Real Property Flashcards

(33 cards)

1
Q

Easement

A

An easement is a nonpossessory interest in land that gives the holder a specific, limited right to make use of that land.

Easements may be express or implied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Express Easement

A

An express Easement is subject to the statue of frauds (must be in writing). It can be created by grant or reservation, e.g., when a grantor conveys land but reserves an easement right in land for the grantor’s use/benefit

Express Easements are always subject to recording statutes.

Negative Easements must be express.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Implied Easement Types

A

There are four types of implied easement - prescription, implication (prior use), necessity, and estoppel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dominant Estate

A

The dominant estate is the land benefited by the easement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Servient Estate

A

The servient estate is the land burdened by easement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Easement Appurtenant

A

An easement appurtenant is tied to the use of the land. It is fully transferable and goes with the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Easement In Gross

A

An easement in gross benefits the holder personally. There is no dominant estate in such an easement.

While these were traditionally not transferrable, today if there is intent for it to be transferable upon creation, it will be.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Easement Types Generally

A

Easements may be

1) Express or Implied

2) Appurtenant or In Gross

3) Affirmative or Negative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Implied Easements generally

A

Implied easements arise out of factual circumstances and are not subject to the statute of frauds. They are also not subject to recording statutes UNLESS a subsequent purchaser had notice of the easement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Easement by Necessity

A

An easement by necessity requires

1) the dominant estate by effectively useless, ie landlocked such that the only way to access the land is by an easement across the servient estate.

2)The dominant and servient estates must have been under common ownership at one time and

3) when the estates were severed, one property became virtually useless without the easement.

Easements by necessity end when no longer necessary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Easement by Implication

A

An easement by implication is created by an ongoing and existing use of the property. It requires common ownership at the time the use began, prior to the estate’s severance the owner must have created a quasi easement, after severance the quasi-easement’s use must be continuous and obvious, and it must be reasonably necessary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Easement by Prescription

A

An easement by prescription is akin to adverse possession.

The dominant estate holder’s use of the easement must be continuous, hostile, actual, open, and for the statutory period.

Continuous means ongoing. Actual means physical presence, open means visible and apparent, hostile means without permission and will be found when all other elements are present, and for the stautory period is self explanatory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Easement by Estoppel

A

An easement by estoppel is created by a representation for permissive use, which the grantee reasonably relies upon in good faith, after which the permission is withdrawn.
If the reliance was detrimental, withdrawal is estoppel, effectively creating an easement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Easement Scope - Express

A

The Scope of an Express easement is that which is written. Where those written terms are ambiguous a court will consider the intent of the og parties as to the purpose of the easement. A change in use is examined for reasonableness, as there is an assumption that the og parties contemplated the easement’s present and future use.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Easement Scope - Implied

A

The scope of an implied easement is determined by the nature of the prior use or necessity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Easement- Duty to maintain

A

While the owner of the easement typically has the duty to maintain it, parties can contract otherwise

17
Q

Easement Termination

A
  1. Abandonment
  2. Destruction of Servient Estate
  3. Estoppel
  4. Expiration
  5. End of Necessity
  6. Merger
  7. Prescription
  8. Release
  9. Severance
18
Q

Profit a Prendre

A

A Profit a Prendre is not an easement. It is a right to enter another’s land and remove a specific natural resource.

It operates similar to an easement, but cannot be created by necessity

19
Q

License

A

A license is not an easement. A license is a revocable permission to use another’s land.

Unlike easements, licenses do not bind successors, only the holder.

20
Q

Real Covenant

A

A real covenant is a promise concerning the use of land that runs to successors to the promise.

A real covenant must be in writing, the parties must have intended the rights and duties to run with the land (heirs, assignes, successors language), it must touch and concern the land, there must have been notice, and privity.

For the burden to run, strict vertical privity is required (which means that the successors must take the same estate as the og party), while only limited vertical privity is required for the benefit.

The remedy is damages

21
Q

Equitable Servitude

A

An equitable servitude is a nonpossessory property right. Equitable servitudes are covenants about land use that are enforced at equity by injunction.

For a servitude to be enforced at equity, it must be in writing and meet the following requirements: (i) there must be intent for the restriction to be enforceable by and against successors in interest, (ii) the servitude must touch and concern the land, and (iii) if the person against whom the servitude is to be enforced is a purchaser, he must have notice (whether actual, record, or inquiry notice) of the servitude.

The remedy is injunctive relief

22
Q

Implied Reciprocal Servitude

A

Type of Equitable Servitude which is 1) implied and 2) need not be in writing.

Allows owners in a subdivision to enforce restrictions on an unrestricted lot owner

Requirements:

When sales began, developer had a common scheme for subdivision; and
Owner of unrestricted lot had notice (actual, record, or inquiry) of the restriction

23
Q

Differentiate Easements, Real Covenants, and Equitable Servitudes

A

Easements are about USE, while covenants/servitudes are about PROMISES. When in doubt on the bar, if they want money, think real covenant; if they want to stop something, think equitable servitude or easement.

24
Q

Terminating a Real Covenant

A

1) Release
2) Merger
3) Condemnation

25
Terminating an Equitable Servitude
Same as Easement: 1. Abandonment 2. Destruction of Servient Estate 3. Estoppel 4. Expiration 5. End of Necessity 6. Merger 7. Prescription 8. Release 9. Severance
26
Fixtures
Fixtures are tangible personal property attached to real property in a manner that is treated as real property. The general rule is that, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, ownership of a fixture attached to real property passes to the buyer of the related real property. Fee simple property owners are free to make improvements, including fixtures, while life estate or tenants are limited.
27
Fixture Removal
Owner of real property is generally entitled to the chattel, unless seller reserves in k right to keep chattel Life tenant/tenant--Presumption is that they can remove fixtures unless doing so would permanently damage property. Trespassers: Old rule: Trespassers can never remove any fixture/improvement they install New Rule: Trespassers can remove an improvement, or at least recover value added to property, so long as they acted in good faith
28
Zoning - Prior nonconforming Uses
A prior nonconforming use may be grandfathered into the zoning scheme such that it is allowed to continue in place. A nonconforming use may generally not be expanded or changed to a different nonconforming use though may continue through successors. Conduct by a business owner that leads to more consumers typically does not constitute an enlargement when the conduct does not involve a physical expansion of the property or the buildings on the property. Acts such as increasing the number of days that the business is open, or modernizing equipment involved in the nonconforming use, usually is not sufficient to constitute an enlargement of the nonconforming use.
28
Zoning
Zoning is governmental land use regulation for the protection and safety of the community by segregating incompatible uses from being developed in the same area. It arises from state police powers and on the local government level, enabling acts.
29
Zoning--Post ordinance nonconforming uses
Variances. Use Variance allows one to obtain the right o use property in a manner not permitted by the zoning. Area variance focuses on restrictions concerning property development. A person applying for a variance must show: 1) Compliance would create unnecessary hardship 2) The hardship arises from circumstances unique to the property 3) Owner did not create the hardship 4) Variance is in keeping w/ overall purpose of ordinance 5) Variance will not cause substantial harm to general welfare
30
Nuisance generally
Unreasonable interference with use and enjoyment of land Remedies are usually damages, but if money damages are inadequate or unavailable, injunctive relief may be provided.
31
Private Nuisance
Substantial and unreasonable interference w/ another individual’s use or enjoyment of his property Substantial--One that would be offensive, inconvenient or annoying to an average person in community Unreasonable--Injury outweighs usefulness of d’s actions
32
Public Nuisance
Unreasonable interference with health, safety, or property rights of community Private party--Must show that they suffer a different kind of harm than rest of community