Proofs Flashcards
(95 cards)
How would you define an even integer?
An integer n is even, if and only if, n equals twice some integer.
How would you define an odd integer
An integer n is odd, if only if, n equals twice some integer plus 1
Given that a and b are integers
Is 6a2b even?
Given a and b are integers
Is 10a + 8b + 1 odd?
Integers are closed under which operations?
Addition, subtraction, multiplication
Meaning for example, integer+integer=integer. But integer/integer does not necessarily equal and integer
How would you define a prime number?
An integer n is prime if, and only if, n > 1 and for all positive integers r and s, if n = rs, then either r or s equals n
How would you define a composite integer?
An integer n is composite if, and only if, n>1 and for some integers r and s, n=rs such that 1 < r,s < n
Is every integer greater than 1 either prime or composite? If so, why?
Given an integer n. If n is greater than one and n=rs where r and s is
Prove that ∃ an even integer, n, that can be written in two ways as a sum of two prime numbers.
Suppose n = 10. 10=2k where k is an integer (5) meaning 10 is even. 10 can be written as 5+5 or 7+3. 5=5⋅1 and 7=7⋅1 and 3=3⋅1 meaning all these numbers are prime.
Suppose r and s are integers.
Prove that ∃ an integer k such that 22r + 18s = 2k
Let k=11r + 9s. This means that k is an integer because it is the sum of two integers (11r and 9r are integers as it integers are also closed under multiplication)
True or false?
Disproving a statement is the same as proving the negation statement true.
True
What is the difference between constructive proofs of existence and nonconstructive proofs of existence
In constructive, it is more theoretical meaning it basically proves it by insert values into the predicate and showing that it is true. On the other hand, nonconstructive does this by using known rules (more algebraic)
How would you prove a statement false through a counterexample?
Find the negation of that statement and prove that the negation is true. Then the original statement, will be false by default.
How would you prove a statement true through a counterexample?
Find the negation of that statement and prove that the negation is false. Then the original statement, will be true by default.
Disprove the following using a counterexample
∀ a,b ∈ ℝ, if a2=b2 then a=b
First, find the negation: ∃ a,b ∈ ℝ such that a2=b2 and a≠b. And note the nature of squares where the sign of the negative will not matter. Suppose a=2 and b=-2. here a2=b2 but they are not equavalent
What is the “method of generalizing from a generic particular”?
It is used for universal quanitifers. In contrast to the method of exhaustion, it supposes that x is a particular but arbituary chosen element of a set and show that x satisfies the statement.
x must be particular (meaning a single number) and x must be arbituary (meaning that any value substituted into x will give the same output).
What is it called when the “method of generalizing from a generic particular” is applied to the form “If P(x) then Q(x)”
Method of direct proof
What are the steps for the method of direct proof?
- Make sure it is in the form ∀ x ∈ D, if P(x) then Q(x)
- Start the proof by supposing x is a particular but arbitrarily chosen value of D. For which P(x) is true. It can be written as “Suppose x∈D and P(x)”
- Finally prove that Q(x) is true by using previously established rules and definitions
Prove that the sum of any two even integers is even.
Formally written: ∀ a, b ∈ ℤ, if a and b are even, then ab is even.
1. Suppose ∀ a,b ∈ ℤ and a and b are even
2. a = 2c where ∀ j ∈ ℤ
3. b = 2d where ∀ d ∈ ℤ
4. a+b=2c+2d=2(c+d) Using laws of the distrubutive properties of algebra
5. Since integers are closed under addition, c+d is can be written as some integer k. a+b=2k
6. Therefore a+b=2k (a+b is even) as it follows the form n=2k meaning the statement is true
7. Make sure to end with a QED (□)
For the statement: “Every complete bipartite graph is connected”
Write the first sentence of the proof (the “starting point”) and the last sentence of the proof (the “conclusion to be shown”)
It is helpful to write it in its formal form:
For all graphs G, if G is a complete bipartite, then G is connected.
**Starting point: ** Suppose that G is a particular but arbitirary graph and G is a complete bipartite
Conclusion to be shown G is connected □
Fill in the blanks for the following theorum
Theorum: For all integers r and s, if r is even and s is odd, then 3r+2s is even.
a) The definition of even and odd
b) Substitution (Algebra)
c) Integers are closed under products and sums
d) The definition of even
True or false?
At the start of a proof, you must always write “proof”
True
True or false?
Proofs don’t need to be self contained (meaning you don’t have to define every variable)
False. All variables should be defined with their domains and such.
What is a indirect proof?
Also known as a reductio ad absurdum or proof by contradiction
Supposing that the statement is to be proved false. Then you work through the proof until you find a contradiction. The contradiction shows that the statement is not false, therefore true.
For example. imagine a man is accuesed of robbing a bank and he says that he did not rob it. Suppose the man did commit the crime. Then, at the time of the crime he must of been at the bank. However, at the time of the crime, he was in a meeting with 20 people far from the bank and all 20 people testified that he was indeed in the meeting. This contradicts the supposition that he committed the crime, therefore he did not commit the crime.