Research Skills Part 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Name 3 ways to deal with outliers

A
  1. Data transformation (e.g. logs)
  2. Winsorizing
  3. Truncating = deleting extreme observations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Important notes on Event Date

A
  1. Firms may announce their events at strategic moments, e.g., when the stock price is high > shows up in abnormal returns before the announcement.
  2. Stock prices may react before the event due to information leakage
  3. Firms may announce their events jointly with other announcements > confounding events
  4. But there can also be a delay in stock price reaction due to illiquid markets, more time needed to process information, limits to arbitrage, misclassified timezones.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Name 3 ways to compute the expected returns

A
  1. Constant-mean-market model = historical average return
  2. Market-adjusted-return model = market return as proxy for normal return
  3. Market model

The choice of estimation window is a tradeoff between precision and timeliness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Name the assumptions when calculating the S.E. of the CAR

A
  1. It assumes homoskedasticity per firm and no cross-correlations
  2. It assumes that volatility is not affected by the event
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Give the formula for t-statistic

A

t-stat = (mean - X) / S.E.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Give the t-stat for CAR

A

t-stat (CAR) = avgCAR / SQRT(var(avgCAR))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Give the formula for S.E.

A

S.E. = SD / SQRT(N)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Further economic insight can be gained by relating CARs to firm characteristics, even when mean stock price effect is zero. How?

A

Run cross-sectional regression of CARs on characteristics, such as firm size, industry, Tobin’s Q.

Note, characteristics must be known before the announcements.

Such a regression is important to:
- understand the sources of abnormal returns
- see how abnormal returns can be different across alternative types of firms
- see how abnormal returns can depend upon the characteristics of the event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Name 5 limitations / drawbacks of event studies

A
  1. We assume that the benchmark model is correct. Otherwise AR will be incorrect
  2. We assume that event windows of firms do not overlap. Otherwise there’s EVENT CLUSTERING and the observations are not independent across securities. The var(avgCAR) is underestimated. Solution = form portfolios.
  3. We assume that a firm’s beta remains constant after the announcement
  4. Choice of event window and estimation window is a bit arbitrary
  5. W assume abnormal returns to follow a normal distribution > use non-parametric tests
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Things to worry about in event studies…

A
  1. Anticipated events > leakage or announcement timing
  2. Confounding effects
  3. Event day uncertainty
  4. Thin or non-synchronous trading
  5. Event-induced variance > vola of returns is assumed the same in event and non-event periods
  6. Clustering / cross-sectional dependence > if event windows overlap, t-tests may reject too often, because ARs exhibit small correlations across securities.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why can’t we use CARs in long-horizon event studies? Propose an alternative.

A

The CAR is not the abnormal long-run return of buy-and-hold strategies, because it ignores the cumulative effect of returns. Instead, use buy-and-hold abnormal returns (BHARs).

BHAR is the buy-and-hold return of the event firm minus the buy-and-hold return on a benchmark portfolio.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What’s best to use as a ‘benchmark’ in long-horizon event studies?

A

Instead of simple benchmark model, it is more common to use the return on characteristics-matched portfolio as benchmark. Typical characteristics are size, B/M ratio, leverage, industry…

Pro: no need to estimate factor loadings
Con: firms with similar characteristics can still be different

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Issues with long-horizon event studies

A
  1. Results of long-horizon event studies critically depend on model for expected return, because errors are cumulated. This is not really the case for short-horizon event studies, since the discrepancy is negligible.
  2. Finite-sample test-statistics have lots of problems:
    - Cross-correlation (many event windows overlap in time due to long event windows, causing cross-correlation)
    - Skewness (long run return of stock is positively skewed due to compounding, long run return of (market) portfolio is not)
    »> these issues can lead to large biases in t-statistics!!!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the most interesting time window in an event study?

A

The event window

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why does an event study focus on abnormal returns?

A

To control for overall market movements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why do we often need a cross-sectional analysis in an event study?

A

Because it helps to understand the sources of the abnormal returns

Because it helps to understand how abnormal returns vary across firms

Because it helps to understand how abnormal returns depend upon characteristics of the event

Because aggregate abnormal returns may be zero, despite clear announcement effects