Torts Flashcards

(51 cards)

1
Q

What are the elements of Negligence?

A

In a negligence action, the P must show that the D:
1) owed a duty to the plaintiff
2) breached that duty
3) actually caused the P’s injuries
4) Proximately caused the P’s injuries
5) that damages exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is duty?

A

Duty is a legal obligation to act in a certain way. The analysis goes: Is there a duty or not? If yes, what is the nature of that duty aka standard of care?

Typically the standard is reasonable care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

To Whom is the duty owed and what is that duty generally?

A

A duty of care is generally owed to all who may foreseeably be injured by the D’s conduct, where a foreseeable plaintiff is one within the zone of foreseeable harm. The standard of care under that duty is generally to act as a reasonably prudent person under the circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Is there a duty to act affirmatively?

A

There is generally no duty to act affirmatively/help, unless:

1) you assume the duty by undertaking to rescue another. Your duty is thus a duty of reasonable care in the performance of that rescue.

2) you place the P in harm’s way

3) a person with ability and actual authority to control another has a duty to exercise reasonable control

4) if you have a special relationship to the P (ala innkeeper guest)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the Majority (Cardozo) Scope of Duty

A

A duty is owed to foreseeable P’s where foreseeable P’s are members of the class of persons who might be foreseeably harmed by the D’s conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the Minority (Andrews) Scope of Duty

A

A duty is owed to foreseeable P’s, such that any time the D’s conduct could harm someone, there is a duty to everyone and whether this particular P was foreseeable is a proximate cause issue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Is there a duty to unforeseeable Ps?

A

Nope

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the Standard of Care when a duty is owed?

A

The General standard of care is that of a reasonably prudent person under the circumstances.

This is an objective standard.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the standard of care for a D with special mental/emotional characteristics?

A

-Reasonably prudent person under the circumstances

D’s with special mental/emotional characteristics are subject to the same standard as everyone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the standard of care for a D with special physical characteristics?

A

Particular physical characteristics are taken into acct.

D is compared w/ reasonably prudent person w/ like characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Does intoxication effect the standard of care?

A

No, unless it was involuntary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the standard of care for children?

A

Children are compared to reasonable children of similar age, intelligence, exp.

Unless engaged in high risk adult activity (driving) – held to the reasonably prudent person standard then.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the standard of care for common carriers and innkeepers?

A

Traditionally, both were held to the highest duty of care consistent w/ practical operation of business.

Now, common carriers are still held to this standard, but innkeepers just responsible for ordinary negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the standard of care for auto drivers

A

Drivers were traditionally liable for g ross negligence and wanton or willful misconduct

Now most jurisdictions apply general duty of reasonable care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the standard of care for bailors and bailees

A

Bailor must warn a gratuitous bailee of known dangerous conditions
–If bailor receives sole benefit then bailee has lesser duty
–If bailee receives a benefit, then he has a higher duty of care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is an invitee

A

Invitees are those on land for a material or economic purpose. They include business visitors–someone invited to confer an economic benefit on land possessor–and public invitees–somone invited on land that is open to the public

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What duties generally do possessors of land owe?

A

Possessors of land owe variable duties to those on their land, depending on the status of the plaintiff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What duty does a land possessor owe an invitee?

A

Property owner has a non-delegable duty to:

  1. Inspect area where invitees have access;
  2. For non-obvious, unknown dangers;
  3. Warn the invitee of the dangers; and
  4. Take reasonable steps to protect them from the dangers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is a Licensee

A

Person who enters onto D’s land with D’s express or implied permission (e.g. friends, social guests, emergency personnel)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What duty does a land possessor owe a licensee?

A

Property owner must:

  1. Exercise reasonable care on the property;
  2. Warn or correct concealed dangers;
  3. That are known or should be known;
  4. In areas where P has access as a licensee

⚠️ Note: No duty to inspect for dangers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What duty does a landlord owe its tenants?

A
  1. Reasonably inspect and keep safe all common areas; and
  2. Warn tenants of hidden dangers
22
Q

What duty is owed to discovered or foreseeable tresspassers?

A

Property owner must correct or warn of dangerous, artificial conditions on land that could cause death or serious bodily harm

⚠️ There is no duty to warn about natural conditions

23
Q

What duty is owed to undiscovered trespassers

A

Refrain from wanton, willful, reckless misconduct

24
Q

What is the attractive nuisance doctrine

A

Under the “attractive nuisance” doctrine, a land possessor may be liable for injuries to children trespassing on the land if the children, because of their youth, do not discover or cannot appreciate the danger presented by a dangerous artificial condition where the owner has reason to know children are likely to trespass.

Mitigating elements include
1) the utility of the condition compared to the risk of injury
2) And the Possessor’s exercise of reasonable care.

