Property Midterm Flashcards
Landlord Conveys Present Possessory Interest
Tenant has the right to possess, use, exclude and enjoy the property
Landlord retains a future possessory interest at the termination of the leasehold
if landlord retains future interest = “reversion”
If landlord transfers future interest to a 3rd party = “remainder”
Term of years
Common law
Rule: Term must be a fixed period
The was no limit on the number of years permitted
Term of years
Some American Statutes
Statues limit the duration of terms of years
- Don’t have know when the lease begins
Term with beginning and end (even if exact date is known at time of lease singing)
Term of years
Right to terminate?
Common Law
Because it states when it will terminate, no notice of termination is necessary to bring the estate to an end.
Lease terminates on its own terms with the passage of time
-Can be terminable earlier upon the happening of some event or condition.
Lease could provide Tenant or Landlord with the right to terminate during the least term upon _ days
Notice: There are often other conditions
Periodic Tenancy
Common Law
Leasehold for a period of time that continues for succeeding periods until landlord or tenant gives notice of terminationwith required period of time
Notice: equal to the period, but in now vent greater than six months; if proper termiantion notice is not given, the period is automatically extended
Tenancy at Will
Leasehold without a fixed duration; almost never written and lasts only as long so long as both landlord and tenant wish for it to continue
Notice: Under common law, no advance notice was required
Automatically terminates if (1) tenant dies; (2) landlord sells the property; or (3) tenant assigns the lease to a 3rd party
Holdover Tenancy (Tenancy by Sufferance):
Phrase used to describe a party who was in lawful possession under a lease, but remains after lease terminates; possession becomes unlawful
Not really a tenancy or lease at all; holdover tenant has no real property interest
NY RPL 232-c: If LL accepts rent from holdover tenant, month-to-month tenancy is implied
Legal Possession
Landlord has a duty to deliver the legal right of possession to the tenant. If the landlord leases the same property for the same term to two different tenants, the tenant who signed the first lease will have a superior right of possession as compared to the tenant who signed the second lease (first in time is first in right)
Actual Possession
Hannan v. Dusch
Absent an express covenant, does a landlord have a legal duty to deliver [actual] possession to a new tenant, where a former tenant wrongfully holds over and illegally refuses to surrender possession to the new tenant?)
NOTE: The relevant date in Hannan is the commencement date of the lease (the date specified in the lease on which the new tenant is to take actual possession)
US/American Rule: (Delivery of possession) Common Law
Duty to deliver legal possession only; no implied duty to deliver actual possession
UK/English Rule (delivery of Possession) Common law
Implied duty to deliver both legal and actual possession
The English rule is that in the absence of stipulations to the contrary, there is in every lease an implied covenant on the part of the landlord that the premises shall be open to entry by the tenant at the time fixed by the lease for the beginning of his term
Both the UK/English Rule and US/American Rule imply
a covenant to deliver legal right of possession at the beginning of the term (“there shall be no legal obstacle to the tenants right of possession”)
NY RPL 223-a:
: In the absence of an express provision to the contrary, there shall be implied in every lease of real property a condition that the lessor will deliver possession at the beginning of the term. In the event of breach of such implied conditions the lessee shall have the right to rescind the lease and recover the consideration paid. Such right shall not be deemed inconsistent with any right of action he may have to recover damages.
Similar to the UK/English Rule but note the provision of specific remedies (right to rescind and recover consideration paid)!
Privity of Contract:
legal relationship between the parties to a contract
Privity of Estate:
The legal relationship between the holder of the right of possession (tenant) and the holder of the reversionary interest (the landlord)
Real covenants are binding on parties if
there is privity of estate (even if there’s no privity of contract)
Note: If landlord sues tenant the cause of action is still breach of contract (NOT breach of privity of estate)
Assignment definition
a conveyance (transfer) of a leasehold interest
Elements of Assignment
Tenant cannot assign more than what they have by virtue of the lease
Assignment is a conveyance (original tenant conveys/transfers the right of possession), not a contract
Assignments convey all the original tenant’s rights (not less than all; compare to subleases)
Assignment only has to be signed by assignor (A hereby sells, assigns, conveys, transfers, sets over and delivers) unless the assignee assumes and agrees to perform all the terms, covenants and conditions of the clause required to be performed by the tenant under the lease
Assignments and assumptions shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and assignees
Sublease definition
a conveyance (transfer) of a portion (less than all) of a leasehold interest
Elements of Sublease
Assumption creates privity of contract; release severs privity of contract
No implied releases; no implied assumptions
Only the landlord can release a tenant from their obligations under the lease
Ernst v. Condit Traditional/Formal Rule
Was the instrument a transfer of ALL tenant’s interest?
If T1 transferred all his interest (no reversion) it is an assignment
If T1 transferred less than all his interest, it is a sublease
Ernst v. Condit
Modern Rule
Was the intention of the parties sublease or assign?
“Ascertain the intent of the parties” using the cannons of construction/contract principles
Use of the word “sublet” is not dispositive of the issue
Note: Subleases do not create privity of estate between a LL and T2 and afford the LL no right to sue T2 for breach
Rowe v. A&P
Property View
Courts generally disfavor restraints on alienation as contrary to the best interest of society to utilize land freely