Describe the steps in the sensory process
- 3 steps + examples
3 steps:
list the techniques available to study each part of the sensory process.
a) physical –> physiological
- animal single-unit recording
- human brain imaging (MEG, PET, fMRI)
- event-related potentials
b) physiological –> sensory
- animal lesions
- human clinical studies
- human brain imaging
c) physical –> sensory
- behavioural techniques (ask them to describe their experience)
* easier to do behavioural since physio is expensive)
why is having a quantified spectrum of visible light useful?
What did Fechner invent?
Fechner came up with a way to define quantitative relationships between physical and psychological (subjective) events
- physical –> sensory = psychophysics
absolute threshold (what about a psychometric function? what does it mean if you have a low threshold?)
the minimal amount of stimulation necessary to just detect the presence of a stimulus
- weakest stimulus you can detect
when it’s for a psychometric function, the absolute threshold is the minimum amt of stimulation needed for a person to detect a stimulus 50% of the time
- becomes a statistic rather than just a value!
*low threshold = high sensitivity (good!)
psychometric function
a graph of stimulus value (eg. intensity) on the horizontal axis vs the subject’s responses (eg. proportion “yes”) on the vertical axis
- measures a single person multiple times (since every person is different!)
ogive
typical S shape of a real psychometric function
- never really a sharp change from not seeing a stimulus to seeing it –> varies from person to person
difference threshold
discrimination (type of perception), not just detection!
- the smallest difference between stimuli or a change in a stimulus that the observer noticed 50% of the time (aka JND –> just noticeable difference)
eg. if you say they look the same but they’re not, that stimulus is below your difference threshold
suprathreshold stimulus
above absolute threshold –> always detectable
Detection
(i) the method of constant stimuli
Detection
(ii) the method of limits
a) descending series: stimulus intensity decreased in equal increments until response changes to “no”
b) ascending series: stimulus intensity increase in equal increments until response changes to “yes”
Detection
(iii) the method of adjustment
observer adjusts stimulus intensity using a potentiometer (volume, dimming, heat control, etc)
*some people take really long to fine-tune, others don’t
Discrimination
(i) the method of constant stimuli
Discrimination
(ii) the method of limits
Discrimination
(iii) the method of adjustment
advantages (2) and disadvantages (4) of the method of constant stimuli
pros: accurate and repeatable threshold values
cons: time-consuming (have to pick all the values beforehand), not good for tracking thresholds that change over time (eg. drug effects), not good for children or clinical patients (attention span), lots of data collected is far from threshold (inefficient since you have to throw away a lot of unrelated data)
advantages (2) and disadvantages (2) of the method of limits
pros: saves time (efficient), don’t have to tract out whole psychometric function
cons: error of habituation (alternate series reduces this, but requires extra series –> participants may forget to change their response of stronger/equal/weaker), error of anticipation (varying start point reduces this, but requires extra stimulus levels –> participants may count the number of times they say yes and do that every time)
advantages (2) and disadvantages (2) of the method of adjustment
- reason for use
pros: quick, participants like it (they’re in charge)
cons: not very accurate (within a person you will get diff threshold values each time) or repeatable (threshold all over the place)
* lots of ppl use this method as a preliminary method for the other two (rough estimate in order to pick values)
Describe how to measure detection thresholds with the staircase method
advantages (3) and disadvantages (3) of the staircase method
Distinguish between “yes-no” and 2-alternative forced-choice paradigms
yes no is what everything we have done so far –> participant reports –> very subjective (cannot verify)
2-alternative forced-choice paradigm: more objective
explain the advantages offered by the two-alternative forced-choice paradigm
Weber’s law
delta i = ki
delta i = JND
i = physical magnitude of stimulus
k = constant (weber’s fraction) = delta i / i
Fechner’s law
S = k log R
S = sensation k = Weber fraction --> delta I / I R = stimulus level = I