Research for Evidence Based Practice and Systemic Reviews Flashcards

1
Q

Why need research for animal management

A
  • find research gaps
  • overcome limits in management
  • cure/prevent disease
  • increase/maintain productivity
  • improve welfare
  • sustainability
  • profit
  • prevent losses form death/disease
  • improve public perception
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lameness in sheep

  • 2004 % sheep lame
  • what is footrot
  • cost to sheep industry
A
  • 10% (80% caused by footrot)
  • bacterial disease that causes inflammation of foot/hoof and results in wt loss, pain, distress and reduced productivity (DLWG)
  • pain = hoof come away from foot, increase cortisol levels and stress
  • less likely to jump females = reduce mating/lambs
  • £24 million
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

King et al 2013 - lameness

A
  • wanted to see if routine foot trimming actually helps prevent lameness and famers perceptions on results
  • no difference in lameness prevalence/foot damage/level of footrot and interdigital dermatitis
  • farmers who use RFT reluctant to stop
  • farmers with large flocks and high lameness prevelance more likely to stop.
  • barriers to uptake recomendations: habbit, no disadvantage to stopping, need longer trials/larger no. sheep/ more variables (geography/soil/season)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Current practices preventing lameness in sheep

- FAWC targets

A
  • farm animal welfare council
  • lameness reduced from 10% to 5% by 2016 and 2% by 2021
    hit 2016 target but not further
  • average lameness = 3.2%, 52% farmers = <2%
  • Best et al 2020
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Current practices preventing lameness in sheep

- % farmers carrying out management practices

A
  • Clifton and Green 2017
  • routine foot trimming at least once a year is not recommended: 2004 = 76% 2013= 56%
  • always use trimming to treat foot rot not recomended: 2004 = 76%
    2013 = 40%
  • always use antibiotic injection to treat foot rot is recommended: 2004= 10% 2013=24%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Positive factors that aid implementation

A
  • greater evidence
  • recommendations by well known body (FAWC)
  • benefits clearly described
  • accessible written information - five point plan
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Five point plan

A
  • Cull = build resistance
  • Vaccine = establish immunity
  • Avoid, treat, quarantine = reduce disease challenge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Barriers to implement research findings

A
  • unlicensed product for certain use
  • reluctant people (habbit, lack of participation)
  • lack of funding
  • lack of staff/time
  • generational changes
  • relavence of research
  • severity of problem
  • lack of evidence/education
  • bad previous experiences
  • impact of outcome
  • how quick see results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are systemic reviews and evidence based practice examples

A

= an analysis of secondary data
- assess and analyses all available literature following a distinct methodology to answer a specific research question

  • Evidence-based veterinary medicine
  • Evidence-based agriculture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

5 steps of systemic reviews

A
  • Ask - identify/fram question proffesion need answers to
  • Aquire - find best available evidence on subject of interest
  • Appraise - appraise literature for quality and sources of bias that may affect validity of results (eliminate papaers)
  • Summarise the evidence and extract
  • interpret findings/results, analyse results. Meta-analysis if appropriate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

PICO method (ask)

A
  • patient or population - who, specific as possible (e.g. geriatric dogs, puppies, spaniels
  • intervention - what intervention interested in e.g. management strategy, diagnostic test, type of food)
  • comparison/control - main alturnative (e.g. another management strategy want to compare, control, no intervention)
  • outcome - what trying to acheive, measure, improve (e.g. what are the patient relevant consequences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

PICO (acquire) what to do next

A
  • identify synonyms and related terms

- different authours use different terms to reffer to same concept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

EBVM appraise

A
  • critically appraise articles
  • strenghts/weaknesses
  • bias
  • study design
  • subjects
  • methodologies used and how well performed
  • statistical analysis
  • presentation and interpretation of results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Advantages of systematic reviews

