Quiz 2 Flashcards
(57 cards)
What is an operation definition?
One that defines a thing in such a way that it can be measured
If you want to examine the impact of amount of education on voting behaviors, which one is the independent variable and which one is the dependent variable?
Amount of education is the IV
Describe what an extraneous variable is (could be mediating, moderating, or confounding)
One that is not the focus of your study but that does have relationships with both the independent and dependent variables
Give an operational definiton for driving under the inluence
Driving with a blood alcohol content of .08 or greater
Give an operation definition of “sleep deprived”
Many answers are possible. Any one answer is right ass long as it related to the construct of intetest, is rational, and CAN BE MEASURED
What is the difference between systematic error and random error? which is worse?
Random measurement error occurs unpredictably. Systematic measurment error occurs the same way everyime for either all pariticpants completeing a measure for some sb-group of the participants.
Systematic error is worse because it consistently biases estimation
Explain what reliability is
Given that what is beaing measure has not actually changed, the measure of that construct is clsoe to the same every time the construct is measured
What are two types of reliability, and explain what they mean
- Test-Retest: you test a thing two times (close together in time) and get similiar answers
- Inter-rater reliabilityL two different raters using the same instrument rate a phenomenon similiarlily
3, Internal consistency h’s reliability: a chronbachs alpha statistic indicated all the items in an instrument relate to the same construct
what is validity
confidence that you are truly measuring the ocnstruct that you intend to measure
what is face validity
seems reasonable “on the face of it”
what is content validity
experts agree that the instrument captures the content that is necessary to measure and does not include content that does not relate to the construct
what is criteron related validity
alligns with an external measure (criterion) of the construct. Could include predictive validity, concurrent validity, or known groups validity
what is construct validity
a way to actually measure content validity by using other measurements to measure the construced being tapped (convergent) or onstruments that measure closely related but seperate constructs (discriminant).
What are three criteria necessary to infer causality
- the cause precedes the effect ( IV is established before hte DV)
- the IV and the DV are correlated
- Nothing other an the IV could have causes the change in the DV
What is internal validity
confidence that you can infer causality
What is a threat to internal validity?
maturation, history, selection effect, regression to the mean, testing effect, instrumentation changes, ambiguous temporal order
What are the characteristics of a true experimental desighn (randomized control trial)
1) random assignment to at least 2 groups
2) measurement of the construct of interest before and afer delivery of an intervention
3) the intervention is delivered to only of the two groups
Explain why true experimenta ldesign allows us to rule out threats to internal alisity
the design allwos us to measure change that would have taken place in the absensce of the intervention as well as change that is associated with the intervention
What is a quasi-experimental design? How is it different from experimental design?
Quasi-experimental desgn: Utilizes at least 2 groups, only one of which gets the desire intervention. However, the two groups are not randomly assigned. Other quasi-experimental designs include multiple measures/time series designs
Why is quasi-experimental design not as strong as / does not allow us to infer causality in the same way that eperimental design does?
Because the twp groups were not randomized, they may not be closely comparable. The groups may be non comparable on both measure characteristics and unmeasure characteristics. If this is so, those chaaracteristcs (rather than the independent variable) might have influence the change in thedependent variable
What can you do to strengthen your quasi-experimental design?
1) ensure that the two groups are comparable on as many measures as possible
2) add more pretest/post test measures
What kind of design is this? What is its strength at inferring causality and why? OXO
Pre-experimental, pretest/post-test design. Not strong because it does not include a comparison or control group- therefore we cannout rule out factors, such as maturation and historty, which might have been responsible for the change in the DV
What would you do to the following design to strneth the study you are carrying out?
1) add a control group, preferably or at lease a comparson group matched closely to the intervention group so you can see how similair people performed over time in absence of the intervention
2) ad a pre-test so you can determine how the intervention group was functioning before and after the intervention took palce
What is wrong with the design of this question:
Do you think it is untrue that higher education noes not teach students critical thinking?
it includes negatives