Reading 13 Managing Institutional Investor Portfolios Flashcards
(88 cards)
Institutional investors
Institutional investors are corporations or other legal entities that ultimately serve as financial intermediaries between individuals and investment markets.
Pension fund, plan sponsor (definitions)
Pension funds contain assets that are set aside to support a promise of retirement income. Generally, that promise is made by some enterprise or organization—such as a business, labor union, municipal or state government, or not-for-profit organization—that sets up the pension plan. This organization is referred to as the plan sponsor.
Cash balance plan
A cash balance plan is a defined-benefit plan whose benefits are displayed in individual recordkeeping accounts. These accounts show the participant the current value of his or her accrued benefit and facilitate portability to a new plan.
General characteristics of DB plan
All DB plans share one common characteristic: They are promises made by a plan sponsor that generate a future financial obligation or “pension liability.”
The sponsor’s promise for DB plans is made for the retirement stage—what the employee will be able to withdraw. In contrast, the promise for DC plans is made for the current stage—what the plan sponsor will contribute on behalf of the employee.
General characteristics of DC plan
DC plans encompass arrangements that are
- pension plans, in which the contribution is promised and not the benefit
- profit-sharing plans, in which contributions are based, at least in part, on the plan sponsor’s profits.
The common elements of all these plans are:
- a contribution is made into an account for each individual participant,
- those funds are invested over time,
- the plans are tax-deferred
- upon withdrawal from the plan or reaching retirement, the participants receive the value of the account in either a lump sum or a series of payments.
The key differences between DC and DB plans
The key differences between DC and DB plans are as follows:
- For DC plans, because the benefit is not promised, the plan sponsor recognizes no financial liability, in contrast to DB plans.
- DC plan participants bear the risk of investing (i.e., the potential for poor investment results). In contrast, in DB plans the plan sponsor bears this risk (at least in part) because of the sponsor’s obligation to pay specified future pension benefits. DB plan participants bear early termination risk: the risk that the DB plan is terminated by the plan sponsor.
- Because DC plan contributions are made for individual participants’ benefit, the paid-in contributions and the investment returns they generate legally belong to the DC plan participant.
- Because the records are kept on an individual-account basis, DC plan participants’ retirement assets are more readily portable—that is, subject to certain rules, vesting schedules, and possible tax penalties and payments, a participant can move his or her share of plan assets to a new plan.
From an investment standpoint, DC plans fall into two types
From an investment standpoint, DC plans fall into two types:
- Sponsor directed, whereby much like a DB plan, the sponsor organization chooses the investments. For example, some profit-sharing plans (retirement plans in which contributions are made solely by the employer) are sponsor directed.
- Participant directed, whereby the sponsor provides a menu of diversified investment options and the participants determine their own personalized investment policy. Most DC plans are participant directed.
Three basic liability concepts exist for pension plans
Three basic liability concepts exist for pension plans:
- Accumulated benefit obligation (ABO).
- Projected benefit obligation (PBO).
- Total future liability.
An actuary’s work will also determine the split of the plan liability between retired and active lives (employees). This distinction will indicate two important factors:
- Because retirees are currently receiving benefits, the greater the number of retired lives, the greater the cash flows out of the fund each month, and thus the higher the pension fund’s liquidity requirement. The portion of a pension fund’s liabilities associated with retired workers is the retired-lives part; that associated with active workers is the active-lives part.
- Because the same mortality table is being applied to both active and retired plan beneficiaries, a plan with a greater percentage of retirees generally has a shorter average life or duration of future pension liabilities.
Accumulated benefit obligation (ABO)
Accumulated benefit obligation (ABO). The ABO is effectively the present value of pension benefits, assuming the plan terminated immediately such that it had to provide retirement income to all beneficiaries for their years of service up to that date (accumulated service). The ABO excludes the impact of expected future wage and salary increases.
Projected benefit obligation (PBO)
Projected benefit obligation (PBO). The PBO stops the accumulated service in the same manner as the ABO but projects future compensation increases if the benefits are defined as being tied to a quantity such as final average pay. The PBO thus includes the impact of expected compensation increases and is a reasonable measure of the pension liability for a going concern that does not anticipate terminating its DB plan. Funding status is usually computed with respect to the PBO.
Total future liability
Total future liability. This is the most comprehensive, but most uncertain, measure of pension plan liability. Total future liability can be defined as the present value of accumulated and projected future service benefits, including the effects of projected future compensation increases. This financial concept can be executed internally as a basis for setting investment policy.
Factors Affecting Risk Tolerance and Risk Objectives of DB Plans
1. Plan status
- Variable: Plan funded status (surplus or deficit)
- Explanation: Higher pension surplus or higher funded status implies greater risk tolerance.
2. Sponsor financial status and profitability
- Variable: Debt to total assets, current and expected profitability
- Explanation: Lower debt ratios and higher current and expected profitability imply greater risk tolerance.
3. Sponsor and pension fund common risk exposures
- Variable: Correlation of sponsor operating results with pension asset returns
- Explanation: The lower the correlation, the greater risk tolerance, all else equal.
4. Plan features
- Variable: Provision for early retirement, Provision for lump-sum distributions
- Explanation: Such options tend to reduce the duration of plan liabilities, implying lower risk tolerance, all else equal.
5. Workforce characteristics
- Variable: Age of workforce, active lives relative to retired lives
- Explanation: The younger the workforce and the greater the proportion of active lives, the greater the duration of plan liabilities and the greater the risk tolerance.
