it for:
1. Clarity
2. Accuracy
3. Precision
4. Relevance
5. Depth
6. Breadth
7. Significance
8. Logic and fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What would be the result of assessing and analyzing thinking?

A

YOU BECOME A WELL
CULTIVATED THINKER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

True or False:
A Well-cultivated Critical Thinker:

-Raises vital questions and problems, formulates them clearly and precisely

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

True or False:
A Well-cultivated Critical Thinker:

Gathers and assesses relevant information, using concrete ideas to interpret it effectively

A

False

Gathers and assesses relevant information, using abstract ideas to interpret it effectively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

True or False:
A Well-cultivated Critical Thinker:

Comes to well-reasoned conclusions and solutions, testing them against relevant criteria and
standards

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

True or False:
A Well-cultivated Critical Thinker:

Thinks close-mindedly within alternative systems of thought, recognizing and assessing, as
need be, their assumptions, implications, and practical consequences

A

False

Thinks open-mindedly within alternative systems of thought, recognizing and assessing, as
need be, their assumptions, implications, and practical consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

True or False:
A Well-cultivated Critical Thinker:

Communicates effectively with others in figuring out solutions to complex problems

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Critical thinking adds a _______________to ordinary thinking.

A

Critical thinking adds a
SECOND LEVEL OF THINKING
to ordinary thinking.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

True or False

A Well-cultivated Critical Thinker:

The first level analyzes, assesses, and improves our ordinary thinking

A

False

A Well-cultivated Critical Thinker:

The second level analyzes, assesses, and improves our ordinary thinking.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

It is a spontaneous and non-reflective.
-Contains insight, prejudice, truth, and error, good and bad reasoning, indiscriminately combined

A

First-order thinking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

A first-order thinking raised to the level of conscious realization (analyzed, assessed, and reconstructed)

A

Second-order thinking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Also called the Parts of Thinking or the Fundamental Structures of Thought.

A

Elements of Thought
in Critical Thinking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

These provide a general framework of thought

A

Elements of Thought
in Critical Thinking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

8 Elements of Thought
in Critical Thinking:

A
  1. Purpose
  2. Point of View
  3. Assumptions
  4. Implications and Consequences
  5. Information
  6. Interpretation and Inference
  7. Concepts
  8. Question at Issue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

