Research Methods 1&2 Flashcards

(171 cards)

1
Q

Aim

A

a statement of what the researchers intend to find out in a study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hypothesis

A

a precise and testable statement of prediction about outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Null

A

no difference between groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Experimental

A

predict difference between groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Directional

A

suggest direction of results used if previous shows one thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Non-directional

A

suggests no direction of results normally has no previous research or has conflicting research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

IV

A

variable that researcher manipulates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

DV

A

variable that researcher measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Extraneous

A

variables that could effect the IV that is not the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Confounding

A

when extraneous variables not controlled can damage validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Situational

A

features of a situation that could effect results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Order effects

A

order taken for tests can effect results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Counterbalancing

A

ABBA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Participant variables

A

individual differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Investigator Effects

A

experimenter unconsciously conveys to ppts how they should behave, called experimenter bias
experimenter is often unaware of the influence which they are exerting, but they have an influence nevertheless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Double Blind Design

A

ppt and conductor blind to aims of hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Inter-rater/observer Reliability

A

independent raters, rate and compare
single observers may miss important details or may only notice events that confirm their hypothesis
2 observers should carry out a experiment so their is no bias and compare results and discuss differences, correlating each pair of results and an overall figure is made
observe behaviour at same time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Demand Characteristics

A

if ppts guess the experiments intention change behaviour to suit aims
they may think they are doing this to be helpful - but its not actually helpful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Independent groups

A

different ppts take part in different conditions
i.e. group A listen to music while revising group B do not, results are compared
usually, ppts would be randomly allocated to each condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Repeated Measures

A

every ppt takes part in every condition (results are compared to themselves)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Matched Pairs

A

different but similar ppts are used in each condition
they are matched on variables relevant to the study
monozygotic twins can be good for this as they are genetically perfectly matched

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Population

A

refers to a large group of individuals who the researcher may be interested in studying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Target Population

A

group of people who take part in the research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Sample