25
Land possessor's liability for victims off their land
Generally land possessor is not liable for injuries resulting from natural condition Artificial conditions--Must prevent unreasonable risk of harm to persons not on premises
26
What is breach?
A violation of the standard of care owed to another is a breach of duty. Generally, when the burden of precaution is outweighed by the probability of harm and the severity of loss, there is a breach of duty. Professionals however have a higher duty--that of the same skill, knowledge, and care as an ordinary professional in the same community.
27
What is negligence per se
A plaintiff may also prove a defendant breached their duty if the elements of negligence per se are satisfied: (a) the defendant violated a statute or regulation, (b) the plaintiff belongs to a class of people that the statute or regulation was intended to protect, and (c) the defendant’s violation of the law caused the type of harm that the statute or regulation was intended to prevent. Once negligence per se is established, in order for the defendant to be liable, the plaintiff must prove that his injuries were actually and proximately caused by the defendant's violation of the statute.
28
What are defenses to a negligence per se action
EXCUSE for violating: D may show that comply w/ statute wld be even more dangerous than violating it. Compliance was impossible or emergency justified violation Incapacity (phys. Disability ) Exercised reasonable care in trying to comply Statutory Vagueness
29
What standard of care do non-physician professionals owe?
Professionals owe an elevated standard of care--they are expected to exhibit the same skill, knowledge, and care as an ordinary practitioner in the same community. Evidence of custom is admissible to establish the standard of care, and while not dispositive for laypeople, is dispositive for professionals.
30
What standard of care do physicians owe?
Physicians were once expected to exhibit the same skill, knowledge, and care as one in the same/similar community, but that community is now national under the modern view. Physicians must explain all material risks of a medical procedure to a patient in advance of a patient's decision to consent to treatment. Failure to secure informed consent constitutes a breach of the physician's. Doctors are not under an obligation to disclose when the risk is a commonly known risk, the patient waives or refuses the information, the patient is incompetent, or disclosure would be detrimental to the patient.
31
Define Res Ipsa Loquitur
Under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, negligence may be inferred if (1) the injury is the type that ordinarily would not occur without negligence, (2) the instrumentality causing the injury was within the exclusive control of the defendant, and (3) the plaintiff was not responsible for his injury.
32
What is actual cause
Actual cause is the factual cause of P's injuries. Generally the but for test is used, but in certain circumstances the substantial factor or burden shifting tests are used.
33
What is the but for test
P must show that the injury would not have occurred but the D's negligence.
34
What is the substantial factor test and when is it used?
Under the substantial factor test, actual cause exists when D's tortious conduct was a substantial factor in causing harm. Used when there are multiple causes or tortfeasers that could have caused P's harm.
35
What is the burden shifting test and when is it used?
If one or more D's simultaneously engaged in negligent conduct that could have caused P's injuries, the court will ask each D to prove their actions were not the actual cause of P's injuries. If D cannot prove that the other D was responsible for the injury, both will be held jointly & severally liable.
36
What is proximate cause?
Proximate causation means that the plaintiff suffered a foreseeable harm that is not too remote and was within the scope of liability of the Defendant's conduct. Proximate cause exists when the D's actions are a direct cause of the P's injuries or if an intervening force occurs btwn the D's act and the P's injry, the d still may be liable if the intervening force was foreseeable.
37
Define intervening cause
Event that happens after D's conduct that contributes to P's injuries (e.g. medical malpractice). Can be either foreseeable or unforeseeable. If unforeseeable, D is relieved of liability.
38
Define superseding cause
Unforeseeable, freakish, or bizarre intervening event that breaks the chain of causation between the initial wrongful act and the ultimate injury. Negates proximate cause, thereby relieving D of any liability.
39
What type of damages/harm must a P prove to recover in negligence?
Actual damage (harm to person/property). Nominal damages and damages for solely economic harm are not sufficient
40
To what extent is a D liable for foreseeable injuries?
D is liable for the full extent of p’s foreseeable injuries, even if extent is unusual or unforeseeable.
41
What are the defenses to negligence?
1. Contributory Negligence 2. Comparative Fault 3. Assumption of Risk.
42
Define contributory negligence
P's conduct fell below the relevant standard of care and contributed to P's injury. Traditionally contributory negligence is a complete bar to recovery.
43
Explain the Last Clear Chance Doctrine
P can defend contributory negligence claim by alleging that D had last clear chance to avoid injuring P, but failed to do so
44
Define Comparative Fault
Apportions fault between P and D and reduces P's damages proportionally. Two types: Pure comparative negligence Modified comparative negligence
45
Define Pure Comparative Fault
Reduces P's recovery in proportion to P's fault E.g. If P is 40% at fault, recovery will be reduced by 40%
46
Define Modified Comparative Fault
P cannot be more than 50% at fault for the resulting injury or else recovery will be barred. If P is less than 50% at fault, recovery is reduced by percentage P was at fault (same as pure comparative negligence)
47
What is Assumption of the Risk
Assumption of the Risk applies when a party knowingly and willingly embraces a risk for their own purpose. Can be express or implied
48
Express assumption of the risk requires a court to ask what?
Cts will ask 2 questions 1. Is waiver clear such that P understood 2. Is waiver enforceable Waivers are unlikely to be enforced where Waiver disclaims liability for reckless or wanton misconduct There is a gross disparity of bargaining power btwn parties Party seeking to enforce the provision offers services of great importance to the public Provision subject to K defenses Enforcement wld be against public policy
49
What is implied assumption of the risk?
Unreasonably proceeding in the face of known, specific risk and occurs when P voluntarily encounters a known, specific risk
50
What are the elements for NIED
1. D's negligence created foreseeable risk of harm to P; 2. P was in the zone of danger; and 3. P suffered emotional distress as a result
51
What are the elements for bystander NIED?
1. P is closely related to V; 2. P was present at the scene of the injury; 3. P witnessed or perceived the injury causing event; and 4. P suffered severe emotional distress as a result