Research Methods Flashcards

1
Q

Qualitative research - interpretivists

A

These methods find descriptive data about an issue. For example what people think about an issue their opinions eg unstructured interviews and observations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Quantitative research - positivists

A

These methods try to be more factual and objective eg questionnaires and structured interviews

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Primary data

A

New data produced by researchers eg questionnaires, interviews and observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Secondary data

A

Data which already exists which can be used by researches eg official stats ,existing resources and documents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bias

A

Where the views of the researcher affect the research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Objectivity

A

Remaining neutral - researchers values does not affect their work - positivist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Reliability

A

If the same piece of research was repeated by a different sociologist then it should produce the same results (consistent) (repeatability) positivist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Representativeness

A

Sample shares the same characteristics as the population under study - positivist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Validity

A

The extent to which data gives a true picture of the subject being studied - interpretivists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Positivism

A

Social SCIENCE
Sociology adopts methods of natural sciences
Focus on objectivity, reliability, and representativeness
Quantitative research
Social facts
MACRO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Interpretivism

A
SOCIAL science
Focus on validity 
Verstehen (empathy)
Qualitative research 
Depth, detail, opinions and meanings 
micro
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Realism

A

Middle ground between positivist and interpretivists

Triangulation - using two or more different methods of research

Methodological pluralism - combining positivist and interpretivist approaches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ethical issues DRIPP

Rights and wrongs of research

A
Deception 
Right to withdraw 
Informed Vincent
Protection of participants 
Privacy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Practical issues TRAMP

A
Time (who will fund research TRM)
Resources
Access (gatekeeper)
Money 
Personal traits (CAGEs) (class age gender ethnicity sexuality) (could cause bias)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Theoretical PIQQ

A

Positivist
Interpretivist
Quantitative
Qualitative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

PERVERT - acronym

A
Practical
Ethical
Reliability
Validity 
Example
Representativeness 
Theoretical
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Operationalising concepts

A

Defining sociological concepts in such a way that they can be studied or measured
Without a definition to guide the research there would be no clear idea of what precisely was under study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Deception

A

If subjects of the research are unaware or misled about its aims then they have been deceived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Anonymity

A

Participants are not identified - encourages open honesty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Sampling frame

A

A list of names which make up a target population

21
Q

Purposive sampling

A

Participants are selected according to the needs of the study. Applicants who do not meet the profile are rejected

22
Q

Opportunity sampling

A

The researcher studies whoever is willing to and available to take part in study (convenient sampling)

23
Q

Gate keeper

A

Someone with trust and respect of the group who can ease the introduction of researcher - allows access to group

24
Q

Access

A

Before information can be collected the researcher needs to contact the group they wish to study

25
Pilot study
A small scale trial run before the main study to iron out any problems with wording / questions / interviewer technique
26
Representative
A sample is representative if it shares the same characteristics as the population under study which means results might enable generalisations about a wider population - positivists
27
Systematic sampling
Every nth person is chosen from a sampling frame Strength : used for very large samples, it provides the best chance of an unbiased representative sample Weakness : in some situations using a system to select the participants can make the sample biased eg 10th person may be male
28
Stratified sampling
A random sample is taken from particular social categories eg age gender race etc which make up population being studied. Strength - deliberate effort is made to make the sampling representative of target population Weakness - it can be time consuming as the sub-categories to be identified and participants calculated
29
Quota sampling
Mainly used for market researchers in the street eg the may stop and interview a certain number of people eg housewives ages 25-40 y/o Strength - deliberate effort is made to make sample representative of target population Weakness - it can be time consuming as the subcategories have to be identified and proportions calculated. There might be bias in the sample making it unrepresentative because researchers just ask people until they have enough
30
Opportunity sampling
Strength - quick convenient and economical. A most common type of sampling in practice Weakness- very unrepresentative sample, often biased by researcher who will likely chose people who are ‘helpful’
31
Snowball sampling
Strength - a useful way of finding participants with a certain attribute (eg. They are a member of a cult or a drug user who might not wish to be found otherwise) Weakness - can be very biased, people with more friends are more likely to be selected as participants. Some people might not want to be ‘found’ by sociologists
32
How many an interviewer affect research
Social characteristics - CAGE Personal characteristics- body language, tone of voice, style of dress, appearance Status differences Leading questions
33
Strengths of focus groups
Lots of information quickly (cheaper) Group dynamics helps respondents relax/open up More natural behaviour than a private interview (validity) Can observe group interactions
34
Strengths of unstructured interviews
``` High response rate Can build a rapport with the respondent Free flowing and more relaxed Explore new ideas (less restricted) High in validity Can probe for details ```
35
Strengths of structured interviews
``` High response rate Quick to complete High in reliability (closed standardised Qs) Data easy to quantify Lessens interviews bias Useful in finding factual data ```
36
Strengths of semi structured interviews
Can build a rapport with respondent more easily than structured interviews Flexible but still structured to some extent (keeps focus) Increases both reliability and validity (open and closed Qs) Helps find balance between objectivity and subjectivity High response rate
37
Weaknesses of unstructured interviews
No structure go off point less reliable Small scale unrepresentative Difficult to quantify qualitative responses Interviewed needs to be highly skilled Time consuming Interviewer bias - leading Qs socially acceptable responses CAGE of interviewer Highly subjective (value - laden)
38
Weaknesses of semi structured interviews
``` Difficult to compare and quantify 2 types of data (non compatible) Time consuming compared to structured Still restricts responses Never fully reliable or valid Still chance of interviewer bias ```
39
Weaknesses of focus groups
Difficult to analyse results Difficult to build individual rapport Each focus group is so unique so results unreliable Small sample so unrepresentative Group dynamics means respondents might blend in or exaggerate / lie or dominate or conform = invalid
40
Weaknesses of structured interviews
``` Interview schedule is restrictive Lack of probing means lack of detail Lacks validity Still a chance of interviewer bias Imposition problem (researcher decided the Qs and responses) ```
41
The Hawthorne effect
This is when people behave differently when they know they are being studied. There by undermining the validity of the study
42
Observational research
Covert - undercover researcher Overt - open honest researcher ``` Issues : Joining group / access Recording Info Maintaining objectivity Ethical concerns Grounded theory / hypothesis formation ```
43
Strengths of covert participation observation
Enables sociologists to study otherwise hard to reach groups. Detailed qualitative data can be obtained The data records what actually happens, does not rely on respondents answering questions honestly.
44
Weaknesses of covert participant observation
Researcher has to rely on memory of events who said what, accuracy ? Biased? Practical problem of gaining access to group Have to be careful not to draw too much attention have to gain trust Significant ethical issues - consent - deception Issue of safety if involved in illegal behaviour
45
Strengths of overt participation observation
The ethical issues of deception and obtaining consent are resolved The researcher can ask questions openly without fear of giving the game away Record making and note taking is easier making data more accurate
46
Weaknesses of overt observation
The Hawthorne effect is more likely to occur if group is aware of presence and purpose of researcher The question of how far the researcher should become involved especially in deviant activities remain
47
Overt non participant observation strengths
Easier to make a record of what is happening Ethical issues of deception and consent resolved Researchers can ask questions openly Allows collection of quantitative data as well as qualitative data Researcher is not likely to be involved in behaving illegally
48
Overt non participation observation weaknesses
In every day life we do it expect those we are with to be taking notes or recording events. Affects usefulness of research - Hawthorne effect By remaining on the edge researchers are not fully experiencing the groups life - could undermine research