Research 2 Exam 2 Study Guide Flashcards
(117 cards)
What was the point of the video we watched?
The point of the video we watched was to show us an example of how a researcher had broken ethics in the way of fraud/fabrication of data. A student showed this to Lewandowski and it is a more interesting way to teach the topic of open science.
What’s the difference between replication and reproducibility? Which is more likely to work? Why?
Replication means that we can use the data they provide, run what they ran, and receive the same results as the study. This is a check to make sure that they did their analyses correctly and did not complete an underhanded act of breaking ethics.
Generally, what are questionable research practices?
Practices that are sketchy. They seem suspicious and the choice is not appropriate to a researcher.
What is HARKing? b) Distinguish between testing hypotheses & exploratory findings.
Harking is hypothesizing after collecting data and analysis. In this questionable practice, they find data and then say oh yeah I expected this to happen. Liar, you just looked for a pattern and then claimed it all along. When our studies go through the IRB, we have to submit our hypothesis among other information in advance to any data collection. Testing your hypothesis means that you formulate your research question and then you set up your experiment, collect data, and then in your findings, determine if your hypothesis was supported or rejected. Exploratory findings are not created before the experiment, but done after you have the data. They are just some thing you wanted to look into or explore but not a hypothesis you test.
What is p-Hacking? What are the 3 ways of doing that?
P-hacking is probability hacking, which means you affect your probability.
1.Cherry picking
2.Run your study until it works (e.g., analyze every 5 participants.
3.Play with variables to get them to work (e.g., selectively drop/include items)
How often does falsifying data/fraud happen?
Not very often, it was reported 0.6 the BTS nerds who check the data found 1.7, although doubled, is still pretty low.
What is preregistration? Why do we do that? Will this stop fraud/fabrication?
stating your hypothesis before conducting your study. Often in a public forum. We do it to show that out hypothesis was in fact created prior to the testing. It will prevent not stop fraud because there are multiple ways to commit fraud, this would only be stopping people from testing the study and then claiming that they knew it all along. It would not stop people from faking data.
What are the three tenets of open science? Describe each. Which one helps with reproducibility? Which one helps with replication?
preregistration (keeps you honest), open data (every one can analyze your exact same data) reproducibility and open materials (replicability) can redo your study with their own participants.
a) Give your own example of a double negative (including what it actually says). b) How does this apply to hypothesis testing?
a) I don’t disagree with you (I agree with you), you ain’t going nowhere(you’re going somewhere)
b) fail to reject the null
a) I am not never going to study. ( I am going to study)
b)In hypothesis testing, in order to reject the null we make a double negative. The null is that there is no difference, we show that there is not no difference (there is a difference) and we reject the null.
What is the null hypothesis?
states there is no effect (change, difference) and the populations are the same The opposite of what we are hypothesizing. SImilar to a straw man argument we are setting it up to hopefully tear it down and support our hypothesis.
Hypothesis test require that we start off assuming we’re wrong (with the null hypothesis). Give your own example of how this approach could be beneficial in another context.
This approach could be beneficial if we were in an ethical dilemma. If I thought it was possible my boss was committing fraud, but I did not have proof. It is better to assume I am wrong, and she is not committing fraud. THen I would talk to my boss and ask what they are doing. If it is fraud then I would report it, but if it isn’t then I end the process there. (If i assumed there was fraud when there was not (type 1 error) then they would have done all the extra processing and investigating to turn up with no fraud.
a) List the 5 steps of hypothesis testing? b) In your words, describe what we’re generally doing in each. (we talked a bit about this in class, but also refer to the Table on pg 188)
a) First you have to label(establish) your population and your hypothesis. You need to know who you want to test/take a sample from and what you are looking for.
Then you need to build a comparison distribution
Third you establish the critical value cutoff
FOurth you determine the sample results
Finally you decide and interpret
b)state who you want to test/take sample from and what you are looking for (hypothesizing)
Then you need context so you have to see what or who you are comparing to. You should create a normal distribution.
Next, you establish the cutoff you must state what value or percentage you must reach in order for your result to count.
After that, you determine your sample results, conduct your study and receive the findings
Last, you compare the sample results to the cutoff and make a decision about the study.
Distinguish between Type 1 and Type 2 error. Which is a false positive? Which is a false negative?
A type 1 error is when we claim something is true when it is false. (We say there is a ghost, when there is not ghost). This is a false positive because we think it is true but in actuality it is not. Fake true.
A type 2 error is when we claim something is false when it is true. We fail to reject the null when we should. (We say there is nothing there when there actually is a ghost). This is a false negative because we think it is false but in actuality it is not. Fake False.
Interpreting p values. is this significant?
a) 5.43 4.47 N=1000
most definitely
Interpreting p values. is this significant?
b) 5.43 4.27 N=63
probably not if 63 is small sample
Interpreting p values. is this significant?
8.21 8.64 N=1,999,999
Most Definitely
Interpreting p values. is this significant?
8.64 8.21 N=6
Definitely Not
Interpreting p values. Is this significant?
5.55 5.73 N= 200
definitely not
Interpreting p values. Is this significant?
6.78 9.91 N=200
most definitely
Interpreting p values. effect size? significant? meaningful?
a) 5.43 4.27 p=.03
small effect, significant, not meaningful
Interpreting p values. effect size? significant? meaningful?
5.43 4.27 p=.78
small effect, Not significant, not meaningful
Interpreting p values. effect size? significant? meaningful?
8.21 8.64 p=.002
small effect size, significant, not meaningful
Interpreting p values. effect size? significant? meaningful?
8.64, 8.21 p=.10
small effect size, Not significant, not meaningful
Interpreting p values. effect size? significant? meaningful?
5.55 3.98 p=.000
Big effect size, impossible significance, meaningful?