Asset/liability management
Asset/liability management is a subset of a company’s overall risk management practice that typically focuses on financial risks created by the interaction of assets and liabilities; for given financial liabilities, asset/liability management involves managing the investment of assets to control relative asset/liability values
Risk objectives of DB
- DB plans may state a risk objective relative to the level of pension surplus volatility (i.e., standard deviation).
- Another kind of ALM risk objective relates to shortfall risk with respect to plan liabilities. Shortfall risk may relate to achieving:
- a funded status of 100 percent (or some other level) with respect to the ABO, PBO, or total future liability;
- a funded status above some level that will avoid reporting a pension liability on the balance sheet under accounting rules; and
- a funded status above some regulatory threshold level.
- Other goals that may influence risk objectives include two that address future pension contributions:
- Minimize the year-to-year volatility of future contribution payments.
- Minimize the probability of making future contributions, if the sponsor is currently not making any contributions because the plan is overfunded.
- In addition to risk objectives relative to liabilities and contributions, sponsors may state absolute risk objectives, as with any other type of investing.
Shortfall risk
Shortfall risk is the risk that portfolio value will fall below some minimum acceptable level over some time horizon; it can be stated as a probability.
Return Objectives for DB plan
A DB pension plan’s broad return objective is to achieve returns that adequately fund its pension liabilities on an inflation-adjusted basis.
For a DB pension plan, the return requirement (in the sense of the return the plan needs to achieve on average) depends on a number of factors, including the current funded status of the plan and pension contributions in relation to the accrual of pension benefits.
For a fully funded pension plan, the portfolio manager should determine the return requirement beginning with the discount rate used to calculate the present value of plan liabilities.
Why the pension fund’s stated return desire may be higher than its return requirement?
The pension fund’s stated return desire may be higher than its return requirement, in some cases reflecting concerns about future pension contributions or pension income:
- Return objectives relating to future pension contributions. The natural ambitious or “stretch target” of any DB plan sponsor is to make future pension contributions equal zero. A more realistic objective for most is to minimize the amount of future pension contributions, expressed either on an undiscounted or discounted basis.
- Return objectives related to pension income. Both US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Accounting Standards (IAS) incorporate accounting rules that address the recognition of pension expense in the corporate plan sponsor’s income statement. The rules are symmetrical—that is, a well-funded plan can be in a position of generating negative pension expense, i.e. pension income. In periods of strong financial market performance, a substantial number of corporations will have pension income that is a measurable portion of total net income reported on the corporate plan sponsor’s income statement. A sponsor in this position may have an objective of maintaining or increasing pension income.
It is worth noting that pension plan sponsors may manage investments for the active-lives portion of pension liabilities according to risk and return objectives that are distinct from those they specify for the retired-lives portion.
Liquidity Requirement of DB plan
The net cash outflow (benefit payments minus pension contributions) constitutes the pension’s plan liquidity requirement.
The following issues affect DB plans’ liquidity requirement:
- The greater the number of retired lives, the greater the liquidity requirement, all else equal. As one example, a company operating in a declining industry may have a growing retired-lives portion placing increasing liquidity requirements on the plan.
- The smaller the corporate contributions in relation to benefit disbursements, the greater the liquidity requirement. The need to make contributions depends on the funded status of the plan. For plan sponsors that need to make regular contributions, young, growing workforces generally mean smaller liquidity requirements than older, declining workforces.
- Plan features such as the option to take early retirement and/or the option of retirees to take lump-sum payments create potentially higher liquidity needs.
Time Horizon for DB plan
The investment time horizon for a DB plan depends on the following factors:
- whether the plan is a going concern or plan termination is expected; and
- the age of the workforce and the proportion of active lives. When the workforce is young and active lives predominate, and when the DB plan is open to new entrants, the plan’s time horizon is longer.
The horizon can also be multistage: for the active-lives portion the time horizon is the average time to the normal retirement age, while for the retired-lives portion, it is a function of the average life expectancy of retired plan beneficiaries.
Tax Concerns for DB plan
Investment income and realized capital gains within private defined-benefit pension plans are usually exempt from taxation.
Legal and Regulatory Factors of DB plan
All retirement plans are governed by laws and regulations that affect investment policy. Virtually every country that allows or provides for separate portfolio funding of pension schemes imposes some sort of regulatory framework on the fund or plan structure.
A pension plan trustee is an example of a fiduciary, a person standing in a special relation of trust and responsibility with respect to other parties.
Unique Circumstances for DB plan
- Investment in alternative investments (for example, private equity, hedge funds, and natural resources) often requires complex due diligence. Due diligence refers to investigation and analysis in support of an investment action or recommendation; failure to exercise due diligence may sometimes result in liability according to various laws.
- Another unique circumstance for a plan might be a self-imposed constraint against investing in certain industries viewed as having negative ethical or welfare connotations, or in shares of companies operating in countries with regimes against which some ethical objection has been raised.
Corporate Risk Management and the Investment of DB Pension Assets
A DB pension plan can potentially so significantly affect the sponsoring corporation’s financial performance that the study of DB pension asset investment in relation to pension and corporate objectives has developed into a wide-ranging literature.
Practically, we can make several observations. From a risk management perspective, the two important concerns are:
- managing pension investments in relation to operating investments; and
- coordinating pension investments with pension liabilities.
The principal investment issues for DC plans
The principal investment issues for DC plans are as follows:
- Diversification. The sponsor must offer a menu of investment options that allows participants to construct suitable portfolios.
- Company Stock. Holdings of sponsor-company stock should be limited to allow participants’ wealth to be adequately diversified.
Participants in DC plans bear the risk of investment results. As a consequence, an investment policy statement for a DC plan fulfills a much different role than an investment policy statement for a DB plan.