research methods- experiments Flashcards

1
Q

independant variable

A

this is the variable that changes or is manipulated by the researcher to see if it has an effect on the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

dependant variable

A

this is the variable that the researcher measures to see the effect of the IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

operationalise

A

means to be specific and clear when defining the independent and dependant variable in an experiement so that it is easier to measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why is it important to operationalise

A
  • if it is vague, it wouldnt be possible to repeat the research to check for consistent results
    -increases reliability/ replicability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

aim

A

a general statement of what the researcher intends to investigate, the purpose of the study

(always start with “to investigate”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

hypothesis

A

this is a specific, testable statement in which the researcher predicts what will happen between the variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

directional (one tailed) hypothesis

A

the researcher predicts the direction that they think the results will go in
(the diference they expect between the two conditions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

writing frams for directional (one tailed) hypothesis

A

there will be a significantly higher/faster/more (DV) when participants (1 IV) compared to when (2 IV)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Non- directional (two tailed) hypothesis

A

the researcher doesnt predict the direction that they think the results will go in but say “there will be a difference”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

writing frame for Non- directional (two tailed) hypothesis

A

there will be a significant difference in (DV) when participants (1 IV) compared to when participants (2 IV)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Null hypothesis

A

states that the results will be becuase of chance and not the independent variable that the researcher changed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Null hypothesis writing frame

A

there will no significant diference in (DV) between (1 IV) and (2 IV)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

extraneous variables

A

unwanted extra variable other than the IV that could have an effect on the DV- would lower the interal validity of the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

confounding variables

A

this is when an extraneous variable is not controlled for and does effect the DV and so becomes a confounding variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

describe Lab Experiement

A
  • an experiemtent conducted ina lab which is a highly controlled environment where the researcher mnipulates the independent variable and measures the effect on the dependent variable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

strenghts and limitations of a lab experiment

A

+ high control over extraneous variables

+ high in reliability

  • ecological validity
  • prone to demand characteristics
17
Q

describe Field experiement

A

An experiement which takes place in a natural environment where the researcher manipulates the independent variable and measures the effect on the dependent variable

18
Q

strenght and limitation of Field Experiment

A

+ less prone to demand characteristics

+ low in reliability

  • low in reliablity
  • ethical issues lack of informed consent