PSY225 premidterm Flashcards

1
Q

Social Facilitation

A

When people perform better in the prsence of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who was the fist to integrata nature v. nurture debate

A

Kurt Lewin: A foundational social psychologist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was Kurt Lewin’s theory of behavior?

A

B = f(P,E) – Behavior is the funciton of biological drives and environmental influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a life space

A

The combo of all factors that influence a person
(Consists of objective and subjective environment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When was the golden age of psychology

A

WW11 to 1969

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Clarke study in his doll experiment?

A

Internalized racism with both black and white kids predering the white doll

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does TMS do?

A

An eletrical current flows through wire placed on scalp. Causes temporary and reverable brain damage to study it effcts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the experimenter bias

A

When the experimenter unknowinly influences results by previous knowledge or baises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How do we avoid experimenter bias?

A

Researcher must be unaware of who is the control group
- Use tech or an unbiased robot for info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did the Bargh et al. study prove?

A

That experimenter bias can have a huge impact on results, scewing them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the key things to keep in mind for challenges a social psych researcher might face?

A

Loss of control, experimenter bias, loss of control, realism, and use of deception, and ethic problems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are te two types of causal atributions that exist?

A

Dispositional and Situational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Dispositional Attribution

A

Person’s predisposition and personality
Internal → “She must have failed this math test because she is really bad at logical thinking”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Situational Attribution definition:

A

The person’s context, culture, environment
External → “She must have failed the test because it was a hot classroom and it was a distracting environment”
We look at our own lives and say that our actions are from the situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is attributional theory

A

The theory that describes the way in which people explain the causes of their own and other people’s behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the fundamental attribution error?

A

the tendency to overestimate the general importance of personality or dispositional factors more than situational or environmental influences when describing or explaining the cause of social behavior
E.g. You see Sheila slacking in classes. You are more likely to assume that she’s just lazy than that her mom is sick.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

“So much about what we do based on the situation. The situation really strongly influences our behaviour.

A

Zimbardo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the self serving bias?

A

the tendency to see other people in dispositional ways but to see the self in a situational way.
Feeds into our need for control.
“I failed the test because it was loud in the classroom, but Bob failed because he’s stupid.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the self fulfilling prophecy?

A

When we act in ways that reflect the assumptions we make, we create a self-fulfilling prophecy
When we act in ways that reflect how we see others, he creates a self-fulfilling prophecy.
If you fail a test and assume it’s because of your environment, you won’t let it affect your self-concept; you will likely succeed in life.
If you label someone as an idiot and treat them as an idiot, they are more likely not to succeed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What did Dione’s Face experiment study?

A

The Halo effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is a Quasi-experimental design?

A

A study where participants can not be randomly assigned.
Eg. Extroverts vs Introverts:
You need to specifically find groups of people and assign them as they already are.
There is a limit to the causal power of your study
There may be extraneous variables again. `

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is functional Localization

A

Brain function is local
Supported by the case study method
Draws of the pseudoscience of phrenology
Finding people with brain damage and seeing that they only had localized brain damage and effects
E.g. Phineas Gage : Got localized brain injury to the frontal lobe - had huge personality change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is Equipotentiality

A

The belief that all things in the brain are equally responsible for performing a task.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What did Lashley’s rats show?

