Research Methods Flashcards
Type 1 and type 2 error
-1. False positive. Rejecting null hypothesis when possibility that results due to chance, uses lenient significant level of 0.10
2. False negative - accepts null hypothesis when possibility results were significant , uses strict significant level 0.01
Difference between null and alternate hypothesis
- null hypothesis suggests no causal relationship between IV and DV
- alternate suggests there is
How to reduce type 1 error
- can decide to use 0.01 level of significance, however increases likelihood of type 2
Opposite for type 2. Can use 0.5 level of significance
Converting ordinal data to nominal
- seperate categories are created
- e.g fast/slow reaction, intelligent/unintelligent. Highest ranked half of pp assigned to one category, other half categoried to other
When to use bar chat, scatter Graph and histogram
Bar chart- categorical data
Scatter graph- histogram
Sattergraph -relationship
Advantages of quantitative data
- objective measure, reduced likelihood of bias increasing scientific credibility
-descriptive statistics allows quantitative data to be summarised and displayed on graphs, charts and tables - more reliable , higher repeating
Disadvantages of quantitative data
- data lacks depth and detail
- can only focus on behaviour that can be mathematically measured
Advantages of qualitative data
- rich in detail as more info can be collected, use of open ended does not limit responses
- higher validity
Disadvantage of quantitative data
- open for interpretation can lead to potential bias
- extensive range of data can be challenging to summarise
- less reliability
Advantage and disadvantage of primary data
- increased validity as researcher can control data collection process carefully
- collecting original data from participants time consuming, expensive e.g paying pp for time, setting up experiment, materials
Advantage and disadvantages of secondary data
adv- data already exists and analysed, less time consuming and costs involved
Dis- decreases validity as data not collected to answer research question directly.
Decreases validity as researcher has no role in data collection process therefore cannot ensure free from bias
What is meta analysis
- process collecting and combines result of range of previously published studies, data collected compared and reviewed together.
-Advantages- looks at overall pattern of results across multiple studies, small number of studies affected by bias or lack of control will not change overall pattern of results, more trustworthy than individual results
X- all weakness of secondary data