Psychology: Attachment 1 & 2 Flashcards

(48 cards)

1
Q

What is the Strange Situation designed to Measure?

A

A way of measuring types of attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Name the 3 behavioural Categories used in the Strange situation

A
  • Secure attachment - ‘I trust you’
  • Insecure avoidant - ‘I don’t care’
  • Insecure resistant - ‘I don’t trust you’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How long does each episode last?

A

3 minutes - mother and baby, stranger enters, mother leaves, mother returns ect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What scale is used to rate the behaviours?

A

Recording of child’s response to 5 behavioural categories:
1. Proximity-seeking to caregiver
2. Using parent as secure base
3. Accepting comfort from stranger
4. Separation anxiety
5. Response to being re-united

Each category rated on 0-7 scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does a securely attached child behave in the Study?

A

Explore happily, but go back to their mothers regularly, moderate stranger and separation anxiety but accept comfort from caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does an insecure avoidant child behave in the Study?

A

Explore freely but don’t seek secure base, no reaction when the mother leaves and doesn’t make effort to make contact when mother returns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does an insecure resistant child behave in the Study?

A

Seek breather proximity than other babies and explore less, high levels of stranger and separation anxiety and refuse comfort from the mother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were the % of each attachment type in Ainsworth’s original study?

A
  • Type B: Secure attachment ( (66 %)– some separation
    anxiety, high willingness to explore (use parent as
    secure base), high stranger anxiety, enthusiastic reunion
  • Types A: Insecure-avoidant (22%) – low separation
    anxiety, high willingness to explore (but don’t used
    parent as a secure base), low stranger anxiety,
    indifferent reunion
  • Type C: Insecure-resistant (12%)– very high separation
    anxiety, low willingness to explore (don’t use parent as a secure base), high
    stranger anxiety, seeks and rejects on reunion (they want comfort but reject it at the same time)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why does the study have good reliability? (hint: consistency)

A

*Good Reliability – shows good inter-observer
reliability (observers agree on which attachment type a child is). This is because the
SS is done under controlled conditions and has clear behavioural categories which are easy to observe. It is also carried out in a controlled environment which mean extraneous variables are reduced and the study can be replicated
under the same conditions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why does the study have high validity? (hint: accuracy)

A

*High Validity – the Strange situation is good at
predicting outcomes for children which suggests
it is an accurate measure of attachment. For example, securely attached children are more likely to have secure romantic relationships and
do better at school.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why is the Study culture bound? Give an example

A

*The test may be Culture-Bound. The SS may
not have the same meaning when used to measure attachment in other cultures outside of the USA. Cultural differences in
child-rearing mean children respond differently to the strange situation and so
may appear insecure when they are actually secure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How might a child’s temperament affect their behaviour in the study. How does this affect the validity?

A

*Is the study actually measuring attachment type or Temperament? e.g Some children are shy and may
appear resistant but actually have secure
attachment. Others may be confident and appear
avoidant but are actually securely attached – so the
SS may not accurately measure attachment type.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the 4th attachment type? Why is this a limitation of Ainsworth’s research?

A

*Is there a 4th
attachment type? – Disorganised attachment. This is a mixture of insecure resistant and insecure avoidant attachment. This challenges Ainsworth’s original categories as she only included 3 categories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain why Van izjendoorn’s study is described as a meta-analysis

A
  • Meta-analysis of 32 studies in 8 countries– all used strange
    situation to measure attachment type.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How many studies, countries and babies did he study?

A

8 countries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the most common attachment found worldwide?

A

Secure Attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Which country has the highest levels of insecure avoidant children?

A

Germany had highest amounts of insecure avoidant (33%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Which country has the highest levels of insecure resistant children?

A

Israel (30%) and Japan (26%) had highest amounts of insecure resistant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Which country has the highest levels of secure attachment?

A

Britain had highest secure (75%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

How many times higher are variations within a country than between countries?

A

More variation within each country than between countries

21
Q

What did Tronick find about Attachment in the Efe Tribe?

22
Q

Explain the reasons for the cultural variations:
Why is secure most common worldwide?
Why does Germany have higher numbers of avoidant children compared to other countries?
Why does Japan have higher numbers of resistant children compared to other countries?
Why does Israel have higher numbers of resistant children compared to other countries?

A

Why do German children have higher levels of Insecureavoidant than other countries? German children are generally raised to be independent and so may appear to be
avoidant but may actually be securely attached.

