Research Design & Ethics + Ch4 Flashcards

(53 cards)

1
Q

Research design

A

A master plan that specifies the methods that will be used to collect and analyze the information needed for a research project

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Research Ethics: Step 1 - Translating business qs into research qs

A
  • Avoid conflicts of interest
  • Emphasize substance over flash
  • Look for what’s there, not what you want to see
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Research Ethics: Step 2 - Design research program to answer research questions

A

Valid appropriate experimental design
- Design experiments that are replicable
- Minimize risk and maximize benefit
- Avoid experimenter demand
- Avoid confirmation bias

Valid appropriate sampling plans
- Respect vulnerable populations
- Avoid excluding people from participation or benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Experimenter demand / demand effect

A

The participant is trying to please the experimenter by giving them the result that they are looking for

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Research Ethics: Step 3 - Collect Data

A

Fair, respectful, and professional treatment of participants:
- Obtain informed consent
- Participation is optional and can be discontinued at any time
- Respect privacy and confidentiality

eg: Milgram Experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Research Ethics: Step 4 - Analyze Research Results

A

Valid, appropriate data handling
- Maintain data security
- Do not omit, alter, create or otherwise tamper with data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Research Ethics: Step 5 - Interpret research findings and make recommendations

A

Valid appropriate data interpretation
- Avoid biased interpretation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Research Ethics: Step 6 - Communicate recommendations to business audiences

A

Transparent communication
- Avoid the file drawer problem (publishing studies which have only significant results and omitting studies which do not)
- Disclose methods
- Disclose sample details

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

3 things to designing a research program by

A

By source
By methodology
By objectives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Designing research programs by data source

A

Primary = collection of new data
Secondary = data previously collected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Designing research programs by methodology

A

Qualitative:
- Interviews
- Observation
- Focus groups
- Text and image analysis
- Diary studies

Quantitative:
- Panel data (secondary)
- Surveys (primary)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Designing research programs by objectives (EDC)

A

Exploratory (gather insights, formulate hypothesis)
Descriptive (size and characteristics of target market)
Causal/experimental (test hypothesis, response to market mix changes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Exploratory research

A

Seeks to define an ambiguous problem
- May be conducted as part of problem definition
- Gains background info
- Defines terms
- Clarifies problem/hypothesis
- Establishes research priorities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Methods of conducting exploratory research (SCEF)

A

Secondary data
Case analysis
Experience surveys
Focus groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When is exploratory research complete?

A

When the problem is fully defined
- Root problems, not just symptoms
- No more “whys”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Descriptive research

A

Seeks to describe a defined problem
- Answers to questions of who, what, where, when, and how
eg: where do they buy brands, who their customers are, how they find out about products, etc
- More rigid than exploratory research
- We want to project a study’s findings to a larger population
eg: understand the average customer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Methods of conducting descriptive research (CSLPBM)

A

Cross-sectional studies
Sample surveys
Longitudinal studies
Panels (continuous = same questions, discontinuous/omnibus = vary questions)
Brand-switching studies
Market-tracking studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Causal research

A

Seeks to answer a defined & described problem
- Determine causality
- Most rigid
eg: does increasing sugar content affect sales?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Methods of conducting causal research

A

Experiments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Experiment

A

Where one or more independent variables are manipulated to see how one or more dependent variables are affected, while also controlling the effects of extraneous variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Extraneous variable

A

All variables other than IVs that have an effect on DVs

eg: 1s faster per lap because of driver? (extraneous variables: aero, tyres)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Experimental design

A

A procedure for devising an experimental setting so that a change in a DV may be attributed solely to the change in an IV

23
Q

Before-after testing

A

An experimental design in which a DV is measured before and after an IV is changed

24
Q

Control group

A

A group whose subjects have not been exposed to the change in an IV

25
Experimental group
A group whose subjects have been exposed to the change in IV
26
Pretest
A measurement of the DV that is taken prior to changing the IV
27
Posttest
A measurement of the DV that is taken after changing the IV
28
Internal validity
Accurate results need large sample sizes, true randomization, clear cause-and-effect relationship between variables Helps ensure findings are due to the IV
29
External validity
Generalizing results to another group. Need to replicate findings with different populations and different contexts
30
Ecological validity
The study needs to mimic what happens in real life
31
Lab experiments
IVs are manipulated and measures of the DVs are taken in an artificial setting for the purpose of controlling all extraneous variables
32
Field experiments
IVs are manipulated, and the measurements of the DV are taken in their natural setting
33
Test marketing
conducting an experiment or study in a field setting to evaluate a new product or service or other elements of the marketing mix
34
3 types of test markets
Standard test market Controlled test market Simulated test market
35
Standard test market
One in which the firm tests the product or marketing-mix variables through the company's normal distribution channels
36
Controlled test market
One that is conducted by outside research firms that guarantee distribution of the product through prespecified types and numbers of distributors
37
Simulated test market (STM)
One in which companies test new products in a staged environment that mimics natural conditions
38
Three criteria for selecting test market region
Representativeness Degree of isolation Ability to control distribution and promotion
39
Correlation
Two variables share some kind of relationship
40
Causation
One variable causes something to happen in another variable
41
Correlation can be explained by 4 ways
One-way causality Two-way causality A "confound" Spurious correlation
42
One-way causality
One variable is the cause of the other one eg: change in x = change in y
43
Two-way causality
Both variables may be the cause of each other eg: change in x = change in y = change in x again
44
A "confound"
A third variable may be responsible for correlation eg: change in z = affects change in x and y
45
Spurious correlation
A mathematical relationship in which two events or variables have no causal connection
46
Moderator variable
A second IV changes the effect of your manipulated variable (initial IV) on the DV eg: amount of exercise (IV), age (MV), weight loss (DV)
47
How to determine if a question is correlational or experimental design?
When you can not manipulate a variable, such as the right-left-handedness of someone, it is not experimental design
48
How to control an experiment to determine causality
Manipulate one thing at a time Randomly assign participants to different levels of constant variables eg: manipulate only IV, while holding all other variables constant
49
2 types of study design
Within-subject design Between-subjects design
50
Within-subjects design
All participants are exposed to all conditions of the IV Measures the same subset of participants at different times (eg: check blood pressure before meds, check blood pressure after med)
51
Between-subjects design
Measure different subsets of participants, each subset having different exposure to IV, at the same time (randomly assign participants to group A or group B, measure group A and group B at the same time)
52
6 considerations to finding evidence for a causal relationship
1. What is the research question 2. What are the variables of interest 3. Should you use a correlational or experimental design? 4. What are the conditions? 5. Should you use a within-subjects design or between-subjects design 6. Should the study be in the lab or field
53