Research Methods Final Flashcards
(77 cards)
What creates false positives
Incentives to publish - academics are rewarded for publishing which can motivate people to take shortcuts
Questionable research practices - slightly adjusting design, analysis, and reporting to produce p value above .05
Specific questionable practices
Measure the dependent variable in multiple ways
Gradually add more observations
Add and drop covariates
Add or drop experimental conditions
Combining these QRP’s gives you a 61% chance of getting p over 0.05 for an effect that isn’t real
File drawer problem
Studies showing null effects often wind up in a file drawer instead of in a journal
The published literature is thus heavily biased towards studies that “worked” (publication bias)
What can help false positives
Pre Registration: mitigates QRP’s: reporting exactly how you will conduct your experiment beforehand so you can be fact checked when you go to publish their results
Open materials and data: reader can see and test all dependent variables, test analyses with and without covariates, see and test all experimental conditions
Make unsuccessful studies searchable
Journals publishing null results: studies that answer important questions no matter the result are worth publishing
Credibility revolution
The movement has expanded to many other ways we can improve our research practices
Credibility is not just about statistical results
What is a construct
variables that cannot be observed directly
Defining variables
Conceptually vs operationally
Must conceptually define constructs
Must operationally define constructs
Every variable in study must be operationalized, must operationalize based on conceptual definition
Types of measurement
Self-report,
Behavioral: could be naturally occurring or lab induced
Physiological: assessment of bodily states (fmri, heart rate, pet)
How to choose which type of measurement to use
Previous research; how was this variable measured in previous studies
theory
methodological advances: new technology means new ways to measure
Feasibility: resource limitation like time and money may affect your choices
Test-retest reliability
same test given twice with some time in between, good for stable qualities like personality, not good for temporary states like mood
Parallel forms reliability
different forms of the same test used
Internal consistency
split half correlation ( top half questionnaire is compared to bottom half, Chronbach’s Alpha tests how items are intercorrelated
True score
the real score on the variable
Obtained
the score measures give
Measurement error
difference between true score and obtained score
Face validity
does measurement look like it measures the thing it’s meant to measure?
Survey research
uses self report
Tries to obtain generalizable samples - ideally random and large
Interviews
Structured or unstructured
Costly
Interviewer bias
Social desirability concerns
Phone surveys
Structured or unstructured
Used to be easy to get random samples, now no one picks up their phone
Cheaper
Less social desirability
Questionnaires
Paper or electronic
Cheapest
Fewest social desirability concerns
Survey advantages
Can access non-observable variables as well as variables you cannot ethically or practically manipulate
Demographic info
Attitudes and benefits
Past behaviour
Current behaviour that cannot be observed
Motivation and emotion
Personality traits
Easy to administer
Quick and easy way to gather lots of information that requires few resources
Survey disadvantages
Accuracy may be low
Participants may lack insight
May forget previous behaviour
May respond in socially desirable way
Not manipulating IV, thus cannot demonstrate causation
True of all correlation / non experimental research
Good survey
BRUSO
Is brief - avoid long sentences and jargon
Relevant - avoid temptation to include extra items that stray from question - avoid personal/ nosy questions
Unambiguous - don’t be vague or use negative wording
Specific - avoid questions with multiple ideas packed in
Objective - questions shouldn’t have emotionally charged words
The hidden curriculum
norms and opportunities within academic culture that are rarely explicitly taught