pyschology Flashcards

1
Q

how many participants are in milgram

A

40 male

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

age of the participants in milgram

A

ages 20-50

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

where was milgram study conducted

A

new haven America

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what occupation did the participants in milgram study do

A

various occupations eg salesman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how many participants where in sperry study

A

11 spilt brain participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what surgery did sperrys participate undergo

A

hemisphere disconnection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

who did freud observe

A

little Hans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was the age if little Hans during the study

A

ages 3-5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how participants did bandora at el have

A

72
36 boys 36 girls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

where was the participants from bandoras study from

A

stanford university in California

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

age of the participants in bandoras study

A

ages 3-5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

participants in bocchiaros pilot study

A

92 vu university students

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

participants in bocchiaros main study

A

149 under graduates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what was the participants in the main study of bocchiaros studies given for completing the study

A

£7 or course credit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how many participants in bocchiaros predicting task

A

138

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how many participants in chaneys study

A

32 participants
22males 10 females

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

ages of participants in chaneys study

A

ages 1 1/2 to 6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

who gave consent in chaneys

A

the children parents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

how did the self reports get conducted in chaneys study

A

questionnaire and phone interviews

20
Q

loftus and palmer findings

A

smashed condition estimated speed of 40.8mph compared to contacted which was 31.8

21
Q

loftus and palmer 2 study findings

A

16 smashed participants said they saw broken glass compared to 7 in hit condition and 6 in controlled

22
Q

where did the students in Casey study come from and how many

A

562 from stanford university nursing school

23
Q

how many participants completed in self report in casey study in their 20s 30s 40s

A

20s=155 completed self reports
30s=135 completed self reports
40s=59 completed self reports- experiment 2=27

24
Q

how many and what age where the participants in grant study

A

39 participants
17-56 age

25
how many boys and girls in grant study
17 females 23 males
26
what did grant study
context dependant memory how good student could recall memory for a test and if it could be improved
27
Moray experiment 1 sample
Sample: no sample
28
Moray experiment 1 procedure
Moray used dichotic listening task in lm ear a shadow would read a passage of fiction and in the left ear a word list repeated 3 times and were asked to ignore it.
29
Moray experiment 1 Procedure 2
Recognition test 21 words they had to identify what they recognised. 7 words were fictional. 7 were rejected message. 7 words weren’t in either message.
30
Moray experiment 1 conclusion
Selective attention does happen Unattended information isn’t processed and therefore isn’t recognised. It shows that there is a back up against some information
31
Moray experiment 2 sample
Sample: 12ps
32
Moray exp 3 sample
Sample: 28 ps
33
Simon and Chabris sample
228 consenting volunteered undergraduates paid large candy only 192ps data was used
34
Simon and chabris procedure
Sp watched one 75 second video of basketball they had to count the passes for wither white or black team depending on condition. Randomly in the video a umbrella woman or gorilla would walk left to right of the screen
35
Simon and chabris questions to ps after watching the video
Did you notice anything unusual Did you notice anything other than the 6 players Did you see a gorilla or woman carrying a umbrella walking across the screen
36
Simon and chabris IV and DV
IV easy v hard, white team v black team, transparent v opaque and gorilla v umbrella DV number of participants who noticed the unexpected event
37
Kohlberg aim
To investigate moral development and devise stages of moral development
38
Kohlberg sample
75 American boys
39
Kohlberg conducted a
Longitudinal study as it investigated children ever 3 years from 10-16 to 24-28
40
Simon and chabris aim
To build on previous research into divided visual attention and to further investigate inattentional blindness. To see if a prolonged visual event can be missed.
41
Simon and chabris procedure for easy and hard condition
Ps watched 75 sec basketball game they had to watch either black or white team the team had to count all the number of passes between the teams (easy) or separately count bounces and aerial passes the team made (hard)
42
What is the unexpected event in Simon and chabris
A tall woman with and umbrella would walk past the screen left to right for 5 seconds or a woman dressed as a gorilla
43
Simon and chabris conlusion
We are likely to miss information when we are attending something else ( inattentional blindness) and the more concentrated on a task the more likely we are to miss other information
44
Levine sample
Large cities in 28 countries in large cities and was the members of the population
45
Levine helping stages
3 different helping stages Where the victim dropped a cane Whether the victim was drunk Wherther the victim hurt leg or dropped a magazine They were all men
46
Levine research design/method
Independent measures and field experiment
47
Levine conclusion
Helping behaviour does differ between countries The lower wealth of the country the more likely for citizens to offer help