Relations between branches Flashcards
(66 cards)
What is the UK Supreme Court?
- Created in 2009 (Constitutional Reform Act 2005)
- Took over from Law Lords (in House of Lords)
- UK’s highest court of appeal
Supreme Court composition?
- 12 Justices, including a President (currently Lord Reed)
- Appointed by monarch on advice of PM
- Appointments Commission
Legally trained, often previously senior judges
What is judicial neutrality?
- No political bias
- Must base rulings on law, not personal opinion
- Judges avoid public political statements
E.g.: Criticism during Miller 2016 case (“Enemies of the People”)
What is judicial independence?
Judiciary free from interference (esp. from government)
Protected by:
- Security of tenure
- Independent pay
- Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (moved judges out of Parliament)
What is judicial review?
- Courts review decisions of public bodies
- Can overturn unlawful actions
- Upholds the rule of law
What does ultra vires mean?
- A public body acts “beyond its powers”
- Declared unlawful
E.g.: UNISON 2017 – tribunal fees ruled unlawful
How can the Supreme Court influence Parliament and the Executive?
- Judicial review
- Declarations of incompatibility (under
Human Rights Act) - Influential rulings:
- Miller I (2017): Parliament must approve Article 50
- Miller II (2019): Johnson’s prorogation unlawful
Legal vs Political Sovereignty?
- Legal: Who has ultimate law-making authority (→ Parliament)
- Political: Who actually holds power in practice (→ Executive, people, devolved bodies)
Elective dictatorship?
- Coined by Lord Hailsham
- When a government with a majority controls Parliament, it can dominate
E.g.: Blair’s majority = strong control
What are the EU’s four freedoms?
🏃 Free movement of people
📦 Free movement of goods
💶 Free movement of capital
🛠️ Free movement of services
How Parliament holds Executive to account?
(RIPQS):
- Rebellions (Backbench MPs vote against government)
- Inquiries (Select committees like PAC)
- PMQs
- Questions to ministers
Second chamber (House of Lords amendments)
Executive dominance tactics?
-(WAL):
- Whips
- Agenda control (time & bills)
- Legislative majority
Example of Executive being held to account?
- 2013: Parliament voted against Syria airstrikes (Cameron)
- 2019: Johnson’s prorogation ruled unlawful
Has the balance of power shifted?
- Yes: Parliament stronger under minority governments
- No: Still dominated by Executive with large majority
Trend: Power fluctuates with political context
EU Aims? (PEACE)
- Political cooperation
- Economic union
- Access to single market
- Coordinated lawmaking
- Environment of peace
EU’s impact on UK sovereignty?
- EU law > UK law (e.g. Factortame case)
- Limited Parliament’s ability to legislate freely
Brexit’s impact on sovereignty?
- legal sovereignty returned to Parliament
Still constrained by:
- International agreements
- Economic pressures
- Devolved powers
Sovereignty shift trends?
(DRIP):
- Devolution (Scotland/Wales/NI)
- Referendums (public power)
- International law (e.g. treaties)
- Public bodies and courts
Example of devolved sovereignty?
- Scottish Parliament controls education, health, etc.
- 2014 IndyRef showed political power of Scottish people
Do courts hold sovereignty?
- Not legal sovereignty
But do have growing influence through: - Judicial review
- Human Rights Act interpretation
- Striking down executive actions
What was the significance of Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU (2017)?
It forced the government to seek parliamentary approval to trigger Article 50, reinforcing parliamentary sovereignty and limiting executive prerogative powers.
Why was Miller v Prime Minister (2019) important?
The Supreme Court ruled Boris Johnson’s prorogation of Parliament was unlawful, asserting judicial independence and upholding parliamentary accountability.
What did the court decide in UNISON v Lord Chancellor (2017)?
Tribunal fees were ruled unlawful for restricting access to justice, showing how the court can protect rights using judicial review and ultra vires.
What was the impact of Parliament’s vote on Syrian airstrikes in 2013
MPs rejected Cameron’s proposal, showing Parliament can override executive foreign policy decisions, reinforcing scrutiny and accountability.