public policy 8 Flashcards

(33 cards)

1
Q

advocacy coalition framework

A

policy dynamics of conflict and struggle between advocacy coalitions within a specific policy subsystem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

policy belief system: deep core

A

fundamental values that are often implicit and apply to many policy areas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

policy belief system: policy core

A

values specific to a policy area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

policy belief system: secondary aspects

A

choice of instruments to achieve specific values and goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

policy stability

A

the balance of power (resources, authority & information) between advocacy coalitions are stable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

policy changes: deep core

A

changes are unlikely, but can happen because of external pressures or fundamental changes in the system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

policy changes: policy core

A

changes in balance of power between advocacy coalition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

policy changes: secondary aspects

A

policy learning, feedback

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

policy monopoly

A

incremental policy development within a stable policy subsystem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

policy punctuations

A

dramatic non-incremental turning points of policy rationality (destruction / construction of policy monopoly)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

policy stability

A

policy topics without major public and political attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

incremental

A

gradual and marginal policy change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

non-incremental

A

disrupt stakeholders network & rapid and fundamental

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

policy innovation

A

new policy in new area when new situations have emerged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

policy succession

A

replacement of a policy without changing the fundamental ideas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

policy maintenance

A

incrementalism, secondary adjustments to established policy

17
Q

policy termination

A

deconstruction of a policy, because it was successful, or because it doesn’t fit anymore / didn’t work / new regulations

18
Q

first order learning

A

learning focused on improving policy instruments (policy maintenance)

19
Q

second order learning

A

choice and selection of policy instruments (policy succession)

20
Q

third order learning

A

aims and priorities of policies (policy innovation or termination)

21
Q

powering

A

interest driven nature of policy making

22
Q

puzzling

A

finding & solving public problems

23
Q

reflective learning

A

open process where fundamental policy ideas are discussed

24
Q

epistemic learning

A

address fundamental ideas & learning promoted by certified actors

25
learning through bargaining
high tractability and multiple actors are involved
26
learning in the shadow of hierarchy
high tractability and high certification of actors
27
comprehensive rationalist model
ignoring the complexity of problems
28
single loop learning
most simple feedback, no search for causes
29
double loop learning
more analytical of causes of problems
30
epistemic communities
networks of experts in a particular domain, held together by a shared set of beliefs
31
frame alignment
connecting frames to have a broader shared interpretation of situation and trigger collective action
32
learning as critical frame reflection
role of researcher not to resolve policy controversies, but to help involved actors with reframing
33
4 causes of path dependency
past policies define the today playing field, policies follow a historic sequence of events, group think & self-referentiality