Reading Part 2 Flashcards
(164 cards)
What is the one lesson that the author has learned from his research into marital relationships?
That a lasting marriage results from a couple’s ability to resolve conflicts that are inevitable in any relationship
Which factors does John Gottman look at to classify a marriage?
Frequency of fights, the facial expressions and physiological responses of both partners during their confrontations, what they say to each other, and in what tone of voice they interact verbally.
What are the three different styles of problem solving into which healthy marriages tend to settle?
[1] Validating: couples compromise often and calmly work out their
problems to mutual satisfaction as they arise; [2] volatile: conflict erupts often, resulting in
passionate disputes; [3] conflict avoiding: couples agree to disagree, rarely confronting their
differences head-on.
According to the author, which of the three styles is best for a marriage’s future?
His research suggests all three are equally stable and bode equally well for the marriage’s future.
What descriptor does Gottman use for “validator” couples?
In the midst of disagreement they still let their partners know that they consider his/her emotions valid, even if they don’t agree with them.
What descriptors does Gottman use for “volatile” couples?
These couples see themselves as equals. They are independent sorts who believe that marriage should emphasize and strengthen their individuality. They are open with each other about their feelings—both positive and negative. These marriages tend to be passionate and exciting.
What descriptors does Gottman use for “conflict-avoiding” couples?
Not much seems to happen in this type of marriage. They make light of their differences rather than resolving them. This type of couple flies in the face of conventional wisdom that links marital stability to skillfully talking
things out.
What appears to be the key dynamic in what amounts to the emotional ecology of every
marriage?
The balance between negativity and positivity
What really separates contented couples from those in deep marital misery?
A healthy balance between their positive and negative feelings and actions toward each other.
What is the “magic ratio” of positive to negative that likely results in a stable marriage over time?
5 to 1—five times as much positive feeling and interaction as there is negative.
How do unhappy marriages resemble each other?
They follow the same, specific downward spiral before coming to a sad end.
What are the four cascades or “Four Horsemen” a couple hit as they tumble down the marital
rapids?
[1] Criticism,
[2] contempt,
[3] defensiveness, and
[4] stonewalling.
What does criticism involve?
Attacking someone’s personality or character rather than a specific behavior, usually with blame
What are the two common types of criticisms mentioned in the article?
[1] “Kitchen sinking” and
[2] accusing your partner of betraying you, of being untrustworthy
What is a telltale sign that you’ve slipped from complaining to criticizing?
Using global phrases like “you never” or “you always”
What separates contempt from criticism?
The intention to insult and psychologically abuse your
partner.
What are some common signs of expressing contempt?
Insults and name calling, hostile humor, mockery, and body language [sneering, rolling eyes, curling your upper lip]
What are the signs of defensiveness?
Denying responsibility, making excuses, disagreeing with negative mind-reading, cross-complaining, and repeating yourself.
What is the first step toward breaking out of defensiveness?
To no longer see your partner’s words as an attack but as information that is being strongly expressed.
What does stonewalling convey?
Disapproval, icy distance, and smugness.
Are the “four horsemen” the end of the line? Why or why not?
They are not. It is only after they turn a relationship sour that the ultimate danger arises and only if your inner thoughts go unchallenged are you likely to topple down the final marital cascade. If you learn to recognize
what is happening to your marriage, you can still develop the tools you need to regain control of
it.
What three characteristics of sibling relationships stand out among the findings of systematic
research?
[1] Sibling relationships are—from infancy through adolescence—notable for their emotional power and for the uninhibited expression of these emotions,
[2] Intimacy—most children spend more time in interaction with siblings than with parents; therefore, this intimacy can be a source of great support or conflict.
[3] There is a great range of individual differences,
evident from early infancy through to adolescence.)
Why should some siblings get along so well and be important sources of support and comfort for
one another, while others are so hostile?
(In addition to the family constellation variables, the
personality characteristics of individual children, the quality of relationships within the family, and
the social adversities or risks faced by the family all play an important role in individual differences in sibling relationships.)
What are personality and temperamental characteristics more clearly related to? Why?
They are more clearly related to conflict in the sibling relationship rather than in the positive aspects of the
relationship possibly due to problems of measuring the positive features, which tend to be less evident when parents are present, whereas conflict between siblings is all too evident.