A

Lashley removed bits of cortical tissue from rats. The amount of tissur removed mattered, but not from where it was. Because of this, Lashley theorized that this meant that the whole brain is able to do all things.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
What was the problem with Lashley's theory about Equipoteneiality
His experiment was faulty. He was only taking surface-level brain matter and nothing from the hippocampus in any of the rats
26
We knoe that neither of Equipotentiality and Funcional Localization are true.
We have both different parts of the brains specialized in things; we also have to have parts of our brains. e.g. When we are looking at faces, our face perception faculties are localized and also the entire brain is active
27
NASA administrators overlooking safety checks and Hitler's inner circle are examples of what:
Groupthink and Conformity
28
What is the Chameleon effect
When people mirror nonverbal behaviors/mannerisms unconciously
29
What did the CHartrand and Bargh study show?
Students ranked confederates who mirrored mannerisms as more likeable but didn’t know why
30
What factors impact confomrity?
Models, Self esteem, Unanimity, age, commitment, and accountability. Nature of the group also plays a general role
31
What are reference groups
The groups we belong to and look to in how we should act.
32
What did the Schachter and Singer experiment do
Gave people adrenaline and only told have of the people that it was adrenaline
33
What did Schachter and Singer show as a result of their adrenaline study>
Those who were aware of their physiological symptoms did not conform. Those confused about their adrenaline-filled body were stressed in the ambiguous situation so would mimic a confederate who was in the room with them.
34
Explain what happened in 1938 with Orson Welle's 'War of Worlds'
People missed the previous radio broadcast of it being a book Widespread panic (Some people started freaking out at the trick or treaters - it was Halloween - and more and more people started freaking out.)
35
What is Media Contagion
The media causing panic from the rapid spread of emoaion and behavior through a croud, which is social contagion, made worse with the media.
36
How did the Tylenol poinonings demonstrate the power of social and medai contagion?
E.g. The well publicized Tylenol poisonings made people go crazy with paranoia, attributing vague symptoms to the tylenol they had taken. They were fine. But the more panic led to more panic.
37
Explain the dancing manias of the 1300s-1500s
German village: Someone started randomly dancing. Soon other people did. Eventually over 1000 people were dancing, hallucinating, writhing, screaming, and no one know why. No one knew why: Mental illness? Demonic Possession? Poisoned food? People were dying from heart attacks of overexertion - This is all from social contagion
38
What are the 3 levels of condformity
Compliance, Identification, Internalization
39
What is compliance all about?
Power
40
What is Identification all about?
Attractiveness
41
What is Internalization all about
Credibility
42
What are factors that counter conformity
1. If people holding a minority view exprese their position confidently and constantly 2. If the minority used to agree with the majority but changed their mind 3. If group menmners are in majoirty are motivated to make an accurate decision more than a quick one. 4. If the person is not oblivious to the power of the social context they are in
43
What did Ciandini's experiment do?
Placed flyers under people's windshield wipers
44
What did Cialdindi's flyer experiment prove:
S1: Car owners were not likely to throw the flyer on the parking lot ground when they saw someone pick up another type of garbage S2: Car owner saw flyer and immediately threw on ground + drove away
45
What did Keizer's Cash Envelope Experiment show
In the nice neighborhood, People would put money in mailbox and put up flag In the boarded window neighborhood, People would keep the $ =Broken Windows theory
46
Social Pressure can be...
Hidden/Open, Formal/Informal, and Direct/Indirect
47
We are more likely to help if no one else is around - when there is no diffusion of responsibility
True
48
If we are in a rush, we are less likely to help. Give the example associated with this.
(minister study - seminary students asked to give a practice sermon: a speech on the good samaritan and were told that if they hurried, they would be just in time to deliver it; on the way, a confederate staged a medical emergency and only 10% of the seminary students stopped to help)
49
We are more likel to help someone if the person is a part of our social group.
We are likely to help a fellow camper if we hear a threat = campers in the same place = social group. Less likely if we are in a busy city where there are a lot of people.
50
What did Piliavin's Train Study do?
Confederate staged a medical emergency in a train setting S1: Confederate passed out in the station S2: Confederate passed out on the moving train
51
What did Pilioavin's Train Study show?
When we are a part of a group, we are more likely to help. When the confederate passed out in the station, he was not usually helped. When he passed out on the train, even if he reeked of alcohol, he was nearly always helped.
52
What did the Headgames study show with Line cutting?
People got angry Some people cut in front of the cheaters, then the rest of the people cheated in front of them too Rightenous indignation because they were breaking the rules
53
What did Nathan DeWall Line Experiment show?
Put random tape lines on the floor of museum Had an official looking person by a sign saying: “please stay on the tape line” Everyone did it; even when the tape lines made them go in circles and zigzags without seeing the exhibits
54
What partof the brain yells "time to conform!"
The cingluate Gyrus
55
When we follow rules, we get signals to our ventral vibration of the brain
→ This is in the Limbic System – Amygdala
56
What are Susan Fiske's central social motives?
Belonging Trust Understanding and Predicting others Control The Need to Matter
57
What 3 motives are exploited in terrorist recruitment?
The need to belong, the need to matter, and Control
58
What are the two subsets of attributions?
Dispositional; and Situational
59
What is the fundemenal attribution errror ?
the tendency to overestimate the general importance of personality or dispositional factors more than situational or environmental influences when describing or explaining the cause of social behavior E.g. You see Sheila slacking in classes. You are more likely to assume that she’s just lazy than her mom is sick.
60
What are the 3 types of heuristics?
Representative Availability Affect
61
What is the Representative Heuristic
When we focus on surface-level facts (Lucky charms look more unhealthy than Harvest Crunch granola but the simplicity and gran of the packaging makes us think its healthier)
62
What is the Availability Heuristic?
