Psychophysical tests in optometric practice: assessing defective dark adaptation Flashcards
what 3 things are psychophysical procedures developed for
- measure thresholds
- aim to give accurate results
- aim to give reliable results
give an example of when you measure threshold in practice
resolution threshold or contrast threshold i.e. being able to detect some kind of stimulus
what 3 key points have to be considered when carrying out psychophysical procedures
- with the fewest number of stimulus presentations (ask least amount of questions)
- without requiring sophisticated judgements from the observer (just yes or no, left or right etc = basic)
- with minimal opportunities for psychological bias (don’t want their psychology to affect results)
what does a visual psychophysical procedure involve
presenting visual stimuli that vary along one of a number of possible dimensions
what is the ideal procedure when carrying out a psychophysical test
all but one parameter kept constant
i.e. just change one parameter of vision we’re interested in, e.g. if measuring VA’s, the only parameter we want to change is the size of the letter & so contrast, spacing of letters etc must stay constant. so the only thing we are trying to adjust is the one thing we’re trying to take a measure of
give 3 example of visual psychophysical procedures and what they measure
- visual acuity measures threshold for resolution (MAR)
- amplitude of accommodation measures threshold for near resolution
- near point of convergence measures threshold for BSV
how is the Bailey Lovie (logmar) chart a better psychophysical test of resolution than the Snellen chart
because the only factor that changes as you go down is the size of the letters
why is the Snellen chart not as good as a psychophysical test for resolution than the Bailey Lovie LogMar chart
because the crowding of letters also changes as you go down the chart
list the 3 classical psychophysical methods
- method of adjustment
- method of limits
- method of constant stimuli
what is the threshold when using the method of adjustment technique
point where stimulus just seen (or average of ascending and descending trials)
explain how an ascending trial works
start with a target that can’t be seen & increase its intensity until its just visible = threshold
explain how a descending trial works
start with a target that can definitely be detected & decrease its intensity until it just disappears = threshold
describe how a method of adjustment psychophysical technique is used in optometric practice
measure range for near vision using RAF rule, push up & push down method
“bring text towards you until the text becomes blurry”
= reading the chart until the text becomes blurry and then move it away until it becomes blurry again.
here the px is changing the stimulus i.e. method of adjustment
list the 3 advantages of method of adjustment
- fastest technique of measuring threshold
- good for obtaining an estimate
- subject likely to pay more attention - as your asking them to make the adjustment
what is the disadvantage of method of adjustment
psychophysical bias - difference in confidence
e.g. confidence px will try hard & a nervous px will not try as hard to meet threshold limit
describe how determining the threshold with method of limits psychophysical technique works
adjustment of intensity in regular steps until threshold is reached. can be ascending or descending (not gradual, but step wise, from seen to unseen and vice versa)
when is an ascending limits method used in optometric practice, how and why
often used in dark adaptometry = the measurement of thresholds during dark adaptation
i.e. measuring a px’s threshold as they adjust to the dark, so dont want to present a light stimuli as that will light adapt the px, so start with ascending dim light & increase until they can just see it. start with something below their threshold & increase intensity until its just detected.
when is a descending limits method used in optometric practice, how and why
in letter charts e.g. pelli robson (contrast chart) or Bailey Lovie LogMar chart
start with a stimulus intensity e.g. contrast that the px can definitely detect & decrease the contrast step wise down the chart until can’t detect the letters anymore, threshold = last group of letters which able to read. also used in va charts where decrease the size of letters step wise as go down.
because good for building patient confidence
what is an advantage of method of limits psychophysical technique
quick and simple
list the 3 disadvantages of method of limits psychophysical technique
- errors of habituation - if constantly have to give the same answer, they get used to it e.g. in cross cyl px will keep saying 1 as habitual to it
- subject know what to expect - errors of anticipation, px guesses what next one will look like so respond based on what their expecting rather than what they see
- differences in confidence between subjects (psychophysical bias) - when measuring va’s, some px will guess the letters & get a better result & others will respond they’re really sure with what they can see
name a modified method of limits
staircase method
explain how the staircase method works using intensity as an example
keep changing direction of intensity of our stimulus e.g. if start with a stimulus that px can definitely see and decrease the intensity, but they can still see it, decrease the intensity again & then they can’t see it anymore, but instead of taking that as our threshold, we make the stimulus brighter again, so start increasing brightness in steps until the stimulus reappears again & then change direction & make it dimmer, so keep zig zagging around the threshold by increasing and decreasing the intensity. each of the points where we changed the direction of the threshold = the average of reversal points i.e. R1+R2+R3+R4+R5+R6+R7/7
how do you achieve more accurate results from the staircase method if limits
the more reversals of threshold give more accurate results
how does the more reversals of threshold in the staircase method of limits give more accurate results
minimises affect of habituation and anticipation