Quiz 1 Flashcards
(42 cards)
Describe the steps in the sensory process
- 3 steps + examples
3 steps:
- Physical stimulus (eg. light, sound, odour)
- physiological response (pattern of electrical activity in sensory receptors, nerves, brain)
- sensory experience (see/hear/smell something)
list the techniques available to study each part of the sensory process.
a) physical –> physiological
- animal single-unit recording
- human brain imaging (MEG, PET, fMRI)
- event-related potentials
b) physiological –> sensory
- animal lesions
- human clinical studies
- human brain imaging
c) physical –> sensory
- behavioural techniques (ask them to describe their experience)
* easier to do behavioural since physio is expensive)
why is having a quantified spectrum of visible light useful?
- able to quantify colour based on wavelength
- people assigned words to wavelengths
- good to have it quantified because it is hard to prove that the “blue” one person sees is the same as the “blue” another person sees
What did Fechner invent?
Fechner came up with a way to define quantitative relationships between physical and psychological (subjective) events
- physical –> sensory = psychophysics
absolute threshold (what about a psychometric function? what does it mean if you have a low threshold?)
the minimal amount of stimulation necessary to just detect the presence of a stimulus
- weakest stimulus you can detect
when it’s for a psychometric function, the absolute threshold is the minimum amt of stimulation needed for a person to detect a stimulus 50% of the time
- becomes a statistic rather than just a value!
*low threshold = high sensitivity (good!)
psychometric function
a graph of stimulus value (eg. intensity) on the horizontal axis vs the subject’s responses (eg. proportion “yes”) on the vertical axis
- measures a single person multiple times (since every person is different!)
ogive
typical S shape of a real psychometric function
- never really a sharp change from not seeing a stimulus to seeing it –> varies from person to person
difference threshold
discrimination (type of perception), not just detection!
- the smallest difference between stimuli or a change in a stimulus that the observer noticed 50% of the time (aka JND –> just noticeable difference)
eg. if you say they look the same but they’re not, that stimulus is below your difference threshold
suprathreshold stimulus
above absolute threshold –> always detectable
Detection
(i) the method of constant stimuli
- select stimulus intensities above and below expected threshold
- present many trials of each intensity in random order
plot psychometric function - find where the 50% detection point is on the graph
Detection
(ii) the method of limits
a) descending series: stimulus intensity decreased in equal increments until response changes to “no”
b) ascending series: stimulus intensity increase in equal increments until response changes to “yes”
- alternate between ascending and descending + vary start point (so that people don’t just count trials)
- crossover point calculated for each series
- absolute threshold = avg of all crossover points
Detection
(iii) the method of adjustment
observer adjusts stimulus intensity using a potentiometer (volume, dimming, heat control, etc)
- experimenter randomly adjusts starting point
- calculate avg (mean) of these threshold adjustments
*some people take really long to fine-tune, others don’t
Discrimination
(i) the method of constant stimuli
- standard (fixed value) vs comparison (value that changes) stimuli presented together
magnitude of comparison (values above or below standard) varied in random order with many trials of each value - plot % “stronger” response vs comparison magnitude
- 0.75 point is the upper limit, 0.25 point is the lower limit (from graph)
- JND = (upper - lower)/2
- 0.50 point on graph is point of subjective equality (PSE) –> measure of accuracy (perfect accuracy would mean that PSE = standard)
Discrimination
(ii) the method of limits
- standard and comparison stimuli presented together
- descending: response changes from stronger to equal to weaker (stop)
- ascending: response changes from weaker to equal to stronger (stop)
- alternate between descending and ascending series; vary starting pt
- upper limit is crossover pt between stronger and equal on each series
- lower limit is crossover pt between equal and weaker on each series
eg. 9 = equal, 8 = weaker –> crossover point = 8.5 - JND = (avg upper - avg lower)/2
- PSE = (avg upper + avg lower)/2
Discrimination
(iii) the method of adjustment
- observer adjusts the comparison stimulus until it matches the standard stimulus
- experimenter randomly varies starting point
- JND = SD of the matches x 0.6745
advantages (2) and disadvantages (4) of the method of constant stimuli