Why does Japan have higher numbers of insecure-resistant
than other Countries? Children in Japan are rarely separated form their mothers in the 1st year and so may appear very
clingy and resistant in the SS but may actually be securely attached

Why does the UK have higher numbers of Secure
attachment? Children in the UK are raised in a similar way to the USA where they are used to being regularly separated from their caregiver and so the Strange situation is not too
distressing for them

23
Q

Why is having a large sample size a strength of the research?

A

Large Samples – 32 studies, 8 countries, 2000 babies. G
So a representative sample

24
Q

Why is the research criticised for being culture bound?

A
  • Samples may not represent the whole culture – (In Japan, mainly rural communities were used)
25
Jin et al (2012)
A Korean Study using the SS Found higher levels of insecure resistant compared to other countries (but similar to Japan) This may be because babies are nearly separated from mothers.
26
Simonella et al (2014)
An Italian study using the SS Found lower levels of secure attachment than previous studies This may be because more children are spending time in day care
27
Outline what is meant by interactional synchrony (hint: mirror actions and emotions, coordinated response,Imitating/mimicking facial expressions or gestures)
The temporal coordination of micro-level social behaviour’ Mother and infant reflect both the actions and emotions of the other (mirror). They do this in a coordinated (synchronised) way.
28
Outline what is meant by reciprocity (dance, both initiate, turn taking)
* Means interaction is 2 way * Both mother and infant respond to each other’s signals and each elicits a response from the other * Described as a ‘dance’ between mother and baby
29
What did Melzoff and Moore measure in their study?
Meltoff and Moore (1977) observed Interactional synchrony between mothers and 2 week old infants Adult displayed 3 different facial expressions and 3 different gestures.
30
What did they find? Which type of Care-giver interaction does it support?
Response of the child rated - found an association between the action of the child and expression / gesture of adult (rated by researchers independently)
31
Describe Tronick’s still face experiment
Mother interacts with child. Mother stops responding. Child tries to get response out of mother and gets upset
32
How does Tronick’s study support the importance of caregiver infant interactions?
Reciprocity is important in the development of high quality attachments
33
Why is it hard to tell the purpose/meaning behind the interactions? What don’t they tell us?
* Observations don’t tell us the meaning behind the interactions e.g. Are they important for attachment/development? Are infants’ actions conscious or deliberate?
34
Why is research into caregiver interactions socially sensitive?
35
Research uses controlled observations – why is this a strength?
36
How did Field study the role of the father? What did he measure?
37
What did Field find about the role of the father?
Field (1978) filmed 4 month old babies in face to face interaction with mothers and Fathers. If fathers are the primary caregiver, they spend as much time smiling, imitating and holding infants as the mother.
38
What did Schaffer and Emerson (1964) find about the role of the father? (hint: primary and secondary attachments)
Schaffer and Emerson (1964) found that the majority of infants attach to their mother’s first at around 7 months and shortly after form secondary attachments to other family members including the father. 75% of the children had formed attachments to their father by the age of 18 months.
39
What did Grossman (2002) find about the father’s role in play?
* Research shows fathers have an important role in play and stimulation and less so in nurturing (Grossman 2002) * When fathers do take on the caregiving role, they adopt behaviour more typical of mothers Grossman (2002) found that the quality of a fathers play with infants was related to the quality of a child’s attachment in adolescence.
40
What did MacCallum and Golombok (2004) find about children raised in same sex families? What does this tell us about the role of the father?
MacCallum and Golombok (2004) have found that children growing up in single or same-sex parent (2 female) families do not develop any differently from those in two-parent heterosexual families.
41
Why is it hard to draw conclusions from research about the role of the father? Hint: some research focus on fathers as primary attachment, others on secondary
Research focuses on different things. Field focuses on whether mother or father is primary attachment figure where as Grossman research role of play with father's. Hard to make comparisons as the focus on different things.
42
Describe what happens in the Asocial Stage (first few weeks)
Babies are interested in discovering the world around them, however they have a similar response to objects and humans. Accept comfort from any adult
43
Describe what happens at the Indiscriminate stage (2-7 months)
Show a preference for people. Recognise and prefer familiar adults. Usually accept comfort from any adult.
44
Describe what happens at the Specific attachment stage (from 7 months)
Start to show anxiety towards strangers and separation anxiety from one particular adult (mother 65% cases) – called the primary attachment figure (not necessarily who the child spends the most time with)
45
Describe what happens at the multiple attachment stage (shortly after stage 3)
Children become attached to other people who they have regular contact with –secondary attachments
46
Proximity
People try and stay physically close to those they are attached to
47
Separation Anxiety
People are distressed when an attachment figure leaves their presence
48
Secure Base Behaviour
Infants regularly return to their attachment figure when playing