Quiz 2 Key Terms Flashcards

(49 cards)

1
Q

Civil Commitment

A

the decision a judge makes when a person alleged to be mentally ill should go to a psychiatric hospital

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Parens Patriae

A

State can intervene for wellbeing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Police Power

A

Right to intervene in lives of individuals who break the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Psychiatric Hospital Beds

A

numbers have drastically decreased due to deinstitutionalization and pharmaceuticals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dangerousness Criteria

A

Person must pose a threat to themselves and/or others to be committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Wyatt v. Stickney

A

Right to individual treatment, commitment stripped liberties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Patient Rights

A

Rights to individual treatment, treatment litigation and if free, treatment refusal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Criminalization of Mental Illness

A

Mass incarceration of the mentally ill following deinstitutionalization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Transinstitutionalization

A

refers to movement of mentally ill from mental hospitals to jails and prisons (result of deinstitutionalization)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Competency

A

refers to person’s present ability to understand their situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Insanity

A

Lacking capacity to understand wrongdoing and/or own mental illness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Anosognosia

A

Individual is unaware of their own condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Dusky v. United States

A

Set standard for competency, hallucinating during trial, was oriented but not “present”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Dusky Standard

A

defendant must understand the proceedings (rational and factual) and be able to assist attorney

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Jackson v. Indiana (1973)

A

You can’t hold a person for competency restoration longer than “reasonable” (either commit them or let them go)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Drope v. Missouri (1975)

A

Defense attorney and BOTH judge & prosecution have obligation to raise issue of competence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Godinez v. Morgan (1993)

A

Waiver of rights must be intelligent and voluntary, competency cannot be for “one purpose”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Competency Assessments

A

Used to assess awareness and mental capacity of individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Sell v. United States

A

Competency to stand trial and refuse treatment are NOT the same thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Post-Hinckley Case

A

First examples of expert testimony, burden of proof placed on the prosecution

21
Q

Guilty but Mentally Ill (GBMI)

A

finds defendant guilty but recognizes they have a mental illness and decides if they need treatment

22
Q

Commitment v. Sentence

A

commitment is often longer than the sentence would be, and places individuals in psychiatric facilities

23
Q

Conditional Release

A

shall grant release unless is is clear the person would pose risk of bodily harm or inadequate environment

24
Q

Revocation Factors

A

40% of prison admissions are for parole violation, mostly failure to report on time

25
Insanity Pleas
defendant is unaware of own actions or wrongness of actions due to a mental illness
26
Asylums
Originally created to keep mentally out of the public eye - created for the WEALTHY
27
Psychiatry Origins
Benjamin Rush - father, first to promote disease of the mind and not demon possession
28
Moral Treatment
if patients are treated civilly they will behave civilly, moral insanity (blatant violation of what is "right")
29
Somatic Treatments
All introduced from Europe, received with great optimism
30
Electroshock
high voltage shock treatment, still used in some cases today
31
Lobotomy
severing of frontal lobe, widespread, "preemptive" lobotomies
32
Community Mental Health Centers
Medicare and Medicaid, established in hopes of deinstitutionalization
33
Psychotropic Medication
prescriptions that alter the brain and nervous system to treat mental illness & behavior issues
34
Deinstitutionalization
push to rid the asylums, community mental health centers, criminalization
35
Mental Health Policy Decisions
1981 Reagan cut federal mental health funding by 30%
36
Lessard v. Schmidt
WI established requirement for evidence, requirement for proof for need of commitment beyond reasonable
37
O'Connor v. Donaldson
Ruled person must be dangerous to be confined
38
Lake v. Cameron
court required spectrum of services to be considered, including outpatient
39
Ipsi Dixit
he himself said it (Latin) Expert: because I said so
40
Fact Witness
can testify to facts ONLY, confined to lived experiences
41
Expert Witness
can give opinion/thoughts on area of expertise
42
Daubert Decision
Laid out guidelines for admitting expert evidence into court
43
Federal Rule 702 Expert Witness Qualifications
The court can qualify someone as an expert witness based on: * Skills * Field * Knowledge * Education *Experience
44
What psych expert convinces a jury most?
An expert who mostly sees patients
45
Mens Rea
Diminished capacity if mens rea is lacking (criminal intent)
46
Legal Positivism
actus rea is the only relevant matter, there is no why or why not
47
Sociological Jurisprudence
Social factors matter, mens rea matters, depends on social factors
48
Frye Decision
expert evidence must be limited to methods that are "generally accepted" in the field in question
49
Kuhmo Tire Decision
Judges get to decide what expert testimony gets admitted as evidence