Property Final Flashcards

(62 cards)

1
Q

True Owner v Adverse Possessor

A

Remedy: Ejectment
Defense: Adv. Possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Adverse Possessor v True Owner

A

Quiet title action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Elements for Ejectment

A

Defendant is in wrongful possession and;

Plaintiff has a legal right to possession
(All causes of action are subject to statute of limitations)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Adverse Possession

A

Elements/Prima Facie case for ejectment, Plaintiff must show that
Defendant is in wrongful possession and;
plaintiff has a legal right to possession

Statute of limitations
After period of time, the True Owner cant bring Ejectment
True Owner loses the right to bring c/a for Ejectment

Property rule of first in time, first in right
The “first” possessor has greater rights than any subsequent possessor, other than the true owner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the rights/liabilities of True Owner and Adverse Possessor(s)

A

True Owner may bring ejectment against wrongful possessor within statute of limitations [TO v AP]

True Owner loses right to bring c/a ejectment after statutory period

No other person (other than True Owner) may bring ejectment against AP

Wrongful Possessor (AP1) may bring ejectment against anyone who later intrudes or possesses property (AP2). (First in time, first in right). AP1 beats AP2 and ROW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

TO can no longer bring the cause of action

A

If and when the TO can no longer bring the cause of action for ejectment against Adverse Possessor, then under doctrine of Adv-poss,

Adverse Possessor becomes the “true owner”

At this point, Ap’s rights cannot be defeated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Elements of Adverse possession
(Duration - Statue of Limitations)

A

Continuous

Uninterrupted

Length of Time

Tacking & Disabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Elements of Adverse possession
(Possession Ejectment)

A

Actual Possession of Land (an “entry”)

Exclusive

Open & Notorious

Hostile & Adverse (claim of right)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Elements of Adverse possession (Possession Ejectment) Actual Possession of Land (an “entry”) Without Color of title

A

Adverse possession by a person claiming title not found upon a written instrument
Land is deemed to have been possessed and occupied in either of the following cases, and no others
Substantial enclosures
Cultivation
Improvements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Elements of Adverse possession (Possession Ejectment) Actual Possession of Land (an “entry”) With Color of title

A

If adverse Possessor had color of title, then Adverse Possessor acquires
Land actually possessed; and
Land constructively possessed

If color of title, land is “deemed” to have been possessed even though AP actually “possessed” only a smaller portion of the property

Land is deemed to have been possessed and occupied in either of the following cases:
Improvements
Cultivation
Substantial Enclosures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Elements of Adverse possession (Possession
Ejectment) Open & Notorious

A

Minor encroachment, TO has actual notice (not exceeding several feet)
Actual knowledge (Encroachment is minor)
If encroachment does not exceed several feet

Material encroachment, TO has presumption of notice (exceeding several feet) Imputed knowledge (encroachment is material)
If exceeding several feet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Open and Notorious issue

A

Does TO have notice?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hostile and Adverse Issue

A

The nature of intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Elements of Adverse possession (Possession
Ejectment) Exclusive

A

Not an easement: non-exclusive right to use
- Identify type of right
- Possession v License v Right
`

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Elements of Adverse possession (Possession
Ejectment) Hostile & Adverse (claim of right)

A

Hostile & Adverse (claim of right)
- Intent Doesn’t Matter - Objective (CT rule)

  • Intent of AP - Good faith/Mistaken Belief (NY Rule)
  • Intent of AP - Bad Faith/Active Trespasser (Maine Rule)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Elements of Adverse possession - Duration
(Statute of Limitations)
Continuous

A

Ordinarily marks the conduct of owners in general in holding, managing and caring of property of like nature and condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Elements of Adverse possession - Duration
(Statute of Limitations)
Uninterrupted

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Elements of Adverse possession - Duration
(Statute of Limitations)
Length of Time

A
  • Determined by statue of limitations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Unlawful entry

A

Any unlawful entry is “hostile” since it is without right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Unlawful entry Majority view

A

Even the good faith mistaken possessor can claim “adverse” possession (requisite hostility). This is now the majority view.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

State of mind & Intent of AP does matter (examine the subjective intent of AP) The Bad Guy

A

Maine Doctrine (Prior NJ rule)

Examine the subjective intent of AP

Requires a knowing wrongful taking.
Active/Aggressive

Trespasser

Punishes the adverse possessor who is mistaken in good faith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

State of mind & Intent of AP does matter (examine the subjective intent of AP) The Good Guy

A

AP must have good faith belief thats/he owns the land (even if mistaken)

NY is an example (NY RPaPL 501(iii))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Open and Notorious
Material - Presumed or imputed Notice

A

If possession of land is clear & unequivocal as to be immediately visible

To permit a presumption of notice to arise in the case of a minor border encroachment not exceeding several feet would fly in the face of reality and require TO to be on constant alert for possible small encroachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Open & Notorious

Minor - TO must have actual notice

A

If “small area” and the fact of the intrusion is not clearly and self-evidently apparent to the naked eye but requires an on-site survey

