research methods pt 2 Flashcards
Aims and hypotheses, sampling, pilot studies, experimental designs, observational design, questionnaire construction, variables control, demand characteristics and investigator effects etc
Pilot study
Small scale trial run of a research study. They take place before the full-scale research project. Usually will take a smaller amount of participants who can be questioned afterwards about their experiences.
Aims of the pilot study
- Check that the research works
- No extraneous variables
- Any problems can be rectified before running the full scale study
- E.g. instructions and questions clarified, materials refined and improved, timings can be changed.
Population
A large group of individuals who share specific characteristics that a researcher is interested in studying. It doesn’t refer to the general population but the ‘target population’ as it refers to a particular subset of the population.
Sample
A smaller group of people taken from a larger population the researcher is interested in studying.
Bias
This refers to under-representing or over-representing certain groups within the sample. For example, too many younger people or too few males.
Generalisation
The extent to which findings from a specific sample can be applied to the population. This is made possible if the sample is representative of the population.
Opportunity sampling
Selecting anyone who is willing and available to take art at the time. E.g. approaching people in the street. This is the most common sampling technique used in psychological research and often results in students being used since most research takes place within universities.
Advantage of opportunity sampling: Quick, convenient and economical
This means that it doesn’t require the level of planning and preparation that many other sampling methods require.
For example, a study into stress levels during shopping can simply involve a researcher approaching shoppers at a shopping centre rather than having to pre-identify participants.
This is positive as it leads to less delays in the research process and less money spent.
Disadvantage of opportunity sampling: can be biased and unrepresentative
This means that the participants that happen to be available at the time of the study may not represent everyone in the target population.
For example, if a study is conducted in the middle of the working day, the sample my only include people who work reduced hours or the unemployed.
researchers may avoid people they do not like the look of (researcher bias) This is problematic because it means the sample may be biased and cannot be generalised to everyone, lowering ecological validity.
Volunteer (self-selected) sampling
Individuals who have put themselves forward. The researcher may place adverts in newspapers or uni noticeboards.
Advantage of VOLUNTEER SAMPLING: QUICK, CONVENIENT AND ECONOMICAL:
This means that it doesn’t require the level of planning and prep that many other sampling methods require to identify participants. For example, a researcher studying memory can advertise for participants and the participant should present themselves.
This is positive as there are less delays in the research process and less money spend.
DISADVANTAGE OF VOLUNTEER SAMPLING:
CAN BE BIASED AND UNREPRESENTATIVE:
This means that volunteers tend to be a certain type of person.
For example, they tend to be more confident and motivated than most.
This is problematic as it means the sample may be biased (known as ‘volunteer bias’) and the findings and cannot be generalised to everyone, lowering ecological validity.1
Systematic sampling
selecting every nth member of the target population. This involves obtaining a list of names of every one in the target population (e.g school register or database of members) organised in some way (eg alphabetical) and choosing for example every 5th name.
ADVANTAGE OF SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING:
AVOIDS RESEARCHER BIAS:
This means the researcher has no influence over who is chosen as it simply who happens to be in certain positions in a list that are selected.
For example, picking whoever happens to be in every 5th position on an alphabetical list prevents them from only choosing people they think will help support their hypothesis.
This is positive as the research is less biased, more objective and less open to abuse or researcher influence.
DISADVANTAGE OF SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING:
NOT GUARANTEED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE:
This means that every nth name on a list could, by chance, lead to only a certain type of person being selected. For example, every nth name could be male even though there are just as many females on the list. Furthermore, there is still an element of bias involved as not everyone has an equal chance of being selected as people with names at the start of a register, for example, are unlikely to be selected. This is a problem as the findings cannot be generalised to everyone, lowering ecological validity.
Random sampling
Where everyone in the target population has an equal chance of being selected. There must be a list of everyone in the target population. All names are assigned a number, then the sample is generated through a lottery method (eg random number generator/ names out of a hat)
ADVANTAGE OF RANDOM SAMPLING:
AVOIDS RESEARCHER BIAS:
This means that the researcher has no influence over who is being selected.
For example, picking names from a hat prevents them from only choosing people they think will help support their hypothesis.
This is positive because random samples are less biased, more objective and less open to abuse or researcher influence.
DISADVANTAGE OF RANDOM SAMPLING:
NOT GUARANTEED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE:
This means that drawing names randomly from a hat could still, by chance, lead to only a certain type of person being selected. For example, every name drawn could be male even though there are just as many females in the hat. This is a problem as the findings cannot be generalised to everyone, lowering ecological validity.
Stratified sampling
A sample that reflects the proportions of people in different sub groups according to their frequency in the population. (eg 15% of the population are from a particular age group then 15% of the sample should be from that age group.
The sub groups need to be identified then the proportions need to be worked out. then the participants from each sub group are chosen randomly. putting all the names of males in one hat and females in the other.