A

desired sub-group of the population to be studied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Random Sample
all ppts have an equal chance of being selected
26
What should an aim be
clear and detailed outline the purpose of the study
27
What shouldnt an aim be
a question
28
Operationalise
to make measurable
29
What a good hypothesis should include
all conditions groups/ comparisons prediction .....will be should be directional or non-directional operationalised
30
Internal Validity
are we measuring what we intend to measure ,only thing effecting DV is IV
31
Examples of Situational Variables
heat time of day order effects e.g. two tests in a row might be fatigued or might get better, solution is splitting group and having one do the test in AB order and the others in BA order
32
Examples of Participant Variables
mood IQ anxiety concentration
33
Controlling Investigator Effects
double blind deign, both the ppt and conductor are blind to the aims of hypothesis experimenter may be unaware which variable the ppt is involved in inter-rater reliability, independent raters rate same behaviours and then check agreement
34
Screw-you Effect
deliberately try to hinder the experiment
35
Controlling Demand Characteristics
single blind design - the ppt is unaware of which condition they are in or the researcher aims, this prevents the ppts from seeking clues about the aims and reacting to them deception - lying about the aims of the study and/ or using distracting questions
36
Extraneous or Confounding
when extraneous variables are not controlled by the experimenter, they become confounding variables that can damage validity of the experiment
37
Independent Groups Strengths
avoids order effects (such as practice or fatigue) as people participate in one condition only avoids demand characteristics as people are less likely to guess aims
38
Independent Groups Limitations
more people are needed than with the repeated measures design (more time consuming + expensive) differences between participants in the groups may effect the results, for example variation in age, gender, social behaviour
39
Repeated Measures Strengths
as the same ppts are used in each condition ppt variables are reduced fewer people needed
40
Repeated Measures Limitations
there may be order effects, this limitation can be controlled using counterbalancing demand characteristics, ppts guess aims and change behaviour
41
Matched Pairs Strengths
reduces ppts variables because the researcher has tried to pair us the ppts so that each condition has people with similar abilities and characteristics avoids order effects
42
Matched Pairs Limitations
if one ppt drops out you lose two ppts data very time consuming to find closely matched pairs impossible to match people exactly even identical twins
43
Four Types of Experiments
lab, field, natural, quasi
44
Laboratory Experiment
conducted in highly controlled environments (not always a literal lab) could be in a classroom in which conditions have been controlled in
45
Laboratory Experiment Strengths
uses a standardised procedure and is easy to replicate high control of extraneous variables, allows cause and effect to be established highly controlled makes accurate measurements possible
46
Laboratory Experiments Limitations
settings may not reflect real life and therefore no ecological validity demand characteristics could be an issue ppts know they are being studied which could pose a problem because of the Hawthorne effect could be time consuming and expensive compared to other methods
47
Natural Experiments
when the researcher takes advantage of a naturally occurring independent variable iv would have occurred despite if the experimenter were interested or not setting for this type does not have to be natural
48
Natural Experiments Strengths
this type of study might be especially useful in studying phenomena that would be unethical to manipulate
49
Natural Experiments Limitations
can only be used when IV occurs naturally ppts cannot be randomly allocated to these groups, there is strong likelihood of confounding variables researcher has no control over IV as it will have occurred in everyday life
50
Quasi Experiments
has an IV based on an existing difference between people, it has not been manipulated it just exists experimenter does not control IV can occur in lab conditions
51
Quasi Experiment Strength
often conducted in controlled conditions and so shares the strength of a lab study
52
Quasi Experiment Limitation
can only be used when IV varies naturally ppts cannot be randomly allocated to these groups, there is strong likelihood of confounding variables
53
Field Experiments
conducted in a real, every day setting in the real world experimenter still manipulates IV in this type of experiment
54
Field Experiments Strengths
high ecological validity because it is done in the ppts environment if study is covert much less chance of DC happening
55
Field Experiments Limitations
more difficult to control extraneous variables in this type of experiment making it harder for other researchers to replicate
56
Generalisation and Bias
ideally the sample that is drawn will be representative of the target population so that generalisation of findings becomes possible difficult to achieve due to diverse nature of individuals
57
Random Sample Methods
need a list of whole target population 1 - put these names/ numbers in a hat 2 - random name generator choose relevant number or name
58
Random Sample Strengths
is free from researcher bias (no influence over whose selected)
59
Random Sample Limitations
time consuming and can be difficult to conduct no guarantee they are representative
60
Opportunity Sample
those people who are available at the time and are willing to take part
61
Opportunity Sample Strengths
it is a quick and easy/ convenient way of choosing ppts
62
Opportunity Sample Limitations
researcher bias - could approach people who look helpful unrepresentative of target population
63
Volunteer Sample
ppts put themselves forward to be part of the sample
64
Volunteer Sample Strengths
easy and requires minimal input, so less effort and time consuming for reseacher
65
Volunteer Sample Limitations
volunteer bias - type of person
66
Systematic Sample
