Recovered and False Memories Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q

What are the two important issues of Eileen Franklin’s case?

A

Eileen’s memories were recovered in the context of therapy.
All of the details that Eileen recalled had been publicised.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who proposed the notion of depression?

A

Sigmund Freud

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did sigmund Freud thought?

A

-Traumatic events banished from conscious recall until such time as we
are able to cope with them
-Emotion seeps into everyday life(anxiety and depression remain)
-When recovered, the memory is in pristine condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did people to unearth their memories?

A

lots of therapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the lists of symptom?

A
  • Depressive symptoms
  • Feeling anxious
  • Being scared or having phobias
  • Sexual difficulties
  • Sense of failure or helplessness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does bias that the therapist make when working with repression, that leads to dangerous therapy?

A
  1. A priori assumptions regarding abuse
  2. Confirmation biases and specific hypothesis testing
  3. Plausibility-enhancing “evidence”
  4. Adopting and confirming belief in abuse
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are some questionable therapy techniques?

A
  • Guided Imagery
  • Rebirthing(trying to regress people to early stages)
  • Hypnosis(lower the threshold )
  • Age Regression
  • Dream Work
  • Past Life Analysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is memory wars?

A

Therapists (uncovered memories)
Researchers( could lead to false memory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did (Pope & Hudson, 1995) thought when comes to constituting the evidence?

A

Three Pronged evidence approach:
1. That the abuse did take place
2. That it was forgotten and inaccessible for some time
3. That it was later remembered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is retrospective studies?

A
  • Individuals are interviewed today
  • Asked about history of abuse
  • Asked about the memory continuity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a prospective study?

A

following people forward with known evidence
- Individuals with a documented history of abuse
- Interviewed many years later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a case study?

A
  • Individual cases or groups of cases presented alongside
    interpretation of repression from therapist or researcher
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are three main studies looking at the repressed memories?

A

retrospective studies
prospective studies
case study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Williams did in 1994?

A

mainly prospective studies, * Women with documented records of sexual abuse between the ages of
10 months and 12 years
* Interviewed around 17 years later
* 38% did not mention the abuse
* Interpreted as evidence for repression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the problems of Williams study?

A
  • Many of the abusive events occurred during a period characterised by
    childhood amnesia(10 months won’t really remember)
  • Repression is not the only reason that someone wouldn’t report abuse
    in an interview
  • Participants were never directly asked about the documented event
  • Participants reported abusive events outside of the documented event
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the some finding?

A
  • To date, there is no good evidence to support the repression and
    recovery of traumatic memories
  • Evidence does not suggest anything beyond ordinary forgetting and
    remembering
  • Methodological concerns are rife in the existing repressed memory
    literature
17
Q

What is the evidence for false memories?

A

Some recovered memories have been shown to be impossible:
- psychologically
- biologically
- geographically
- factually
These claims still involve a burden of proof
- trauma did not occur
- memory for the trauma exists

18
Q

What are the retractors?

A
  • Hundreds of individuals who recovered memories of abuse eventually
    retracted their allegations
  • Many have sued their therapists
  • Retractors have enabled psychologists to gain insight into the
    processes by which the memories were uncovered( what would the techniques used by the therapist)
  • Retractions seemed primarily based on qualities of the memories
19
Q

What is laboratory research?

A
  • A vast body of research has shown that memories for non-experienced
    events can be relatively easily implanted
20
Q

What is a false paradigm by Loftus & Pickrell (1995)?

A
  • Interviewed about 4 childhood events
  • Three events were true, supplied by family members
  • One was false
  • Three interviews, spaced up to three weeks apart
  • Guided imagery instructions
  • 25% remembered and described the false event
21
Q

What is the recipe of a recovered memory?

A
  • Step 1 – considering the false event to be personally plausible(yeah, this could happen to you, as you have been kids running in the mall and get lost)
  • Step 2 – developing a belief that the memory happened(I did get lost in the mall)
  • Step 3 – constructing a memory (e.g., an image or narrative)
  • Step 4 – making a source monitoring error
22
Q

What is study of plausibility and script knowledge? Pezdek, Finger & Hodge (1997)

A
  • Gave Jewish and Catholic students written narratives of true and false
    events from their childhoods
  • Jewish students were more likely to form a false memory of taking part
    in a Jewish ritual than a Catholic ritual
  • Catholic students show the opposite trend
  • Also measured relative ease of planting a memory for a plausible event
    (being lost in a mall) versus a less plausible event (being given an
    enema)
  • All of the false memories created were for the plausible event
  • Subsequent research has suggested that plausibility can be increased
    experimentally
23
Q

What did Braun, Ellis, & Loftus (2002) about media?

A
  • Participants viewed an ad for
    Disney showing Mickey Mouse
  • Relative to controls, participants’
    confidence that they had shaken
    hands with Mickey Mouse at a
    Disney resort increased
  • Different participants viewed an ad
    for Disney showing Bugs Bunny
  • Relative to controls, participants’
    confidence that they had shaken
    hands with Bugs Bunny at a Disney
    resort increased
24
Q

Why is the Bugs Bunny experiment
more compelling?

A

it is not a Disney character, suggesting a false memory

25
What did Wade et al. (2002)
* Undergraduate participants * Obtained photos from sibling * Doctored 1 photo * Asked participants to recall events in 4 photos over 3 interviews * Over 50% of participants formed a partial or complete memory for the hot air balloon ride
26
What is the problem with this study generalising to actual therapy?
the difference is therapist would not doctor a photo
27
What did Lindsay do in 2004 and finding?
* Half of participants took part in standard false narrative paradigm * Remaining half were given a school photo as an additional cue * 78% of those in the “photo + narrative” condition formed a false memory, compared to 45% in the “narrative only” condition
28
What did Garry did in 1996 and finding?
* Participants rated 40 childhood events on a scale ranging from 1 (definitely didn't happen) to 8 (definitely happened) * 2 weeks later, participants were asked to imagine some of the events occurring * Participants were then asked to complete the rating form again People who have imagined the event, they are more likely to increase the confidence that it had happened to you, also known as imgination inflation
29
How do we know people are actually believe these false memory?
1. They are genuinely surprised when debriefed 2. They are willing to say that they are making something up 3. They were happy to report that they didn’t remember the true events 4. They came up with reasons for not being able to remember
30
What did Rich McNally and Susan Clancy propose?
Alien abduction memories These accounts are strikingly similar – visiting spaceships – intercourse with aliens – medical probes – extraction of sperm/ova One cause is sleep paralysis(occasionally, you awake up before your body moves)
31
What did Clancy carried out DRM paradigm research?
whether people with the alien knowledge more susceptible to the repressed memories, the longer list is more likely to contain the critical allure("sweet") * Those who claimed to have recovered or repressed memories of alien abduction were more prone to falsely recall items from the list. * False recall was related to depressive symptomatology, absorption, magical ideation, and dissociative experiences.
32
what is assocation between DRM and sexual abuse?
People who had the recovered child abuse, developing the DRM
33
What are people find in the Post Traumatic Stress DIsorder in terms of distinct physiological reactions?
- increased heart rate - tension in facial muscles - increased skin conductance
34
How do people with false traumatic memories react when recounting these episodes?
We can't use the physiological reaction to distinguish the true memory from false memory
35
What are the three conclusions of the false memory?
-Research to date does not support the notion that traumatic memories can be repressed and then uncovered at a later date -False memory research provides a far more parsimonious explanation for recovered memories -Unfortunately, at this stage, we cannot tell the difference between real and false memories
36
Why can't we tell the sign of true memory just from physiological change?
60% of abductees showed physiological signs consistent with PTSD