Property Final Flashcards
(62 cards)
True Owner v Adverse Possessor
Remedy: Ejectment
Defense: Adv. Possession
Adverse Possessor v True Owner
Quiet title action
Elements for Ejectment
Defendant is in wrongful possession and;
Plaintiff has a legal right to possession
(All causes of action are subject to statute of limitations)
What is Adverse Possession
Elements/Prima Facie case for ejectment, Plaintiff must show that
Defendant is in wrongful possession and;
plaintiff has a legal right to possession
Statute of limitations
After period of time, the True Owner cant bring Ejectment
True Owner loses the right to bring c/a for Ejectment
Property rule of first in time, first in right
The “first” possessor has greater rights than any subsequent possessor, other than the true owner
What are the rights/liabilities of True Owner and Adverse Possessor(s)
True Owner may bring ejectment against wrongful possessor within statute of limitations [TO v AP]
True Owner loses right to bring c/a ejectment after statutory period
No other person (other than True Owner) may bring ejectment against AP
Wrongful Possessor (AP1) may bring ejectment against anyone who later intrudes or possesses property (AP2). (First in time, first in right). AP1 beats AP2 and ROW
TO can no longer bring the cause of action
If and when the TO can no longer bring the cause of action for ejectment against Adverse Possessor, then under doctrine of Adv-poss,
Adverse Possessor becomes the “true owner”
At this point, Ap’s rights cannot be defeated
Elements of Adverse possession
(Duration - Statue of Limitations)
Continuous
Uninterrupted
Length of Time
Tacking & Disabilities
Elements of Adverse possession
(Possession Ejectment)
Actual Possession of Land (an “entry”)
Exclusive
Open & Notorious
Hostile & Adverse (claim of right)
Elements of Adverse possession (Possession Ejectment) Actual Possession of Land (an “entry”) Without Color of title
Adverse possession by a person claiming title not found upon a written instrument
Land is deemed to have been possessed and occupied in either of the following cases, and no others
Substantial enclosures
Cultivation
Improvements
Elements of Adverse possession (Possession Ejectment) Actual Possession of Land (an “entry”) With Color of title
If adverse Possessor had color of title, then Adverse Possessor acquires
Land actually possessed; and
Land constructively possessed
If color of title, land is “deemed” to have been possessed even though AP actually “possessed” only a smaller portion of the property
Land is deemed to have been possessed and occupied in either of the following cases:
Improvements
Cultivation
Substantial Enclosures
Elements of Adverse possession (Possession
Ejectment) Open & Notorious
Minor encroachment, TO has actual notice (not exceeding several feet)
Actual knowledge (Encroachment is minor)
If encroachment does not exceed several feet
Material encroachment, TO has presumption of notice (exceeding several feet) Imputed knowledge (encroachment is material)
If exceeding several feet
Open and Notorious issue
Does TO have notice?
Hostile and Adverse Issue
The nature of intent
Elements of Adverse possession (Possession
Ejectment) Exclusive
Not an easement: non-exclusive right to use
- Identify type of right
- Possession v License v Right
`
Elements of Adverse possession (Possession
Ejectment) Hostile & Adverse (claim of right)
Hostile & Adverse (claim of right)
- Intent Doesn’t Matter - Objective (CT rule)
- Intent of AP - Good faith/Mistaken Belief (NY Rule)
- Intent of AP - Bad Faith/Active Trespasser (Maine Rule)
Elements of Adverse possession - Duration
(Statute of Limitations)
Continuous
Ordinarily marks the conduct of owners in general in holding, managing and caring of property of like nature and condition
Elements of Adverse possession - Duration
(Statute of Limitations)
Uninterrupted
Elements of Adverse possession - Duration
(Statute of Limitations)
Length of Time
- Determined by statue of limitations
Unlawful entry
Any unlawful entry is “hostile” since it is without right
Unlawful entry Majority view
Even the good faith mistaken possessor can claim “adverse” possession (requisite hostility). This is now the majority view.
State of mind & Intent of AP does matter (examine the subjective intent of AP) The Bad Guy
Maine Doctrine (Prior NJ rule)
Examine the subjective intent of AP
Requires a knowing wrongful taking.
Active/Aggressive
Trespasser
Punishes the adverse possessor who is mistaken in good faith
State of mind & Intent of AP does matter (examine the subjective intent of AP) The Good Guy
AP must have good faith belief thats/he owns the land (even if mistaken)
NY is an example (NY RPaPL 501(iii))
Open and Notorious
Material - Presumed or imputed Notice
If possession of land is clear & unequivocal as to be immediately visible
To permit a presumption of notice to arise in the case of a minor border encroachment not exceeding several feet would fly in the face of reality and require TO to be on constant alert for possible small encroachments
Open & Notorious
Minor - TO must have actual notice
If “small area” and the fact of the intrusion is not clearly and self-evidently apparent to the naked eye but requires an on-site survey
Applies where the precise location of the dividing line is ordinarily unknown to either TO or AP and there is nothing on the land to show by visual observation the extent of the encroachment