9 Universal Intellectual Standards in Critical Thinking:

A
  1. Clarity – understandable, the meaning can be grasped
  2. Accuracy – free from errors
  3. Precision – exact to the necessary level of detail
  4. Relevance – relating to the matter at hand
  5. Depth – contains complexities and interrelationships
  6. Breadth – encompasses multiple viewpoints
  7. Logic – no contradictions
  8. Significance – focuses on the most important
  9. Fairness – justifiable; not self serving
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Universal Intellectual Standards in Critical Thinking: understandable, the meaning can be grasped
Clarity
26
True or False Universal Intellectual Standards in Critical Thinking: Precision – free from errors
False Accuracy – free from errors
27
Universal Intellectual Standards in Critical Thinking: exact to the necessary level of detail
Precision
28
Universal Intellectual Standards in Critical Thinking: relating to the matter at hand
Relevance
29
True or False Universal Intellectual Standards in Critical Thinking: Logic – contains complexities and interrelationships
False Depth – contains complexities and interrelationship
30
Universal Intellectual Standards in Critical Thinking: encompasses multiple viewpoints
Breadth
31
Universal Intellectual Standards in Critical Thinking: -no contradictions
Logic
32
Universal Intellectual Standards in Critical Thinking: focuses on the most important
Significance
33
Universal Intellectual Standards in Critical Thinking: justifiable; not self serving
Fairness
34
The reader or listener can understand what is being said
Clarity
35
“Gateway” standard to critical thinking
Clarity
36
If a statement is unclear, we cannot determine whether it is accurate or relevant
Clarity
37
This is essential for both educator and student
Clarity
38
Accuracy Remember that a statement may be clear but inaccurate -> ___________________
Remember that a statement may be clear but inaccurate -> Validate Sources of information always
39
Remember that a statement may be clear but inaccurate -> Validate Sources of information always
Accuracy
40
Exactness and Specificity Giving exact amount of detail that is required for a given situation
Precision
41
-How is this idea connected to the topic at hand - How to presented facts bare to the topic - How do ideas presented by students relate to the ideas discussed
Relevance
42
-How do ideas/ presentations address the complexities of topic at hand - How do deal with significant factors that must be addressed (i.e. lectures)
Depth
43
- The idea of using multiple points of view - Using other ways to look at and solve problems
Breadth
44
- If the topic/ problem makes sense - If answers to question sets follow from given data/information
Logic
45
- What the most significant information is needed to be gathered (for students) or conveyed (for educators) - How important are the facts being presented with regards to the context of discussion
Significance
46
-If the thinking, assumptions and behaviors are justified - If the concepts discussed are being justifiably used or discussed
Fairness
47
Criteria of an “exemplary” student: 1. Often raises important questions and issues 2. Study lessons in a habitual and effective manner. 3. Analyzes key questions and problems clearly and precisely 4. Recognizes key questionable assumptions, clarifies key concepts effectively 5. Read a lot of books. 6. Uses language in keeping with educated usage 7. Frequently identifies relevant competing points of view 8. Has motivation and discipline to perform well in class. 9. Demonstrates a commitment to reasoning carefully from clearly stated premises in the subject, 10. Has a marked sensitivity to important implications and consequences
Criteria of an “exemplary” student: 1. Often raises important questions and issues 2. Analyzes key questions and problems clearly and precisely 3. Recognizes key questionable assumptions, clarifies key concepts effectively 4. Uses language in keeping with educated usage 5. Frequently identifies relevant competing points of view 6. Demonstrates a commitment to reasoning carefully from clearly stated premises in the subject, 7. Has a marked sensitivity to important implications and consequences
48
4 ADDENDUM: STUDENT PROFILES
1. Exemplary Students 2. High-Performing Students 3. Mixed-Quality Students 4. Low-Performing Students
49
4 ADDENDUM: STUDENT PROFILES They frequently try to get through courses by memorizing things rather than by understanding them
Low-performing Students
50
4 ADDENDUM: STUDENT PROFILES Often produce work that is unclear, imprecise, and poorly reasoned.
Low-performing Students
51
4 ADDENDUM: STUDENT PROFILES May achieve competence in reciting information and naming concepts, but they often use terms and concepts incorrectly because their understanding is superficial or mistaken
Low-performing Students
52
4 ADDENDUM: STUDENT PROFILES - Perform inconsistently in a subject, and therefore develop a limited body of knowledge.
Mixed-Quality Students
53
4 ADDENDUM: STUDENT PROFILES - Often use memorization as a substitute for understanding
Mixed Quality Students
54
4 ADDENDUM: STUDENT PROFILES - Learning at this level demonstrates incomplete comprehension of basic concepts and principles
Mixed Quality Students
55
4 ADDENDUM: STUDENT PROFILES - Internalized a few of the intellectual standards appropriate to the assessment of their own work in a subject, but demonstrate inconsistency in self-evaluation
Mixed Quality Students
56
4 ADDENDUM: STUDENT PROFILES - Sound thinking within a subject
High-Performing Students
57
4 ADDENDUM: STUDENT PROFILES - Development of a range of knowledge acquired through the exercise of thinking skills and abilities.
High-Performing Students
58
4 ADDENDUM: STUDENT PROFILES - Thinking is, clear, precise, and well-reasoned, but sometimes LACKS depth of insight (especially into opposing points of view).
High-Performing Students
59
4 ADDENDUM: STUDENT PROFILES - Internalize the intellectual standards relevant to the subject and demonstrate competence in self-evaluation
High-Performing Students
60
4 ADDENDUM: STUDENT PROFILES - Implies excellence in thinking within the subject
Exemplary Students
61
4 ADDENDUM: STUDENT PROFILES - Use their intellectual skills to develop a broad range of knowledge.
Exemplary Students
62
4 ADDENDUM: STUDENT PROFILES -Exemplary work is clear, precise, and well-reasoned, but also insightful and well-informed
Exemplary Students
63
4 ADDENDUM: STUDENT PROFILES - Student has internalized the basic intellectual standards appropriate to assessing his or her own work in a subject and is highly skilled at self-evaluation.
Exemplary Students
64
True or False Close reading and substantive writing are symbiotic skills of disciplined thought they support and reinforce one another.
True
65
True or False Both close reading and substantive writing require that people think from multiple perspectives, and both require that we use the elements of reasoning well
True
66
“Could you elaborate on that point?”
Clarity
67
"Could you express that point another way?"
Clarity
68
"Could you give me illustration / example?"
Clarity
69
"Is that statement true?"
Accuracy
70
"How can we check if it is accurate or true?"
Accuracy
71
"Could you give me more details?"
Precision
72
"Could you be more specific?"
Precision
73
"How is this idea connected to the topic at hand ?"
Relevance
74
How to present facts bare to the topic?
Relevance
75
How do ideas presented by students relate to the ideas discussed ?
Relevance
76
How does the questions relate to the issue we are dealing with?
Relevance
77
How do ideas/ presentations address the complexities of topic at hand
Depth
78
How to deal with significant factors that must be addressed (i.e. lectures)
Depth
79
How are you taking into account the problems of the questions?
Depth
80
How are you dealing with the most significant factors in the problem?
Depth
81
Do we need to consider another point of view? Is there another way to look at this questions? What will this look like from the pov of other?
Breadth
82
If the topic/ problem makes sense ?
Logic
83
If answers to question sets follow from given data/information?
Logic
84
Does this really make sense? How does that inference follow from the evidence?
Logic
85
Does all of this fit together logically?
Logic
86
How important are the facts being presented with regards to the context of discussion? Which of the idea / concept is the most important?
Significance
87
Is my thinking justified given the evidence? Are my assumptions justified?
Fairness
88
Is my behavior fair? Is my selfish interest keeping me from considering problem from alternative viewpoints?
Fairness