Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Psychology of Crime > Quiz 2 - Chapter 3 > Flashcards

Quiz 2 - Chapter 3 Flashcards

1
Q

How do people learn antisocial attitudes and behaviours or develop antisocial personalities in response to their environment?

A

Lack of parental supervision, pro-criminal role models, positive reinforcement from peers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Psychodynamic theories of crime

A

Crime results from inadequate control over internal aggressive and sexual impulses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Example of psychodynamic theory of crime

A

Homicide is not “a clearly defined impulse to kill” but the result of a killer being “intensely tormented” by conflicts rooted in childhood trauma, which they repress and then project/release

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Learning theories

A

Crime results from learning responses through direct environmental influence (e.g., punishments, rewards)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Give two examples of famous cases where crime resulted from issues during psychosexual development

A

Norman Bates from Psycho
Ed Kemper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Freud and antisocial behaviour

A

Humans are inherently antisocial
Experiences (especially during early childhood) promote or prevent the ego and superego’s ability to control the id’s pleasure-seeking and destructive impulses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Freud’s three components of the theory of personality structure

A

Id, ego, superego

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Id

A

Seeks immediate gratification regardless of consequences
Pleasure principle (sexual and aggressive)
Present at birth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Ego

A

Mediates between id’s primal needs and societal expectations (e.g., by delaying gratification)
Balances id and superego
Operates on reality principle
Develops throughout childhood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Sublimation
Example

A

Channel sexual and aggressive impulses into work
How civilization developed
E.g., da Vinci and repressed homosexuality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Superego

A

Internalization of societal expectations, as conveyed primarily by parents
Regulates behaviour according to moraliy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Conscience

A

Tells us right from wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ego-ideal

A

Represents socially accepted standards we aspire to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What three variants of the superego can result when we fail to identify with prosocial parental figures

A

Harsh superego
Weak superego
Deviant superego

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Harsh superego

A

Neurotic criminal who subconsciously punishes oneself to resolve guilt
Parents who were too strict and unloving, subconsciously want to be caught

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Weak superego

A

Psychopathic criminal without conscience who can’t regulate id’s impulses
Egocentric, impulsive, don’t feel guilt/shame or empathy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Deviant superego

A

Deviant identification with criminal parents
View them as good role models

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Unravelling Juvenile Delinquency by Glueck & Glueck (1950)

A

500 justice-involved and 500 non-justice-involved boys in Massachussetts
Attributed differences to parenting factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Juvenile delinquency study findings on parenting factors

A

Parents of justice-involved boys had more emotional disturbances, cognitive impairment, alcoholism, and criminality,
Were less educated, less likely to stay together, and less ambitious
Showed greater carelessness in the supervision of their children and often appeared neglectful
Families lacked cohesiveness and warm and respect for integrity of members
Children were less affectionately attached to parents, especially their fathers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Broad views on juvenile delinquency study

A

Findings were questioned
Overgeneralizations (e.g., can’t use findings to “predict” criminality)
Assumptions about causal ordering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What facts refute the juvenile delinquency study?

A

50% of maltreated children do not become antisocial or criminal
Criminality can reinforce delinquent personality traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Social control theory

A

Social controls prevent criminality
Delinquency results from weakened or broken bonds to society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

4 aspects of social control theory

A

Attachment
Commitment
Involvement
Belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Attachment
What kind of ego does this relate to?