Applies where the precise location of the dividing line is ordinarily unknown to either TO or AP and there is nothing on the land to show by visual observation the extent of the encroachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Walling v Przybylo
Knowledge that another person is the title owner does not, in and of itself, defeat a claim of right by an adverse possession OK if AP is an “active” trespasser Conduct prevails over knowledge
26
NY RPAPL 501 (2008)
Statute defines “claim of right” as a reasonable basis to believe that property belongs to AP (i.e., a “good guy”) AP gains title upon expiration of S/L for ejectment so long as… Adverse, claim of right, open & notorious continuous, exclusive, & actual
27
Continuous Only a certain period of time
Continuity of possession may be established although the land is used regularly for only a certain period each year
28
Continuous - Tacking
The requirement of “Privity” is no more than judicial recognition of the need for some reasonable connection between successive occupants of real property so as to raise their claim of right above the status of the wrongdoer of the trespasser The deed running between the parties purporting to transfer the land possessed traditionally furnishes the privity of estate which connects the possession of the successive occupants
29
2 Tacking situations
Tacking successive possession by AP Tacking where AP asserts against series of TO’s
30
Once there is an entry against Owner
AP begins - it will not be defeated or interrupted by subsequent transfers by Owner, whether by deed/sale, or by will or by intestacy
31
Everything relates back to the state of TO’s title
at the time AP entered on the property (“magic glasses”)
32
If Adverse Possessor enters when title is Life estate
Then after the statue of limitation is over, they have The life estate of the current owner and once they die and title changes to the reminder (FSA) then the statue of limitation resets
33
If Adverse Possessor enters when title is FSA
Then after the statute of limitation ends, they will have a FSA, even if in the middle the title changes, only matters of the state of title when the enter
34
Adverse position Disability
If adverse possessor enters during the time the TO has a disability, and the stays for the 10 year statute, TO can bring action 5 years after the disability is cleared
35
Adverse Possession disability ends before 10 years
If adverse possessor enters during the time the TO has a disability, and the disability clears before the 10 year then they dont get the five additional years
36
Adverse Possession disability occurs after entering or if they enter with one disability, TO gains another disability
Doesn't matter if TO is disabled after entering or gains another disability, Only look at the time of entering and the disability at that moment. Once that disability at entering is cleared effects the statute. Not one gained later on or an additional one that wasn't in effect at entering
37
Disability Statute
An action to recover the title or possession of real property shall be brought within 10 years after the cause thereof accrued But if a person entitled to bring such action At the time the cause thereof accrues, is within the age of minority, of unsound mind, or imprisoned such person, after the expiration of 10 years from the time the cause of action occurs, may bring such action within 5 years after such disability is removed
38
Acquisitions of property
Lease/leasehold (including assignments/subleases) Purchase and sale Adverse possession Gifts
39
Gifts
Donor makes a gift to a Donee during donor's life
40
Inter vivos transfer
Transfer during X’s lifetime (e.g., sell or give)
41
Decedent
Person who dies is the decedent
42
Testamentary Disposition
Disposition of property at death
43
Testamentary substitute
Substantially similar so law will try to treat similarly
44
Testator
A person's last will and testament (executor probates the will)
45
Legatee
Named beneficiaries in a will (e.g., ….. to my spouse, A)
46
Interstate
Dies without a will An administration proceeding by administrator
47
Laws of intestacy
Statute that disposes of decedent's property if they die without a will (heirs at law)
48
Distributee
Person who received property under intestacy
49
Heir
A person who inherits property under intestacy laws
50
Valid gift requires
Intention (a question of fact) Delivery (a question of law) No consideration (voluntarily) Acceptance (presumed) Irrevocable (no strings attached)
51
Types of delivery
Actual Actual delivery of item Constructive A key which gives donee the means Symbolic A written instrument (although note that a key can also be symbolic if the state recognizes it)
52
Inter Vivos gift
During lifetime present transfer irrevocable
53
Gift causa mortis
Gift made on deathbed (in contemplation of death revocable at any time prior to death automatically revoked if donor does not die) At CL strictly construed since it is a testamentary disposition in conflict with Statute of Wills Technically, a present transfer subject to a condition subsequent (condition: if donor doesnt die, gift revers to donor)
54
Constructive delivery Common Law
Permitted only if There is plain intent to make gift (back-door way of bringing intent back in), If gift intended to be given is not present, or If gift is present, but it is incapable of manual delivery (size/weight) Other Way to state this: If item is present and capable of being given, then it must actually be given (no constructive delivery permitted) In short if it can be given, it must be
55
Fee Simple Absolute (FSA)
Largest of the estates No inherent ending - infinite At common law, needed to use “and his heirs” Other example of magic words In fee simple absolute (express words show intent) Forever (express words show intent) O to A (no express words; but presumption is FSA)
56
Life Estate
A grant “to A for life” means that A has a Life Estate (a present possessory interest) All life estate’s have an inherent ending - “the life of A” (i.e., when A dies). Therefore, the duration of a life estate is measured by A’s life (compare to 20-year lease) There is always a future interest (reversion or remainder) After A dies, A cannot direct who acquires property (property rights end) Holder of a life estate is referred to as a “life tenant”
57
Life estate transfer
If A has a life estate, A can transfer life estate to X X now has a life estate Pur Autre Vie Even if X holds the life estate, the duration of the life estate is still measured by A’s life. The measuring life doesn't change when A transfers life estate to X
58
" Forever" Common Law for FSA
Doesnt satisfy common law rules would have required "and his hers" The phrase “and his heirs” was required to create FSA
59
"Forever" Modern Rule
Is adequate for the transfer of a FSA Modern Law presumption of FSA (even if magic words not used) The requirement to use “and his heirs” has been abolished in the U.S. Today, a simple conveyance “to A” is sufficient to transfer a fee simple absolute; assuming the grantor owns such an estate
60
Presumption of fee simple
The law now presumes that a deed intends to transfer the largest interest that the grantor owns, which is typically a fee simple absolute
61
Common Practice
While omitting “and his heirs” does not typically affect the validity of scope of a modern deed, its still common practice for many lawyers and deed drafters to include traditional language to avoid any potential confusion or litigation. However, from a legal standpoint, the omission of this phrase should not alter the conveyance of a fee simple absolute in most jurisdiction
62
Restraints on Alienation
Disabling Withhold power to transfer (transfer is void) Forfeiture If you try to transfer interest, forfeit land Promissory Promise not to transfer (similar to LL/T)