every nth person of the target population is selected to take part
67
Systematic Sample Strengths
avoids researcher bias, once system has been established the researcher has no influence over who is chosen
68
Systematic Sample Limitations
difficult to achieve, time consuming no guarantee it will be truly representative
69
Stratified Sampling
the researcher identifies the different types of people that make up the target population and work out the proportion needed for the sample to be representative
70
Stratified Sample Strength
avoids researcher bias designed to be representative of the population
71
Stratified Sample Limitation
stratification is not perfect difficult to have complete list of general population
72
Sampling - representative, time consuming, biased
most representative to least representative stratified, random, systematic, opportunity, volunteer most time consuming to least time consuming stratified, systematic, random, volunteer, opportunity most biased to least biased opportunity, volunteer, stratified/ random/ systematic
73
BPS
the British Psychological Society is the representative body for psychology and psychologists in the UK, and is responsible for the proportion of excellence and ethical practice in science, education, practical applications of the discipline the principles are: respect, competence, responsibility, integrity if researchers break code of conduct they face losing their job
74
Ethical Issues
informed consent right to withdraw privacy confidentiality protection from harm deception
75
Informed Consent
involves making ppts aware of the aims of the research, the procedures, their rights and also what their data will be used for, only then can the ppts make an informed judgement of whether they wish to participate
76
Right to Withdraw
this is available for ppts after they find out everything about the investigation and are completely informed
77
Privacy
ppts have the right to control information about themselves, this is the right to privacy
78
Confidentiality
if privacy is invaded then confidentiality should be protected, it refers to our right to have any personal data protected
79
Protection from Harm
ppts should not be placed at any more risk than they would be in their daily lives, and should be protected from psychological and physical harm
80
Deception
means deliberately misleading or withholding information from ppts at any stage of the investigation
81
Ideal Consent Form
what will they be asked to do and why things they may experience how there data will be used time duration remind them of right to withdraw give options check box for participation give opportunity to ask questions signature, name, date over 16 can sign it under has to be parent
82
Alternative ways of getting consent
presumptive consent - ask a similar group of people if agreed, consent of ppts is presumed prior general consent - ppts agree to take part in study they are consenting to being deceived retrospective consent - asked after having already taken part
83
Dealing with Ethical Issues (deception and protection from harm)
ppts offered a full debrief of experiment, contains true details of experiments, aims, conditions, what data will be used for and given right to withdraw data, ppts may require therapy researcher should provide
84
Case Studies
case studies are in depth investigations of a single person, group event or community, typically data is gathered from a variety of sources and by using several different methods
85
Case Studies Strengths
provides detailed information provides insight for further research permitting investigation of otherwise impractical or unethical situations
86
Case Studies Limitations
providing little bias for generalization of results in the wider population researchers own subjective feelings may influence the case study difficult to replicate time-consuming and expensive
87
Pilot Studies
a pilot is a small scale run of the actual investigation and may involve only a few ppts they are run for: experiments, self-report measures, observations
88
Pilot Studies Evaluation
used to test the experiments effectiveness and make improvement before the real thing allows them to identify issues early then rectify them saving time and money any part of the study could be measured e.g. validity, how long it takes, if instructions are too complicated
89
Naturalistic Observation
takes place in the setting or context the target behaviour would usually occur
90
Controlled Observation
there is some control over variables to observe effects and also control extraneous variables
91
Participant Observation
the observer joins in the scenario being observed
92
Non-participant Observation
the observer is separate from scenario being observed
93
Covert Observation
the ppts dont know that they are being observed
94
Overt Observation
the ppts know that they are being observed
95
A03 Naturalistic vs Controlled
ecological validity - naturalistic because it happens in a natural setting high EV extraneous variables - controlled, less variables replicability - can be replicated in controlled setting
96
A03 Covert vs Overt
ethics - in overt situations people know they are being filmed DC - covert you wouldnt know you are being observed therefore behaviour wouldnt change
97
A03 Participant vs Non-participant
more insight - participant, would understand ppts feelings objectivity - non-participant, will be more objective
98
Behavioural Categories
when a target behaviour is categorised into components that are observable and measurable, something you can see no interpretation categories must be exclusive and not overlap
99
Event Sampling
count every time a behaviour occurs during observation
100
Time Sampling
count behaviours that occur in smaller time frames e.g. every five minutes count for 1 minute
101
Time Sampling Evaluation
could miss infrequent behaviours less effort for researcher
102
Event Sampling Evaluation
can catch infrequent behaviours more effort for researcher
103
Questionnaires
set of written questions - designed to collect information can discuss what people think or feel always pre-determined can be quantitative or qualitative used to asses DV
104
Quantitative
numerical - closed
105
Qualitative
non-numerical - open
106
Writing Good Questions