A
  • access to large quantity of data
  • results more applicable to species poplation
  • identify research gaps
  • advance practices quality
  • identify areas which research should not focus
  • draw strong conclusions = decrease time from research discoveries to implementation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Limitations of systemic reviews

A
  • many studies excluded due to incomplete reporting of data/methods
  • variability in methods used to generate data between studies
  • publication bias (more publications of studies with positive result)
  • criteria for appraisal will vary between researchers
  • data often funded by commercial organisations, possible bias
  • lack of large scale studies
  • lack of previous research available to draw ideas
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Example - population management strategies in dogs: about, management strategies

A
  • 700 million domestic dogs (2019)
  • 75% free roaming
  • public health (300 zoonoses to human)
  • welfare (emaciated body condition 50% in india)
  • environment (pathogen polution predation, competition, hybridisation)
  • cull, long term shelter, fertility control
  • taxation for dog ownership
  • public education
17
Q

Example - population management strategies in dogs: indicators of effect, limitations

A
  • dog demographics
  • dog health and welfare
  • public perceptions of free roaming dogs
  • dog population size
  • studies within review often no control group (difficult to ascertain effect of management overtime)
  • often more than one management strategy used (hard to determine effect of one specific strategy
  • insufficient detail in methods to determine level of management (e.g. what proportion of dogs neutered or put into shelters)
18
Q

Example - population management strategies in dogs: conclusions

A
  • where/when has impact of dog population management been assessed = many countries globally, researches/gov/animal welfare groups
  • management methods used = range of methods in unison with different indicators of impact assessed
  • what effect has management had on population size, dog health/welfare, public health risk, public attitude, risk to wildlife populations = robust conclusion could not be drawn. management overall has +ve impact. recommendations for future studies with reporting quality to allow stronger evidence base for systematic review
19
Q

Example: rotavirus in horses

  • what it causes
  • strains
  • prevention
A
  • group A rotavirus major cause of diarrhea and related mortality in foals up to 3 months old = 50-90% of cases
  • infection results in damage to small intestine absorption, dehydration due to watery diarrhoea and death
  • non-enveloped virus
  • 14 G (glycoprotein and 14 P (protease sensitive) serotypes characterised
  • G3P[12] and G14P[12] most freq reported in molecular epidemilogical studies world wide
  • vaccination curent method to prevent/reduce RVA incidence ~ used on pregnant mares to increase RVA specific antibody levels in colostrum
  • inactivated vaccines to prevent diarrhoea = UK H-2 inactivated strain, argentina use 3 strains, japan HO-5 equine RVA strain since 2001
20
Q

What is EBVM

A

the use of best relevant evidence in conjunction with clinical expertise to make the best possible decision about a veterinary patient

21
Q

Example: rotavirus in horses - study results

A
  • 51.3% samples collected positive for RVA
  • G/p types determined = 83.4%
  • Out of g types: most prevalent G3 = 51.7% followed by G14 = 32.6%
  • Out of p types; most prevalent P[12] = 90.3%
  • most widespread G type identified in all continents = G3 (48-72.4%)
  • out of 12 counties, only japan could provide relavent data within a large period of time ~ G14 gained increasing significance since 1990s when first reported
22
Q

Example: rotavirus in horses - limitations

A
  • whether data from 12 countries truley represents complete molecular diversity of global equine RVA strain prevalence
  • most data from single country (japan- 72% of all G type data)
  • other countries with relevant data all temperate climates and industrial
  • studies only reported data from domestic horses of high value (mostly race horses), additional diversity in wild horses or breeds and horses for different purposes. Rearing conditions may have genotypic impact
  • papers included for analysis not unifrm in study design and data presentation which made comparisons across studies difficult
23
Q

Example: rotavirus in horses - conclusions

A
  • once vaccination routine in countires where economic losses are recorded and animal welfare concerns rise, launching strain survalence to monitor vacine effectiveness will be important
  • genonome sequencing used alongside vaccine uptake
  • aid tracing interspecies transmission of RVA and could help implement more effective vaccine events