A

Interest in others (e.g., parents, friends, teachers)
People don’t commit crimes because they value their attachment to others
Ego-ideal
*Attachment to criminal peers can lead to criminality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Commitment What kind of ego does this relate to?
Time and energy invested in conventional behaviour (e.g., education) People don't commit crimes because they don't want to jeopardize such investments Ego-ideal
26
Involvement
Time and energy used up on conventional behaviour (applies to teens especially) People don't commit crimes because they don't have the time or energy left
27
Belief What kind of ego does this relate to?
Conviction to the view that people should obey common rules People don't commit crimes because they respect moral codes and laws and their purposes Conscience/superego-ideal
28
General theory of crime
Lack of self-control in the presence of criminal opportunities is the main determinant of crime Crimes are "short lived, immediately gratifying, easy, simple, and exciting" and therefore appealing to those with low self-control
29
How does self-control relate to the general theory of crime?
Self-control as determined by parental quality Low self-control is consistently and universally linked to criminality Poor parental quality predicts poor self-control but self-control only partially mediates link between parental quality and criminality Only accounts for 19% of the variance in criminal behaviour Self-control is malleable and can improve with intervention
30
Learning
Change in pre-existing behaviour or mental processes that occurs as a result of experience
31
Learning relation to criminal behaviour
Criminal behaviour is learned through association, rather than prevented or controlled
32
Classical conditioning
An automatic conditioned response to a conditioned stimulus is learned after the stimulus is repeatedly paired with an unconditioned response
33
Classical conditioning in relation to crime
Sexual arousal and nonconsensual sex After pornography and sexual arousal are associated
34
Aversive conditioning in relation to crime
Offender is exposed to an unpleasant stimulus while sexually aroused in response to deviant source
35
Covert aversive conditioning
Offender pairs imagined aversive consequence with deviant fantasies or behaviour
36
Example of covert aversive conditioning
Offender listens to a story that contains: Their preferred deviant stimulus (e.g., nonconsensual sex) with buildup of sexual arousal An aversive consequence that causes intense disgust, pain, or humiliation (e.g., vomiting, getting caught) (i.e., offender learns to associate the deviant stimulus with the aversive consequence) Release from the aversive consequence by removing the activity (e.g., while encouraging relaxation) (i.e., offender learns to associate avoidance of deviant activity with feelings of relief)
37
Overt aversive conditioning
Offender pairs actual aversive consequence with or immediately after the deviant stimulus
38
Example of overt aversive conditioning
Electric shock or foul odour is paired with scenes depicting nonconsensual sex
39
What is overt aversive conditioning usually followed by?
Arousal reconditioning to strengthen appropriate arousal (e.g., consensual sex)
40
Operant conditioning
Voluntary behaviour as determined largely be environmental consequences
41
How is operant conditioning crucial for criminal justice intervention (4 items)?
Positive reinforcement Negative reinforcement Positive punishment Negative punishment
42
Positive reinforcement
Introduction of pleasant stimulus increases frequency of behaviour
43
Negative reinforcement
Removal of aversive stimulus increases frequency of behaviour
44
Positive punishment
Introduction of unpleasant stimulus decreases frequency of behaviour
45
Negative punishment
Removal of pleasant stimulus decreases frequency of behaviour
46
Generally, is reinforcement or punishment better for criminal justice intercention?
Reinforcement
47
Name 3 factors that effectiveness of operant conditioning depends on
Immediacy Consistency Intensity
48
Immediacy
How soon the consequence occurs Delayed reinforcement or punishment often targets the wrong behaviour
49
Immediacy example
Committing crime and onset of jail sentence is usually quite delayed
50
Consistency
How frequently the consequence occurs However, intermittent schedules work best for reinforcement
51
Consistency example
When someone commits a crime and gets caught, they usually have committed it many times before
52
Intensity
How strong the consequence is
53
Does punishment tend to be effective or ineffective? Why?
Ineffective, likely because it is often delayed (e.g., long trials in court), inconsistent (e.g., person is only sometimes caught), and lacks intensity (e.g., relatively humane)
54
According to Jeffrey, why does the decision to commit crimes occur? Examples?
Because reinforcing stimuli outweigh aversive stimuli Lack of punishment from parents or legal justice system for stealing Reward for stealing outweighs fear of punishment or occurs in the absence of disapproval
55
Eysenck's biological theory of crime
Crime may be explained by individual differences in nervous system functioning People differ in their ability to learn conditioned emotional responses
56
Give example of application of Eysenck's biological theory of crime
People differ in their responses to parental discipline Scolding (UCS) a child for Stealing a cookie (CS) elicits Discomfort (UCR) such that The child learns to feel discomfort (CR) about stealing
57
Second part of Eysenck's biological theory of crime
Antisocial people show less skin conductance (CR) in response to a tone/noise (CS) after it is repeatedly paired with an electric shock (UCS)
58
What kind of theory is Sutherland's Differential Association Theory?
Social learning theory
59
Give the 9 broad parts to Sutherland's Differential Association Theory
Criminal behaviour is learned Through interacting with others Particularly within intimate personal groups The learning includes: techniques for committing crimes, direction of motives, drives, rationalization, and attitudes (e.g., learning crime is "normal", fun, and/or rewarding Direction of "" is learned from defining unfavourable vs favourable legal codes Excess of definitions are favourable to violating legal codes (e.g., rewards of crime outweigh ideas about values of legal codes) Differential associations vary in frequency, duration, priority, and intensity The learning involves the same mechanisms as any other learning Criminal behaviour is an expression of general needs and values, but particularly how a person has learned to weigh them in response to social context (e.g., offenders learn that criminal behaviour is more valuable than following the legal code, even though it isn't objectively speaking)
60
In Sutherland's Differential Association Theory, how are differential associations affected?
How often a person with a group Length of exposure to definitions How early in life exposure begins Prestige/status of group
61
According to research on the differential association theory, what are two of the most powerful predictors for crime?
Antisocial attitudes and antisocial associates
62
Why is the differential association theory criticized? Examples?
For lack of explanations regarding "definitions" for favourable vs. unfavourable violations of the law Determining frequency, duration, priority, and intensity of definitions is subjective and hard to quantify
63
Examples of criticisms of differential association theory
What makes breaking a certain law "worth it"? E.g., to feed their family, to gain membership into a gang for sense of belonging E.g. what makes a group prestigious/meaningful?
64
Akers' social learning theory
Combines DAT ideas with operant conditioning, as well as observational learning and vicarious conditioning Criminal behaviour is also learned through observing others and vicariously experiencing their consequences
65
Example of Akers' social learning theory
Happiness through observing parents' happiness after stealing
66
According to Akers' social learning theory, what are the most important sources of conditioning?
Parents, peers, and the media (e.g., violent video games)
67
According to Akers' social learning theory, how is crime primarily learned?
Through group interactions, because it's been rewarded (operant conditioning) relative to alternative behaviours And through observing how significant groups define behaviour as "bad" or "good"
68
What does PIC-R model stand for?
Personal, interpersonal, and community reinforcement model
69
What kind of framework is the PIC-R model? What kind of perspectives is it influenced by?
Personality and social psychological framework Influenced by behavioural and cognitive social learning perspectives
70
What kind of classes of factors are involved in the PIC-R model?
Antecedent factors Consequence factors Sociocultural factors
71
Examples of antecedent factors in the PIC-R model
Learned antisocial attitudes (e.g., through classical and operant conditioning) Encouragement/support from antisocial associates A mental health problem like substance misuse and/or antisocial personality disorder
72
Examples of consequent factors in the PIC-R model
Increased status among peers Experience of arousal for getting away with crime A person with ASPD may be motivated by the arousal they experience when getting away with a crime
73
In the PIC-R model, how do antecedent and consequent factors interact?
They create personal impressions of antisocial vs. prosocial cognitions
74
Explain how the PIC-R model considers sociocultural factors
E.g., SES How they influence impressions of costs vs. rewards for antisocial behaviour
75
Example of how PIC-R model considers sociocultural factors
Someone who grew up in low SES household more likely to learn that stealing is rewarding

Psychology of Crime (9 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions