Research Flashcards

(57 cards)

1
Q

Time when choosing a research method

A

Some methods may take more time because of for example more detailed data being obtained, research methods that take more time may lead to a smaller research sample size.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Money when choosing research method

A

The money available affects the number of researchers, respondents and amounts of research time. Equipment, travel, and people’s time are not cheap

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Access when choosing research method

A

Some groups of respondents and location are easier to access than others. For example, to enter a school to do research, permission is required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ethical issues

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Informed consent

A

Researchers should have the informed consent of their research subjects, because of the effects that the research may have on them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

CONFIDENTIALITY

A

Research subjects have a right to anonymity, so they should not be identifiable when the research is published.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM

A

Some research groups are more vulnerable to psychological harm than others (eg. children)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Theoretical issues

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

RELIABILITY

A

For a research method to be reliable, it must be able to be repeated and obtain similar results. Positivists favour reliable research and therefore use methods such as questionnaires and structured interviews, that can be repeated by any researcher due to the structured conditions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

REPRESENTATIVENESS

A

For a research method to be representative, the sample group must have similar characteristics to those of the wider population. Positivists value representativeness because they wish to discover general patterns and make cause and effect statements about social behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

VALIDITY

A

Validity refers to how true the data is. Interpretivists emphasise the need to use research methods rich in validity, such as unstructured interviews and participant observations because they reveal the real meanings in which people hold.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

EXPERIMENTS

A

An experiment is characterised by its high degree of control that the researcher has over the situation. In an experiment, the researcher identifies and controls all variables that might affect the outcome. By manipulating the variables and observing what happens, the researcher can discover cause and effect relationships. There are two main types of experiments: laboratory experiments and field experiments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS

A

Favoured by positivists, lab experiments test hypothesise in a controlled environment where the researcher changes the independent variable and measures the effect on the dependent variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ADVANTAGES

A

Highly reliable- the original experiment can specify precisely what steps were followed in the original experiments
Can easily identify cause and effect relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

DISADVANTAGES

A

Artificiality - lab experiments are carried out in a highly artificial environment and may not reveal how people act in the real world, any behaviour in these conditions may be artificial.

The Hawthorne effect - a lab is not a formal or natural environment - If people know they are being studied, they may act differently.

Ethical issues - the researcher needs informed consent of the participants - this may be difficult to obtain

Unrepresentative: the small-scale nature of lab experiments reduces their representativeness

It would be impossible to identify and/or control all the variables that might exert an influence on certain social issues (Eg. a child’s education)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Field EXPERIMENTS

A

Field experiments take place in the real social world, whereby the sociologist either creates a situation or adapts a real-life situation to their research purpose. Those involved are usually unaware of the research taking place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

ADVANTAGES

A

Less artificiality - field experiments are set in real-world situations.
Validity - people are unaware of the experimental situation (no Hawthorne effect) and are in their usual social environment, they will act normally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

DISADVANTAGES

A

Ethical issues - involves carrying out an experiment on people without their informed consent

Less control over variables

Limited application - field experiments can only be applied to a limited number of social situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Questionnaires

A

Favoured by positivists, written or self-completed questionnaires are a form of social survey and can be distributed in a range of ways - notably, via post, email or handed out in person. Questionnaires are typically a list of pre-set questions that are closed-end questions with pre-coded answers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

ADVANTAGES

A

Practical - questionnaires are cheap and quick

Quantifiable data

Representative - reach a geographically widespread research sample

Reliable - the questionnaire can be easily repeated due to how the questions are pre-set

Limited ethical issues - the respondent is under no obligation to answer the question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

DISADVANTAGES

A

Response rate - postal questionnaires, in particular, obtain a very low response rate, which may hinder the representativity.

Low validity - People may be more willing to lie.

Unrepresentative - You are likely to get a certain group of people, for example, the unemployed or elderly that answer the questionnaire as many other people might be too busy, and so you won’t get a particularly representative sample.

The interviewer isn’t there to ask follow-up questions and explain questions the participants if they don’t understand

24
Q

Interviews

A

In sociological research, there are different types of interviews: structured interviews and unstructured interviews (including group interviews). Sociologists sometimes use semi-structured interviews to combine the elements of both. Structured interviews are favoured by positivists because they are rich in reliability and representativity, whereas unstructured interviews are favoured by interpretivists because they are rich in validity.

25
Structured interviews
The positivist favoured method of structured interviews involve face-to-face or over-the-phone delivery of a questionnaire. In turn, they use a list of pre-set questions designed by the researcher and asked of all interviewees in the same way.
26
ADVANTAGES
Practical - training interviewers is easy and cheap Practical - Cheap and easy to administer Representative - can reach a geographically wide research sample Results are easily quantifiable because they use closed-ended questions with coded answers Reliable - the structured process provides a ‘recipe’ for reproducibility
27
DISADVANTAGES
Lack of validity: the use of closed-ended and pre-coded answers may not fit what the interviewee wishes to say Lack of validity: People may lie or exaggerate
28
unStructured interviews
The interpretivist favoured method of unstructured interviews mainly ask open-ended questions that produce qualitative data rich in meaning. There is a strong relationship built between the interviewer and the interviewee, which means the data is more likely to be valid.
29
ADVANTAGES
Rapport - the informality allows the interviewer to develop a relationship with the interviewee Flexibility - the interviewer is not restricted to a fixed set of questions Valid - they are flexible, due to how the conversation is not constrained by fixed questions - people can be more truthful
30
DISADVANTAGES
Practical - time consuming, due to how unstructured interviews are typically longer, and expensive due to training interviewers in sensitivity Unrepresentative - due to small research samples, data obtained is not representative of the wider population Not reliable - due to how the questions are open, they cannot be easily repeated by another researcher. Additionally, the respondent's ability to respond in the way they wish makes it impossible to clarify their responses.
31
semi-Structured interviews
A qualitative method of inquiry that combines a pre-determined set of open questions (questions that prompt discussion) with the opportunity for the interviewer to explore particular themes or responses further.
32
ADVANTAGES
Large amount of detail generated. Fairly flexible and sensitive. Easier to analyse than unstructured interviews.
33
DISADVANTAGES
Can't guarantee honesty of participants. Cause and effect cannot be inferred. Flexibility of interview may lessen reliability. Open-ended questions are difficult to analyse. Difficult to compare answers.
34
Observations
Observations in sociological research take several different forms; they can either be participant or non-participant, meaning that the researcher is directly involved in one but not the other. Although participating in observations gives a direct insight into social behaviour, this is likely to produce the Hawthorne effect due to how participants are aware they are being studied and will change their behaviour accordingly. Additionally, observations can be either covert or overt; the former means the research group are aware the observation is taking place, whereas the latter means the research group do not know they are being researched.
35
participant observations
The researcher joins in the activities of the group they are researching.
36
ADVANTAGES
Valid- groups are observed in a natural and authentic setting, therefore the data is more likely to be a true account of the group’s behaviour. Valid - data generate is richly detailed and offers insight into social behaviour.
37
DISADVANTAGES
Unreliable - being open-ended and subjective research, there is no fixed procedure or standardised system of measurement and cannot be replicated. Unrepresentative - most participant observations investigate small-scale groups that are not representative of the wider population. Not valid - the Hawthorne effect, due to how the observer is likely to affect the group's behaviour, and the researcher is at risk of ‘going native’, meaning the researcher over-identifies with the group. Ethical issues - it is difficult to ensure anonymity of participants. Practical issues - there are issues with getting into the group, staying in the group and/or leaving the group
38
non-participant observations
The observer avoids any direct involvement with the research group.
39
ADVANTAGES
Valid - limited risk of the researcher ‘going native’.
40
DISADVANTAGES
Not reliable - each observation will be subjective, and therefore cannot be repeated. Not representative - involves a small-scale research sample.
41
overt observations
The researcher explains their research intention to the group, so the research subjects are aware they are being observed.
42
ADVANTAGES
Less ethical issues than covert because the participants know they're being researched. Higher level of reliability than covert. The observer can openly take notes. Allows researcher to use interview methods too
43
DISADVANTAGES
Practical - Time consuming. Lacks validity - Hawthorne effect. Less reliable - Difficult to repeat. Not always representative.
44
Covert observations
The researcher keeps their real identity and purpose secret from research subjects.
45
ADVANTAGES
More valid than overt because there is lack of the Hawthorne effect. Research obtained is more valid because you have a first-hand insight. Find out more in-depth detail about why, who, where, when etc.
46
DISADVANTAGES
Ethical issues - it is immoral to deceive people. Researcher has to gain trust and acceptance (this may be time consuming)
47
official statistics
Official statistics are quantitative data collected by government bodies. This method is favoured by positivists because data is quick, cheap and easy to access, and it covers a wide range of social issues.
48
advantages
Practical - cheap, easy to obtain and easy to access. For example, through the Office of National Statistic's website. Collected at regular interviews, so you can compare trends over time. For example, the census is completed every 10 years. Representative - official statistics often cover large groups of people. For example, crime statistics are compiled by police across the entire country
49
disadvantages
The government collects these statistics for its own benefit, so they may not cover what sociologists specifically want to study. Definitions may be different. For example, what the government considers 'poverty may not be the same as a sociologist
50
Documents
Documents are secondary data, favoured by interpretivists, which are created by individuals, groups and organisations. They mainly contain qualitative data that expresses beliefs and meanings held by an individual and/or organisation. Different types of documents include personal private documents and historical documents
51
PERSONAL DOCUMENTS
Personal documents take the form of diaries, memoirs, autobiographies and letters
52
ADVANTAGES
Valid - Written for personal purposes so will have a high degree of validity and provide an in-depth and genuine insight into people's attitudes. Practical - They are cheap and save researcher's time. Illuminates many areas of social life. Can be used to confirm or question other interpretations and accounts
53
DISADVANTAGES
Some groups are unlikely to produce personal documents such as letters and diaries and so their views aren't represented while those with time and literacy skills may be over represented. Personal documents such as letters are written with an audience in mind and may affect what is being recorded. Personal bias is likely to be present.
54
Historical DOCUMENTS
Historical documents provide evidence from the past.
55
ADVANTAGES
They allow comparisons over time (for example birth, death and marriage rates) They are useful when assessing the outcomes of various social policies (Eg. raising the school leaving age)
56
DISADVANTAGES
Un-representative - some documents may have been lost or destroyed The validity of the documents are open to question as they may have been written selectively The authenticity of a document is open to question as it might not have been written by the person it is attributed to, therefore undermining its reliability
57
Methods in Context
Education is a unique setting for research and includes specific elements that may change the way in which research is conducted. This will all depend on the theme, the method and the topic involved.