pros: accurate and repeatable threshold values
cons: time-consuming (have to pick all the values beforehand), not good for tracking thresholds that change over time (eg. drug effects), not good for children or clinical patients (attention span), lots of data collected is far from threshold (inefficient since you have to throw away a lot of unrelated data)
advantages (2) and disadvantages (2) of the method of limits
pros: saves time (efficient), don’t have to tract out whole psychometric function
cons: error of habituation (alternate series reduces this, but requires extra series –> participants may forget to change their response of stronger/equal/weaker), error of anticipation (varying start point reduces this, but requires extra stimulus levels –> participants may count the number of times they say yes and do that every time)
advantages (2) and disadvantages (2) of the method of adjustment
- reason for use
pros: quick, participants like it (they’re in charge)
cons: not very accurate (within a person you will get diff threshold values each time) or repeatable (threshold all over the place)
* lots of ppl use this method as a preliminary method for the other two (rough estimate in order to pick values)
Describe how to measure detection thresholds with the staircase method
- adaptive method
- absolute threshold
- modern improvement
- starts out like method of limits
- stimulus intensity decreased in equal steps until you can’t detect
- then, stimulus intensity increased until you can detect
- keep going back and forth
- adaptive method: stimuli kept hovering around threshold by adapting test sequence to participant’s responses
- absolute threshold is the average of the cross over points at response reversals
- modern improvement for differences: make differences smaller and smaller –> when they can’t tell the difference anymore then make the difference bigger
advantages (3) and disadvantages (3) of the staircase method
- pros: efficient, most data collected around threshold; can be used to track threshold changes over time (if the staircase is going up or down over time) –> can measure drug effectiveness
- cons: researcher must change what they present based on participant’s response (cannot predesign expt); errors of habituation and anticipation (if there is only one staircase they realize what is going on –> interweave 2 staircases together –> computer decides trial)
Distinguish between “yes-no” and 2-alternative forced-choice paradigms
- worst performance possible?
- absolute threshold?
yes no is what everything we have done so far –> participant reports –> very subjective (cannot verify)
2-alternative forced-choice paradigm: more objective
- Participants must prove they can detect or discriminate the stimulus (circle on left or right? in which interval are the two stimuli different?)
- worst performance can be is 50% (chance) –> this paradigm measures % correct
- 75% is the absolute threshold, while 50% is the guess rate
explain the advantages offered by the two-alternative forced-choice paradigm
- lower thresholds –> performance is better (able to detect things they normally wouldn’t if they just have to say “yes” or “no”
- reduces non-sensory differences between participants (bias or criterion differences = guessing)
- can be used with the method of constant stimuli, limits, staircase method, but not the method of adjustment –> can’t leave it up to the participant
Weber’s law
- difference threshold is a constant proportion of the physical magnitude of the stimulus –> JND is larger for larger stimuli
delta i = ki
delta i = JND
i = physical magnitude of stimulus
k = constant (weber’s fraction) = delta i / i
Fechner’s law
- description
- equation
- variables
- comparison to weber’s law (graphical relationship)
- delta S
- suggested using JNDs (as a unit) to describe perceived intensity (quantify) –> describes the relationship between stimulus magnitude and resulting sensation magnitude (scaling)
S = k log R
S = sensation k = Weber fraction --> delta I / I R = stimulus level = I
- Weber’s law had JND (delta I) is larger for larger stimuli (I) –> linear
- Fechner used Weber’s findings to describe sensation –> assumed JNDs produced equal steps in sensation (delta S)
- sensory steps at the upper end of the scale required larger increases in stimulus intensity –> logarithmic relationship
- as stimulus intensity increases, sensation intensity increases rapidly at first, but then more slowly
- the change in S is constant, but the higher level the delta S is, the larger the change in I needs to be
- to calculate delta S find both S using the formula and then subtract
- to find the difference in JNDs do (bigger - smaller)/JND of smaller
(since it is in reference to how big the difference is compared to the smaller value)