Regional variations Flashcards
Accent
Variation in pronunciation, often associated with a particular geographical region.
Dialect
Variation in words and grammatical structures associated with a particular geographical regio
Convergence
When a speaker adapts their accent to move closer to the accent of the other speaker
Divergence
When a speaker adapts their accent to move away from the accent of the other speaker
What is Covert Prestige?
The less obvious or hidden prestige associated with the use of certain non-standard varieties of a language within particular social groups.
Overt Prestige
The obvious prestige associated with the use of the standard variety of a language within a particular society. Connected to notions of speaking ‘properly’.
Dialect Levelling
The process by which language forms of different parts of the country converge and become more similar over time, with the loss of regional features and reduced diversity of language.
Idiolect
An individual way of speaking with a distinct accent and dialect
Sociolect
Dialect associated with the class of a speaker
Ethnolect
Language associated with ethnic groups
Prosody
Non-verbal aspects of speech like pace, stress, pitch, intonation and volume
‘th’ fronting
Pronounciation of ‘th’ as /f/ or /v/. e.g. ‘think’ becomes ‘fink’ and ‘with’ becomes ‘wiv’.
Register
The term register refers to the various ways people use language based on who they’re talking to and their situation. An example of a register is the formal register, which we would use in formal situations, such as writing essays or talking to a headteacher.
Social variation
People higher up the Sofia; and occupational ladder tend to have fewer regional features than that of people lower down
Identity
created by individual characteristics. It can also be linked to a particular social group where members of the group share common characteristics. A range of factors helps us to create identity and the consensus is that we begin to think about identity in our teenage years.
Language choice contributes to creating identity.
Joanna Thornborrow 2004 on identity ?
“one of the most fundamental ways we have of establishing our identity and shaping other people’s views of who we are, is through our use of language”
This use may include specific lexical choices to help form this identity, grammatical constructions in speech and variations in phonology (or a combination of all three)
Conscious or subconscious use of language for identity is not new in sociolinguistics.
Martha Vineyard study by William Labov ?
- This study identified that islanders subconsciously used diphthong variation to establish their identity as ‘Vineyards’
- This was to maintain social identity and spread an ‘u’and ‘them’ mentality towards visitors / tourists
Gary Ives 2014 Case Studies (Bradford)
Bradford: 95% of students are from Pakistani backgrounds the majority are Mirpuri (in Pakistan), Mirpur is a large city surrounded by villages and farmland, part of Kashmir
—asked why they speak like that: “it’s the way we’re born” “it’s natural”,
—when pushed: “we mix Punjabi and English”, “it’s all about our area”, “there’s different types from different areas”
—distinguished themselves from “freshies” who had just come from Pakistan, offered distinction based on postcode
—used as a secret language to create identity, maybe only used among certain people
Gary Ives 2014 Case Study (London)
- London: students come from a range of ethnic, religious and cultural backgrounds.
—the majority of subjects chose to talk about the words and phrases which they felt “set them apart” from other areas of the country
—often replace standard verb form (chatting to mean talking, getting to mean being), changing nouns to verbs (hype to mean hyping), changing an abstract noun to a less abstract form (madness) - language identity being synonymous without having same background. Not about ethnicity
National dialects and Dialect levelling
-despite language diversity, there is a theory that regional diversity is dying out there. However, there are also new regional dialects such as MLE which challenge dialect levelling
Paul Kerswill on dialect levelling ?
Studied dialect levelling in Hull, Reading and Milton Keynes.
- Found that that the dialects if southern speakers were showing more signs of a loss of marked features whereas the northern speakers were more sheltered from levelling
- may be wanting to maintain identity ir reject southern influence
- increased glottal stops and th fronting, Kerswill believes these are associated with youth culture rather than class
- Hull is an economically deprived northern city in which there may be a desire to reflect social identity with accents
What does Kerswill suggest is the reason for dialect levelling in the south but not the north ?
He suggests an economic factor – the prosperity of southern towns makes social mobility and achievable goal for young people, however, the high levels of unemployment in northern towns such as Hull makes children unconvinced of the value of education as a passport to social mobility and therefore reject the pressure from authoritarian systems such as the educational one to modify their accents.
Labov’s Department Store Study
Studied the procononantal /r/ in New York City. Posed as a customer and asked where a location of a product was twice so he’d hear a more carefully spoken response
Results of the Labov Department Study ?
- showed that the linguistic variable (r) was an indicator of social stratification
- Found that the lower middle class were most susceptible to overt prestige.
- Overall, employees with higher socioeconomic status ( working in higher class stores) pronounced the rhetoric /r/ more frequently than lower socio economic status
- Confirmed that linguistic variation was not random and unstructured but rather the orderly heterogeneity of language