Psychopathology Flashcards
(123 cards)
What are the four definitions of abnormality?
- Statistical infrequency/ deviation from statistical norms
- Deviation from social norms
- Failure to function adequately
- Deviation from ideal mental health
What is statistical infrequency?
This is deciding if a behaviour is abnormal by looking at the number of times we observe it. A statistically rare behaviour would be seen as ‘abnormal’. Any ‘unusual behaviour’ is ‘normal’ and any behaviour that is different is ‘abnormal’. This would be more than a trait that is more than 2 standard deviations from the mean.
What are strengths of using statistical infrequency to determine abnormality?
- Statistical infrequency is an obvious and relatively quick and easy way to define abnormality
- Real life application - it’s relatively easy to determine abnormality using psychometric tests developed using statistical methods. Most patients with a mental health disorder will undergo a psychometric measurement of their symptoms in comparison to the norm.
What are some limitations of using statistical infrequency to determine abnormality?
- Desirability of behaviour - Many behaviours are rate but considered high,y desirable (High IQ, great athletic ability). It is difficult to know how far you have to deviate from the average to be considered abnormal.
- Benefits of a label - Someone who is living a happy and fulfilled life may not benefit from a label regardless of how ‘abnormal’ they may be considered. In fact a label of ‘abnormal! Could be detrimental not helpful.
- Some behaviours are statistically very frequent, but still classified as abnormal, for example, depression.
- Cultural and historical relativism - what is statistically frequent and acceptable in one culture and time period is not necessarily the norm in another. For example, arranged marriages are statistically frequent in India, Marijuana smoking is statistically frequent in Jamaica.
What are social norms?
Behaviours that society sets up to rule based on a set of moral standards.
Give an example of a deviation from a social norm and suggest why they are considered so
Antisocial Personality Disorder (psychopathy)
- Lacks empathy, aggressive, impulsive and irresponsible
- Accoridng to the DSM-V; one important symptom in diagnosing antisocial personality disorder is an ‘absence of pro-social internal standards associated with failure to conform to lawful or culturally normative ethical behaviour’.
What is a strength of using deviation from social norm to define abnormality?
Has real life application in terms of diagnosis, for example, antisocial personality disorder
What are limitations of using deviation from social norms to define abnormality?
- Historical issues: Until early 20th century, unmarried women who become pregnant were interred in mental institutions. Until 1967 in the UK homosexual acts were criminal offences. Until 1973 in USA homosexuality was a mental disorder.
- Cultural issues: Russia - a diagnosis of insanity was used to detain political dissidents. Japan - you are deemed insane if you don’t want to work. Western societies - you can plead insanity as a defence - Lorena Babbitt cut off her husband’s penis - pleaded insanity. African/Indian cultures consider it normal to talk to the dead
Social control - This approach has been used as a form of social control, for example, black slaves running away were diagnosed with drapetomania
What is the failure to function adequately?
An inability to cope with day-to-day life caused by psychological distress or discomfort which may lead to harm of self or others. E.g. someone with depression may only be diagnosed with the disorder if it hinders their normal functioning (work, socialising etc.)
How is failure to function adequately used to determine abnormality?
Rose ham and Seligman (1989) propose six major features which indicate a person may not be functioning adequately. The more of the features that an individual has, the more likely they are to be considered abnormal.
What are the 6 major features which indicate that a person may not be functioning adequately and describe them?
- Personal distress - person may get aggressive/angry. They may cry often.
- Maladaptive behaviour - Self harm/suicidal ideology
- Irrationally and incomprehensibility - There appears to be no good reason why the person should choose to heave that way. They don’t listen to reason or common sense. Irrational - doing badly at a test - thinking you will fail all exams in future.
- Unpredictability and loss of control - Behvaiour is often highly unpredictable and inappropriate for the situation. Someone suddenly shouting, showing anger for no apparent reason.
- No longer adheres to interpersonal rules/observer discomfort - Someone invading your personal space when speaking to you
- Violation of morals - Breaking laws, taboos, unwritten social rules
What is a strength of using failure to function adequately as a definition of abnormality?
Patients perspective - attempts to include the subjective xperience of the individual. Although an individual’s assessment of their own distress may be very subjective,it does at least acknowledge the experience of the patient as important.
What are some limitations of using failure to function adequately as a definition of abnormality?
- Who decides the acceptable level of functioning? - Deciding whether someone is distressed or something is distressing is subjective. Some patients although they may say that they are distressed may be judged as not suffering.
- Context of the behaviour - Some people engage in behaviours that could be considered maladaptive or harmful to self, but we wouldn’t class them as abnormal. People who have alternative lifestyles may appear to function inadequately, for example, a New Age traveller not having a permanent address, or a base jumper taking part in a sport with a high mortality rate.
- Some people have psychological disorders but still function adequately
- Labelling - a label gives a stigma that may stick around long after the problem has gone. Can affect employment prospects and personal relationships.
How can deviation from ideal mental health be judged?
Marie Jahoda came up with the PRAISE list of terms that everyone with ideal mental health should have:
Personal Growth (Self actualisation: should reach your potential)
Reality perception (should know what’s real)
Autonomy (should be independent and our ability to make our own decisions)
Integration (should ‘fit in’ with society and be able to cope with stressful situations)
Self-attitudes (should be positive: high self esteem)
Environmental mastery (should cope in your environment, be able to function at work and in relationships, adjust to new situations and solve problems)
What is a strength of using the deviation from ideal mental health as a definition of abnormality?
- Comprehensive - covers a broad range of criteria. This covers all aspects of mental health and makes us aware of all the different factors which can affect our mental health.
What are some limitations of using deviation from ideal mental health as a definition of abnormality?
- Cultural relativism - cultural bound - autonomy is valued in Western individualistic cultures but less so in non-western collectivist cultures where community values are more important.
- Difficult, if not impossible to meet all the criteria, therefore is everyone mentally unhealthy - self actualisation - very few people reach full potential. It’s unrealistic.
What is a phobia?
A phobia is an anxiety disorder, which interferes with daily living. It’s an instance of irrational fear that produces a conscious avoidance of the feared object or situation.
How does the DSM-V classify your phobia as being valid?
- Marked and persistent fear of a specific object or situation
- Exposure to the phobic stimulus nearly always produces a rapid anxiety response
- Fear of the phobic object or situation is excessive
- The phobic stimulus is either avoided or responded to with great anxiety
- The phobic reactions interfere significantly with the individual’s working or social life, so there’s constant distress about the phobia
What is the DSM-V?
A reference book used by mental health professionals to diagnose and classify mental disorders.
What is a specific phobia?
A phobia of a specific object
What is social anxiety?
A phobia of a social situation such as public speaking
What is agoraphobia?
Phobia of being outside or in public space