Q&A Flashcards

(59 cards)

1
Q
  1. Choose the alternative that restates as an imperative the following italicized statement: Kofi is working harder than Kwame.
A

A. Kofi, are you working harder than Kwame?
B. Kofi, you must work harder than Kwame. ✅
C. Amazing! I can’t believe Kofi is working harder than Kwame!
D. Kwame, you are not working as hard as Kofi.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  1. Choose the alternative that best expresses an interrogative using the meaning content of the particular declarative sentence in italics:
    This plant needs more water.
A

A. Give this plant more water.
B. Please, did the technician water this plant today?
C. Does this plant need more water? ✅
D. It’s so tedious; this plant needs more and more water!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  1. From the following items, choose the one which is a sentence fragment:
A

A. What are you doing?
B. Go now; otherwise, you will be late.
C. Gracious God, look at what you are doing; are you mad?
D. “Light soup.” ✅

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  1. Of the following items, identify which best illustrates an emotive expression:
A

A. Rice and stew.
B. Come quickly; we have a long journey.
C. Where are we?
D. Gracious God, are you mad? ✅

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  1. Which of the following might be described as both a moral judgment and also an imperative?
A

A. Are you going to the farm tomorrow?
B. You can’t leave the church service without giving alms for the poor! ✅
C. This is the last time you will be able to get transport to Accra before tomorrow.
D. He’s so handsome; don’t you think so?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  1. Identify which of the following is a genuine interrogative:
A

A. Can’t you keep quiet?
B. Is your cousin a graduate of KNUST or of Legon? ✅
C. Don’t you just wish you could own such a car as that?
D. Isn’t Miss Ghana 2009 the most beautiful young woman anyone has ever seen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  1. Consider which of the following is a sentence fragment:
A

A. Last year’s Miss Ghana. ✅
B. Meet Miss Ghana, a graduate of KNUST.
C. When are we supposed to graduate?
D. How can you ask such a question? How rude can you be?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  1. What kind of linguistic utterance (speech act) is being illustrated by the following sentence in italics?
    Tolerating corruption, extortion, and confiscation in public funds amounts to spiritual heresy and will be avenged upon the generations yet unborn.
A

A. Value judgment (moral) ✅
B. Emotive utterance
C. Value judgment (non-moral)
D. Factual statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  1. Identify which of the following clearly is NOT a (moral or non-moral) value judgment:
A

A. Is it true that you have more cousins than I do? ✅
B. This house is the most magnificent example of the Tudor period in the province.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  1. If a statement has less empirical content, it is easy to falsify it.
A

A. True ✅
B. False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  1. Violation of the following types of law can attract some kind of penalty or reprobation EXCEPT:
A

A. Moral law ✅
B. Customary law
C. Natural law
D. Constitutional law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  1. Which type of law is not dependent upon social observance or enforcement by a governing agency in order to remain effective?
A

A. Natural law ✅
B. Customary law
C. Constitutional law
D. Moral law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  1. Which of the following is not a natural law-like statement?
A

A. All salts must dissolve in water.
B. All metals must expand when heated.
C. All mammals must have oxygen in order to live.
D. All human beings must obey God. ✅

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  1. Which of the following methods of reasoning has the danger of resulting in the fallacy of confusing a correlation with a causal connection?
A

3. Joint method of agreement and difference ✅

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  1. The joint method of agreement and difference is a way of conjecturing that:
A

3. Two things: that event A was a sufficient condition for event B, and that an event of type A is a necessary condition for the type B event. ✅

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  1. If we want to explain events occurring before the evolution of Homo sapiens, which type of law would NOT feature at all in our hypotheses?
A

1. Civil ✅

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q
  1. Which one of the following statements is false?
A

4. All of the statements (A-D) above are false. ✅

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q
  1. Consider the following passage and choose the option which BEST analyzes the argument:
A

1. The premises of the argument do not provide relevant evidence for the conclusion. ✅

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q
  1. Read again the italicized passage presented for Question 20 above.
    Which of the following fallacies is committed in that argument?
A

