research methods Flashcards
what are extraneous variables? (research methods)
- any variable (not IV) that may affect the DV if it is not controlled
- do not vary systematically with the IV
- e.g. temperature
what are confounding variables? (research methods)
- a kind of EV that vary systematically with the IV
- researchers can’t tell if change in DV is due to the IV or other CVs
what is a lab experiment? (research methods)
- an experiment that takes place in a controlled environment where the researcher manipulates the IV & records the effect on the DV
- strict control of extraneous variables is maintained
outline 2 strengths to lab experiments (research methods)
- have high control over CVs & EVs, which means that the researcher can ensure that any effect on the DV is most likely due to manipulating the IV
- this creates high internal validity & means demonstrating cause & effect is more certain
- replication is more possible than in other types of experiment due to high control
- ensures that new extraneous variables aren’t introduced when repeating an experiment
- replication is important to see if results from studies are valid or if they are a one time occurrence
outline 2 weaknesses of lab experiments (research methods)
- may lack generalisability as lab environments can be artificial & not true to everyday life
- in an unfamiliar context, Ps may act in unusual ways so their behaviour can’t be generalised beyond the research setting (low external validity)
- Ps are also usually aware that they are being tested, which may lead to demand characteristics
- tasks Ps are asked to carry out may not represent everyday experience
- this causes low mundane realism
why is replication of experiments important? (research methods)
- to test if findings from studies are valid or if they are a one time occurrence
what is a field experiment? (research methods)
- an experiment that takes place in a natural setting within which the researcher manipulates the IV & records the effect on the DV
what are the strengths & weaknesses to field experiments? (research methods)
- have higher mundane realism than lab experiments as the environment is more natural
- may produce behaviour that is more valid & authentic, especially as Ps may be unaware they are being studied (high external validity)
- increased realism due to loss of control of CVs & EVs
- means cause & effect between IV & DV may be more difficult to establish
- precise replication is often not possible
- important ethical issues
- if Ps are unaware they are being studied they can’t consent to being studied
- this research may be classified as an invasion of their privacy
what is a natural experiment? (research methods)
- an experiment where the change in IV is not brought about by the researcher
- researcher measures the effect on a DV they have decided on
- researcher has no influence over the experiment
- carried out in natural conditions
outline 2 strengths of natural experiments (research methods)
- provide opportunities for research that may not have otherwise been undertaken for ethical reasons
- often have high external validity as they involve the study of real world issues & problems as they happen
outline 2 weaknesses of natural experiments (research methods)
- naturally occurring events may only happen very rarely, reducing the opportunities for research
- this may also limit the ability to generalise findings to similar situations
- Ps may not be randomly allocated to experimental conditions (only applies when there is an independent groups design)
- this means that they researcher may be less sure if the IV impacted the DV
- such research may be conducted in a lab & therefore may lack realism & demand characteristics may be an issue
what is a quasi-experiment? (research methods)
- a study that is almost an experiment but lacks key parts
- the IV has not been established by anyone (the researcher or any other person)
- variables (e.g.) age just exist
- is not an experiment
outline the strengths & weaknesses of quasi-experiments (research methods)
- are often carried out under controlled conditions & therefore can be easily replicated
- has control over EVs
- can’t randomly allocate Ps to conditions & therefore there may be CVs
- the IV is not deliberately changed by the researcher so we can’t be sure the IV has caused any observed change
Outline the 3 types of correlation (research methods)
- positive = as one co-variable increases, so does the other
- negative = as one co-variable increases, the other decreases
- no correlation = when there is no relationship between co-variables
outline 2 strengths of using correlations (research methods)
- provide a precise & quantifiable measure of how variables are related
- this may suggest ideas for possible future research if variables are strongly related
- are often used as a starting point to assess possible patterns between variables before researchers commit to an experimental study
- this can help to preserve time & resources
- quick & economical to carry out
- there is no need for a controlled environment & no manipulation of variables is required
- data collected by others (secondary data) can be used
- this means that correlations are less time consuming than experiments
outline 2 weaknesses of using correlations (research methods)
- other untested (intervening/third) variables may be causing the relationship between the co variables
- because of this, correlations can be misused/misinterpreted
- relationships between variables are sometimes presented as casual when they aren’t (especially be the media)
- this may harm people’s views of certain situations
- as a result if the lack of experimental manipulation & control within a correlation, studies can only tell us how variables are related, not why
- can’t demonstrate cause & effect between variables so we don’t know which co-variable is causing the other to change
- establishing the direction of an effect is an issue
what is a target population? (research methods)
- refers to a large group of people that a particular researcher is interested in studying
what is random sampling? (research methods)
- a mathematical technique where all members of a target population have an equal chance of being selected
- first, you need to obtain a list of all members of a target population
- secondly, all the names are assigned a number & then the names are selected using a type of lottery method
evaluate random sampling (research methods)
- is potentially unbiased
- confounding/extraneous variables should be equally divided between the two groups, enhancing internal validity
- difficult & time consuming
- complete list of names from a target population may be hard to obtain
- sample may still be unrepresentative
- selected Ps may refuse to take part (population ends up like a volunteer sample)
what is systematic sampling? (research methods)
- every nth member of a target population is selected
- a sampling frame (list of people in the target population that has been organised into a category) is produced
- may begin from a randomly determined start to reduce bias
- the researcher then works through the sampling frame until the sample is completed
evaluate systematic sampling (research methods)
- sampling method is objective
- once the system for selection has been established, the researcher has no influence over who is chosen (even more so if start is randomly selected)
- method is time consuming
- Ps may refuse to take part, resulting in a volunteer sample
what is stratified sampling? (research methods)
- the characteristics/make up of Ps within a sample are the same as in the target population
- researcher first identified different strata that make up a population
- then the proportions needed for the sample to be representative are worked out
- the Ps that make up each strata are then selected using random sampling
evaluate stratified sampling (research methods)
- produces a representative sample because it is designed to accurately reflect the composition of a population
- this means that generalisation of findings is possible
- avoids researcher bias
- stratification is not perfect
- identified strata can’t reflect all the ways that people are different
- this means that complete representation of the target population is not possible
- is time consuming
what is opportunity sampling? (research methods)
- anyone can be included in the sample
- representative samples of a target population are usually difficult to obtain, so researchers often select anyone who is available & willing to take part
- researcher takes the chance to ask whoever is around at the time of their study