clarity - do not use double negatives jargon - refers to technical terms that are only familiar to those in a specialised area bias - do not use leading questions which make one answer more attractive than the other analysis - questions need to be written so they are easy to analyse (open questions - hard to analyse, closed questions - easy to analyse)
107
Likert scale
respondents can indicate the extent to which they agree or disagree with a statement, usually five levels
108
Rating Scale
a means of assessing attitudes or experiences by asking a respondent to rate statements on a scale of 1 to 3 to 5
109
Fixed Choice Option
questions with pre-determined number of answers
110
Questionnaire Strengths
once you have designed a questionnaire you can use them for lost of people cheaply and quickly respondents may feel comfortable to reveal personal information can be completed without the investigator being present reduces experimenter bias which can be found in interviews no special experience needed to hand out questionnaires questionnaires with open questions can provide unexpected answers which can lead to further research
111
Questionnaire Limitations
can only be filled out by those who read and write questionnaires using closed questions, limit response however easier to summarise social desirability bias - answering questions in a way so you are deemed socially acceptable dont have to be honest acquiescence bias when a ppt just ticks and agrees with all questions
112
Structured Interviews
has pre-determined questions, face to face questionnaires no deduction from original questions
113
Unstructured Interviews
new questions developed during the course of the interview interview may begin with general aims more like a conversation
114
Semi-structured Interviews
many interviews fall in between job interview is semi-structured list of questions worked out in advance but interviews are also free to ask follow up questions when they feel appropriate
115
Structured Interview Evaluation
+ can be easily repeated because questions are standardised + different people can be compared due to the standard questions + answers are easier to analyse due to being predictable - comparability if interviewer is different or behaves differently - interviewer bias
116
Unstructured Interview Evaluation
+ more detailed information can be obtained - requires interviewer with more skills to develop questions - questions may lack objectivity due to quick creation - more expensive due to need for experienced interviewer - interviewer bias
117
Design of Interviews
record interviews to make sure all information taken down, visually or audially schedule standardised for ppt to reduce effect of interviewer bias an interviewer can effect answers by asking leading questions or hinting at the answers body language - open interested, closed uninterested
118
Effect of Interviewer
presence of an interviewer who is interested in the ppts answers may increase amount of information provided and vice versa
119
what are descriptive statistics
they show patterns and trends in data
120
what are the measures of central tendency
average - mean/median/mode
121
what are the measures of dispersion
spread - range/standard deviation
122
what are inferential statistics
they tell us of the likelihood that iv affected the dv p < 0.05 this is the conventional levels, 5% or less likely that a chance factor affected dv 95% or more likely iv affected dv
123
when can probability be lower
in drug trails it can be p < 0.01
124
1st step in choosing a stats test
test of difference (experiment between two conditions) or association - correlation
125
2nd step in choosing a stats test
experimental design independent groups - unrelated matched pairs - related repeated measure - related
126
3rd step in choosing a stats test
level of data you are using nominal/categorical ordinal data - can be ranked difference between rankings is not standardised interval - ranked with standardised gaps, published scale e.g. height, weight, temp
127
a test for: nominal data with independent groups
chi2
128
a test for: ordinal data with independent groups
mann-whitney
129
a test for: interval data with independent groups
unrelated t-test
130
a test for: nominal data with matched pairs or repeated measures
sign test
131
a test for: ordinal data with matched pairs or repeated measures
wilcoxon
132
a test for: interval data with matched pairs and repeated measures
related t-test
133
a test for: nominal data with a test of association
chi2
134
a test for: ordinal data with a test of association
spearmans
135
a test for: interval data with a test of association
pearsons
136
acronym for stats test
milk - mann-whitney will - wilcoxon spoil - spearmans unless - unrelated t-test refrigerated - related t-test properly - pearsons
137
which test wont always give you the calculated/observed value
sign test
138
type 1 error
error of optimists accept experimental, reject null when p value is too big false positive
139
type 2 error
error of pessimists accept null, reject experimental when p value is too small e.g. p<0.01 false negative
140
types of reliability
internal reliability external reliability
141
internal reliability
the extent to which something is consistent within itself, we asses internal reliability by using the split half method where we compare scores from one half of the test with scores on the other half
142
external reliability
the extent to which a test is consistent over several different occasions if the same interview was conducted with the same people one week and the next the outcome should be the same
143
test-retest reliability
testing the same group of patients on more than one occasion and checking that there is significant positive correlation between the two sets of scores, sufficient time must be allowed between tests so that the ppts dont remember the answers
144
inter-observer reliability
establishing reliability in observational research by using more than one observer to rate or code the different types of behaviour, two observers making recordings at the same time avoids research bias
145
ensuring reliability with the experimental method: standardisation