A. Fallacy of semi-attached figures
B. Fallacy of illegitimate appeal to authority
C. False analogy
D. Fallacy of misplaced vividness ✅

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q
  1. How would you evaluate statements (i) and (ii) below?
    (i) The weatherman said it should rain tomorrow, so let’s wait and see if there will be dry weather for the match.
    (ii) The government should not burden itself with a Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice; people will just cause trouble if they are not happy, and it is too expensive for a developing country.
A

A. None of the options below (B-E) evaluates (i) and (ii) correctly.
B. (i) is a value judgment, and (ii) is a factual statement waiting for verification. ✅
C. Both (i) and (ii) are factual predictions.
D. Both (i) and (ii) express moral value judgments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q
  1. What type of fallacy is represented by the passage in italics below?
    There is ample evidence to prove that having a very badly sunburned finger causes fatal lung cancer. I know this because every corpse with advanced lung cancer that I examined as a medical student had stains all over the first and the second fingers, usually of the right hand.
A

A. Genetic fallacy
B. Post hoc ergo propter hoc
C. Confusing cause with effect
D. Ignoring a common underlying cause ✅

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q
  1. A valid deductive inference is one whose conclusion ought to be accepted if… (complete with the best alternative):
A

A. All the premises are true; this is necessary for the argument to be valid. ✅
B. At least one of the premises is true; this is sufficient for validity.
C. None of A-D captures the requirements for an argument to be deductively valid.
D. All the premises are either imperatives or normative statements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q
  1. Consider the proverb in italics and choose the best one among the alternatives to describe its function:
    One head does not go into council.
A

A. A factual description of the limitations of heads in the world.
B. An operational definition of the term “head.”
C. A value judgment or a directive about how decision-making in governance should be conducted. ✅
D. A syllogistic argument about marital counseling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q
  1. Value judgments are expressions that:
A