the tendency to predict the likelihood of an event, or judge how risky it is, based on how easy it is to bring specific examples to mind. E.g. You are more likely to be shot to death by a toddler accidentaly than be killed by a terrorist attack but the reporting of terrorism and examples that come to mind because of it makes us fear it’s going to happen. If we can remember and process information fluently or easily, it seems “truer” to us than if we have to struggle to assess its veracity. People who read arguments printed in a clear, easy-to-read font were more likely to believe what they read than those who read the same words printed in a blurry, hard-to-read font. Statements that rhyme or “roll off the tongue” are judged to be truer than statements that say the same thing “Any lie told enough will become truth” – Nazi Propagandist
63
What is the Affect Heuristic
Our feelings influence our judgement. (People who like Ronald Raegan believed that he got straight A's in uni. People who don't like him believed that he never got above a C)
64
If we have no initial impression of a person, we will treat them as if we are in their shoes.
true
65
Why do we mispredict our future?
When we look at the future, we don’t think about other factors We can overestimate our ability to do stuff We make decisions based on how much we will enjoy something more than if we can actually do that thing.
66
What is cognitive dissonance?
the state of tension that occurs whenever a person simultaneously holds 2 cognitions (attitudes, ideas, opinions, belief) that are incompatible + Inconsistent This is uncomfortable so we try to fix this with new mindsets and altering our actions Can take the form of rationalizing current actions, adopting new mindsets, or adopting an extreme ideology
67
What are 3 ways we reduce cognitive dissonace?
Modify Beliefs, Add in new cognitions, or downplay its importance
68
Cognitive Dissonance results from clashing 2 fundamental motives:
The desire to be right -- and -- the desire to believe we are right (This is why we conform a lot)
69
How does Justification-of-our-actions work?
Any negative info about a decision you made are dissonant with the fact that you chose it. So if you make a decision you see from sources is a bad choice, people make a point of looking for evidence that supports their decision, convince themselves that they are happy with their choice, and criticise alternatives
70
Explain the Principle of Irrevocability
When a decision is irreversible, you are more likely to support it wholeheartedly When researchers interviewed different betters at horse races, the people who were at the window about to place a bet were reasonable and looked at all the facts. Once they interviewed people who had just betted, they were sure of their facts, convinced that their bet was the most logical.
71
Explain Lowballing (This is part of the principle of Irrevocability)
Lowballing is where a low price is initially offered - but often raised Cialdini’s Study In buying a car, the customer received an unprecedented low deal on the car they want The buyer starts the paperwork The dealer leaves and says that they made a mistake in the prices and his manager won’t let him sell for so low - returns the price to the expected price The customer has the option to back out! BUT the customer usually goes through with it WHY? Implicit Commitment: Writing down the down payment, even though it’s not binding, gives the impression of a big commitment Anticipation of reward: Customer is excited for the car and cancelling these actions causes dissonance - “I want the car. If I cancel, this work will be for nothing and I will not have the car” Marginal Price Difference: The increased price seems only slightly higher than alternatives and the person was already prepared to meet the initial price
72
What is entrapment?
People making a small decision, justify it, then over a period of time are increasingly committed until over their head Foot-in-the-door technique The process of using small favors to encourage people to accede to larger requests: The formalized and manipulated use of entrapment Jim Jones starting cult : Starts with donations to promote peace. People rationalize their decision, saying that they donated because the cause is good. The deeds start as small; gradually increase and people get in over their heads.
73
What did the Arthur R Cohen study do?
Students who initially disapproved of police action in the New Haven Student Riots to write strong and forceful essays defending the police’s actions. Group A: Paid 50 c Group B: Paid 10 $
74
What dd the Arthur R Cohen study's results show?
Students who were paid the least experienced the highest dissonance, as they had minimal external justification for their counterattitudinal behavior. They shifted their internal attitudes, expressing increased support for the police. Conversely, those who received higher payments ($10) had sufficient external justification and maintained their initial negative views of the police.
75
What did the Fesinger and Carlsmith study do?
College kids asked to perform a boring task (turning screws for an hour) After they were told to lie to a waiting participant, saying the task was interesting . 2 groups: Group A: People were offered 1$ to lie Group B: People were offered 20$ to lie
76
What did the Fesinger and Carlsmith study show?
Group A lacked sufficient external justification to rationalize their lie. So they had dissonance. (“This task was dumb ; why would I lie? 1$ is hardly anything.”) To resolve this, they later rated the task as cathartic and relaxing, so they didn’t feel like they were lying. Group B: Experienced low dissonance because the 20 bucks was enough to rationalize their decision. (“This task was dumb. 20$ is nice to have. That is enough to justify lying” They lied and later talked about how the task was truthfully boring.
77
What did Philip Zimbardo's electric shock experiment do?
Explored how dissonance influences physical experiences, such as pain perception Group A: Participants voluntariey committed to receiving shocks Group B: No choice in receiving shocks
78
What did Zimbardo's shock experiment show?
Participants in Group A: Didn’t have external justification because they were there voluntarily; to reduce the dissonance of being in pain and volunteering for it ; the reported less pain and showed lower pain response. Group B: Reported higher levels of pain and were physiologically with more response to the pain
79
What did Carlsmith's Desirable toy study do and show?
Each kid was forbidden from playing with their most appealing toy Group A: Received a mild threat (“I would angry with you”) Group B: Received a severe threat (“I would be so mad that I take all your toys away.”) Children are left alone with the forbidden toys and other ones Then kids rated the enjoyableness of the toy later - Kids from group b later rated the toy as really desirable because the reason for them not playing with it right now was that they would get badly punished. - Kids from group a later rated the toys as not fun because they had come up with the cognition: "I'm not playing with that toy because it's probably not that fun" because there was not sufficient external justification for why they weren't doing it
80