in an experiment make sure that the conditions are the same, everyone receives standardised instructions, everyone does the same task, all extraneous variables are controlled. this is to ensure that the research can be replicated
146
ensuring reliability with the experimental method: test/retest reliability
checks for variation in measurement taken by a single person with a single measurement tool for the same type of behaviour if the correlation between the two sets of scores is high then the measurement tool has good retest reliability
147
how to improve reliability
taking more than one measurement from each ppt and calculating an average score pilot studies - these ensure that the measure works and that all concerned can use the apparatus training researchers properly: particularly when a number of researchers are collecting data, this improves inter-rater reliability, a pilot study can also help standardise procedures and data recording techniques operationalising terms precisely so that all observers categorise behaviours in the same way
148
validity
does it measure what it is meant to measure
149
types of validity
external validity - ecological validity internal validity
150
external validity
can the results be generalised from the setting in which they are obtained
151
ecological validity
do the results reflect a persons real life behaviour, research carried out in a artificial environment like a lab does not
152
internal validity
does the experiment really measure the effects of the iv on the dv
153
further threats to validity
social desirability bias, investigator effects, order effects
154
how to control internal validity
consent, not informed consent (deception), independent groups design
155
ways of assessing validity
face validity concurrent validity predictive validity
156
face validity
do the questions look like they measure what the researcher intended to measure, are they obviously related to the topic
157
concurrent validity
check for this with a new research tool against an established tool, if the new research tool gives similar results than it has concurrent validity
158
predictive ability
check for this by assessing two sets of data at different times e.g. look at the correlation of an initial diagnosis of mental state compared to the actual state over time, if the predicted behaviour at the initial diagnosis has occurred, the diagnosis has validity
159
ways of improving validity and reliability
experimental research questionnaires observations qualitative methods
160
how are validity and reliability related
a study may be reliable but not valid however if a measurement is not reliable then it can not be valid
161
what should be included in a psychological report
title, abstract, introduction, aim, hypothesis, experimental/alternative hypothesis, method, procedure, results, discussion, references, appendix
162
what is in the abstract
this is always written last because it is a summary of the report about 150 words, abstracts provide an efficient way of gaining information without having to read an entire study, they contain all the essential information that a researcher would need to know about replicating the study
163
what is in the introduction
this tells everyone why the study is being carried out and the commentary should form a funnel of information, first there is a broad coverage of the background research, then the general research has been covered, the focus becomes much narrower finishing with the main researcher/research area you are hoping to refute. this then leads to the aim and the hypothesis
164
what is the aim
this covers exactly what it is you are hoping to find out and how
165
what is the hypothesis
this is a short testable statement, the independent variable must be operationalised and the dependent variable measurable, justification must be given for whether the test is to be directional or non-directional
166
what is the alternative hypothesis
going against the normal hypothesis
167
what is the method
this section is split inro sub-sections design: experimental, non-experimental method used -laboratory/field/natural or correlation or survey method design type - independent groups, related measures, matched pairs, correlation, observation, interview, IV, DV, EV, use of counterbalancing/ measures taken to avoid bias ethical issues, participants, relevant details of target population - age/socio-economic status, gender, etc relevant details of sample population, sampling method used, allocation to conditions, report of those who dropped out, materials, description of equipment used and how to use it
168
what is the procedure
this is a step by step guide of how the study was carried out - when, where, how, including details of how variables were operationalised, instructions to ppts must be standardised to allow replication
169
what is the results
this ection contains only a summary of the data, all raw data and calculations are put in the appendix, this generally starts with a section of descriptive statistics - measures of central tendency and dispersion. graphical representations of the data must also be clear and properly labelled and referred to in the text. one the summary statistics have been explained, there should be an analysis of the results of any inferential statistics, including observed values, how these related to the critical table value, significance level and whether the test was one or two tailed, this section finished with the rejection or acceptance of the null hypothesis
170
what is the discussion
begins with a statement of the findings and how these relate to the original hypothesis, all results are reported even if they do not fit in the hypothesis or science would not progress, all studies have flaws, so anything that went wrong, or the limitations of the study are discussed together with suggestions of how it could be improved if it were to be repeated . suggestions for alternative studies and future research can also be explored, the discussion ends with a paragraph summing up what was found and assessing the implication of the study and any conclusion that can be drawn from it
171
what is the refernces
every researcher cited in the text must be fully refernced using the harvard system, referncing is time consuming but is important in order to prevent plagarism