A. Describe the world as it is
B. Prescribe how the world should be ✅
C. Provide operational definitions

25
27. The difference between empirical generalizations and normative principles is that:
A. Empirical generalizations are always true. B. Normative principles state how things are. C. Empirical generalizations report observed facts, while normative principles prescribe standards. ✅ D. Normative principles are based on empirical evidence.
26
28. A deductive argument is characterized by:
A. The impossibility of the conclusion being false if the premises are true. ✅ B. The conclusion being probably true if the premises are true. C. The premises providing no support for the conclusion. D. The conclusion being a general statement.
27
29. An inductive argument:
A. Guarantees the truth of the conclusion if the premises are true. B. Suggests the conclusion is probably true based on the premises. ✅ C. Contains premises that are universal affirmations. D. Is always valid.
28
30. A statement is considered particular if:
A. It applies universally. B. Its reference class is finite and countable. ✅ C. It is an empirical generalization. D. It offers a stipulative definition.
29
31. The premises of a deductive argument:
A. Suggest but do not guarantee the conclusion. B. Guarantee the conclusion's truth. ✅ C. Are always in the form of universal affirmations. D. Are derived from empirical observations.
30
32. Validity in deductive arguments means:
A. The premises are likely true. B. If the premises are true, the conclusion cannot be false. ✅ C. The argument is based on strong evidence. D. The premises are universally accepted.
31
33. An argument is sound if:
A. It is valid and all its premises are true. ✅ B. It contains at least one false premise. C. It is inductive and strong. D. The conclusion is probably true.
32
34. A universal affirmation is a statement that:
A. Applies to no entities in a domain. B. States that all entities of a certain type possess a particular property. ✅ C. Is always false. D. Is based on a stipulative definition
33
35. Conditional statements are structured as:
A. If antecedent, then consequent. ✅ B. Either/or statements. C. Universal negations. D. Definitions providing the essence of a term.
34
36. Modus ponens is an argument form where:
A. If the antecedent is true, the consequent must also be true. ✅ B. Denying the antecedent automatically denies the consequent. C. The conclusion is valid regardless of the premises' truth. D. It utilizes universal negation to draw conclusions.
35
37. If it is raining, then the ground is wet. The ground is wet. Therefore, it...
A. Might rain. ✅ B. Is raining. C. Is not raining.
36
38. If you are a teacher, then you work at a school. You are not a teacher. Therefore, you...
A. work at a school B. do not work at a school C. might work at a school D. cannot be determined ✅
37
39. All cats are animals. All dogs are animals. Therefore, all dogs are...
A. cats B. not cats C. animals ✅ D. both A and C are correct
38
40. A student from XYZ University won the math competition. Therefore, all students from XYZ University...
A. are good at math B. won the math competition C. like math competitions D. none of the above ✅
39
41. You must study law, or you will not be successful. You did not study law. Therefore, you...
A. will be successful B. will not be successful ✅ C. might be successful in another field D. cannot determine success
40
42. After the new mayor was elected, crime rates dropped. Therefore, the new mayor...
A. caused crime rates to drop ✅ B. is responsible for crime C. improved the economy
41
43. If we allow students to redo tests, next they'll want to change their grades. Therefore, allowing test redos...
A. improves learning B. leads to grade inflation C. is a fair policy D. cannot determine the outcome ✅
42
44. Books are educational because they provide knowledge. Therefore, books are...
A. boring B. educational because they are books ✅ C. not educational D. expensive
43
45. Ice cream sales increase in the summer. Shark attacks also increase in the summer. Therefore, increasing ice cream sales...
A. cause shark attacks B. have no relation to shark attacks ✅ C. decrease shark attacks D. are a result of shark attacks
44
46. The law implies an obligation. Birds fly by law. Therefore, birds...
A. are obligated to fly B. fly by legal obligation C. fly according to natural laws ✅ D. none of the above is logically consistent
45
47. Every player on the team is outstanding. Therefore, the team...
A. is outstanding ✅ B. might not win the championship C. is made up of outstanding players only D. cannot assume the team's performance based on individual excellence
46
48. No dedicated student fails the test. John, a dedicated student, fails the test.
*Correct answer:* The statement is logically inconsistent and cannot be determined.
47
48. Therefore, John ...
A. was not truly dedicated B. is not a student C. can retake the test D. none of the above justifies his failure ✅
48
49. There is no evidence that ghosts do not exist. Therefore, ghosts ...
A. exist B. do not exist C. might exist D. existence cannot be determined by lack of evidence ✅
49
50. Children are like plants; both grow. Therefore, children ...
A. need water to grow B. grow towards sunlight C. require the same care as plants D. this analogy does not validly support the conclusion ✅
50
51. Criminals use smartphones. Therefore, anyone using a smartphone ...
A. is a criminal B. is under suspicion C. cannot be trusted D. none of the above is a valid conclusion ✅
51
52. The pet is either a cat or a dog. The pet is a cat. Therefore, the pet ..
A. cannot be a dog ✅ B. is not a pet C. is both a cat and a dog D. this does not exclude other possibilities
52
53. A famous actor says this diet pill works. Therefore, the diet pill ...
A. works B. is safe and effective C. is recommended by health professionals D. the actor's endorsement does not prove the pill's effectiveness ✅
53
54. All metals expand when heated. This rod is made of metal. So therefore, this rod will ...
A. melt when heated B. expand when heated ✅ C. shrink when heated D. dissolve when heated
54
55. There's a 70% chance of rain tomorrow according to the weather forecast. So therefore, it is ...
A. impossible to rain tomorrow B. certain to rain tomorrow C. likely to rain tomorrow ✅ D. going to snow instead
55
56. A new study suggests that eating blueberries improves memory in older adults. So therefore, consuming blueberries can ...
A. worsen memory B. do not affect memory C. improve memory in older adults ✅ D. make people dislike blueberries
56
57. Every swan observed in the park has been white. So, therefore, the next swan seen in the park will likely be:
A. black B. white ✅ C. multicolored D. invisible
57
58. A syllogism that violates the rule of having three and only three terms is guilty of:
A. fallacy of four terms ✅ B. begging the question C. equivocation D. non sequitur
58
59. For a syllogism to be valid, it must:
*2.* Have premises that logically lead to the conclusion ✅
59
60. The concept of "soundness" in an argument applies to:
*2.* Deductive arguments with true premises and valid reasoning ✅