research methods- statistics Flashcards

(51 cards)

1
Q

quantitative data

A

data expressed nnumerically. this data can be gained from individual scores in experiements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

evaluation of quantitative data

A

+ simple to analyze
- lacks depth and meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

qualitative data

A

data expressed in words or descriptive data. in form of written description of thought, feelingsand opinions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

qualitative data evaluation

A

+ rich detail and depth
- harder to analyse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

descrete data

A

info that can be categorised into groups, the data can only appear in one category. cant be sub-divided

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

continuous data

A

data that can be measured using scientific tools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

nominal

A

data in the form of categories
something you can count
subjective at time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

ordinal

A

data in order/ ranked
doesnt have equal intervals
based on subjective opinions
doesnt use raw data so isnt very precise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

interval

A

data that is a standard/universal/offical measurement
based on objective meaures
interval is based on numerical scales that include units of equal precisely defined size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

primary data

A

data gathered first hand/ directly from participants. specific to the aims of the study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

primary data evaluation

A

+ specifically for the aim
- involves time and effort to obtain the data as well as analyse the findings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

secondary data

A

has previously been collected by a third party, no specific to the aims of the study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

secondary data evaluation

A

+ requires minimal effort
- may be poor quality or have inaccuracy or out of date information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

meta analysis

A

a form of research methods that use secondary data as it gains data from a large number of studies, which hae been investigted the same research questions and methods of research. then it combies the information to make conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

meta analysis evaluations

A

+ increases generalisablitity
- prone to publication bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

content analysis

A

method of analysing qualitative data by changing large amounts of qualitative data into quantitative data. this si doen by codes that can be counted so that we can make a graph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

when is it appropriate to use content analysis

A

the data () being analysed is qualitative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what is meant by coding

A

coding is the initial process of a content analysis where qualitative data is placed into meaningful categories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

how is content analysis carried out

A

: read/ view video or trandscript
: create codes (give example)
: re-read and tally everytime each code appears
: present the quantitative data in graph/ table

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

thematic analysis

A

method of analysing qualitative data by identifying emergent themes enabling us to present the data in qualitative format

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

how is thematic analysis carried out

22
Q

thematic analysis evaluation

A

+ easy to assess the reliability of findings because others can access the material and use codes
- research bais

23
Q

ways to assess reliability of content analysis

A

: test re-test
: inter-rater reliability

24
Q

test re-test

A

: does content analysis
: same researcher repeats the content analysis on the same data
: compare results
:correlate using stats test
: strong posistive of 0.8+ shows high reliability

25
inter-rater reliability
: two rates read through data seperately : create codes together : both read the exact same content but record sperately : compare tallies : correlate using appropriate stats test : strong positive correlation shs high reliability
26
ways to improve reliability of content analysis
: operationalise
27
operationalise
means t be speific and clear when defining coding categories to make the codes more measurable
28
why is it important to operationalise
if coding categories are vague then it wouldnt be possible to repeat the research to check for consistent results increases reliability, other researchers can repeat and check for consistent results
29
face validity
psychologist in the same field seeing if a coding category looks like it measures what it claims to measure at firs sight/ face value. if they say yes the content analysis is valid
30
concurrent validity
comparing the results of a new content analysis with results from another similar pre-existing content analysis which has already been astablished for its validity. if the results from both are similar we can assume the test is valid. correlation of coding recordings gained from an appropriate stats test should be more that 0.8
31
ways to improve the validity of content analysis
operationalise categories train researchers in how to use the coding categories
32
what is meant by measures of central tendency and eg.'s
the general term for any measure of average value in a set of data mode,median, mean
33
mode and what data it is used with
most common or popular number in set of scores and there can be more than one mode in data set used with nominal data
34
mode evaluations
+ easy to calculate + less prone to distortion by extreme values - doesnt take into account all data so may be less accurate
35
median and the date used with
middle score in a list of ranked-ordered scores. used with ordinal data
36
median evaluation
+ easy to calculate + not efffected by extreme values - not as sensitive as mean as doesnt use all data
37
mean and the data it is used with
all scores added up and divided by the total number of scores used with interval data
38
evaluation of mean
+ most accurate and sensitive measure - affected by extreme scores
39
measures of dispersion
this is based on the spread of scores, how far scores vary from the mean or average eg. range, standard deviation,
40
range and the data used with it
the spread of data from the smallest to largest calculated by substracting the lowest value from the highest value and adding 1 used for ordinal data
41
range evaluations
+ easy and quick to calculate - can be distorted by extreme
42
standard deviation and the data used with it
measure of spread around mean higher the SD the more the spread larger the number the less consisten and more individual differences used with interval data
43
standard deviation
+ most precise/ sensitive measure + less easily distorted by extreme value - more complicated and time consuming
44
writing frame for interpretating the mean
the mean for condition ------- is ------ which is (higher/ lower) than the mean for condition ------ which is ------ therefore----- (effective or not) for standard deviation change effective to consistent
45
normal distribution
curve is symmetrical extends outward but never touches 0 mean, median mode is around the same
46
skewed distribution
not symmetrical- data clusered at one end positive skew: most of data towards the left negative skew: most of data is concentrated on the right
47
bar charts
: display discrete data : used when data is divided into categories- they will be words : frequency as y axis : used to compare conditions bars dont touch
48
histograms
: display continuous data or data where each participant has an individual score : represent frequences : scores with equal intervals on x-axis : frequency on y-axis : bars should always touch each other
49
scattergram/ scattergraph
used to display a relationship between wo co-variables represent corelation each plot on the graph represents 1 ppt but 2 scores
50
a statistical test tells us which hypothesis is most likely to be true or most probable
accepted significance level in psychology is less than 5%. this means there is less than 5% probability that the results occurred by chance/ extraneous variables so more than 95% was because of the iv
51
statistical testing or inferential testing
when we carry out these tests it gives us a score which is a value for the research. this is called the calculated or observed value you then compare the calculated value to a critical value. the critical value decides whether or not the calculated value is significant if the calculated value is signifacant we can accept our alternative hypothesis