Rest Of SocPsych Flashcards

(84 cards)

1
Q

What predicts attraction?

A
  • Proximity Effect
  • Mere Exposure
  • Reciprocal Liking
  • Similarity
  • Physical attractiveness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Proximity Effect

A

Physical distance & frequency of seeing each other affects chances of bring attracted to them; Morelin & Beach (1992)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

‘Mere Exposure’ Effect

A

The finding that the more exposure we have to a stimulus, the more apt we are to like it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reciprocal Liking

A

Just knowing that a person likes us fuels our attraction to that individual. Liking is so powerful that it can even make up for the absence of similarity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Similarity & Relationships

A

If two people have similar tastes across many things (opinions, personality, interest, etc.), the more likely they are to get along; (ChristaKis Fowler, 2014) Friends shared more dna traits with each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Physical Attractiveness

A

Faces (not body types) tend to be ranked similarly cross-culturally; Physical attractiveness was the #1 factor of someone wanting to see another again

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Attractive Female Facial Features

A

Small nose, large smile, high cheekbone, small chin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Familiarity in Attractiveness

A

We tend to prefer faces that resemble our own

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Assumptions about Attractive People

A
  • tend to earn 10-15% more than the latter
  • may have better social skills
  • facial symmetry is cross-cultural as well
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evolution & Mate Selection

A

Evolution: men have more sexual partners than women
- high cost for W, low-cost for M
- W = more selective on partners (& their resources)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Technology & Online Dating

A
  • broadened horizons
  • increased long-distance relationships
  • less stigma around the thought of meeting someone online
  • long-term success rate tends to be lower than face-to-face
  • online profiles may not be accurate (catfishing)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love

A

describes types of love based on three different scales: intimacy, passion, and commitment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ainsworth’s Attachment Styles

A

From observation, Ainsworth concluded that there were three major styles of attachment: secure attachment, ambivalent-insecure attachment, and avoidant-insecure attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Secure attachment

A

characterized by trust, a lack of concern with being abandoned, and the view that one is worthy and well liked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Avoidant Attachment

A

difficulty developing intimate relationships because previous attempts to be intimate have been rebuffed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Anxious/Ambivalent

A

characterized by a concern that others will not reciprocate one’s desire for intimacy, resulting in higher-than-average levels of anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Social Exchange Theory of Relationships

A

To view relationships as a business (cost-benefits system); individual-focused

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Investment Model of Relationships

A

available alternatives and what you think you deserve affect the social exchange theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Equity Theory of Relationships

A

We are happiest when rewards and costs seem equal; “Are both of us putting in equal effort?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Exchange Relationship

A

Common with new relationships; examining the costs and benefits of the relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Communal Relationships

A

Common with long-term relationships; not worried about getting something in return

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

4 Phases of Breakups

A
  1. Intrapersonal (Introspection)
  2. Dyadic
  3. Social
  4. Intrapersonal (Retrospection)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Intrapersonal Phase (Introspection)

A

Beginning to come to terms with yourself about the issue; “I can’t stand this anymore.” “What am I getting out of this?” “Is this working for me?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Dyadic Phase

A

Confronts partner with the issue, and assess what’s next

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Social Phase
Friends and family hear about the breakup, then everyone else hears soon after
26
Intrapersonal Phase (Retrospection)
Getting over it; analyzing what went wrong
27
Prosocial Behavior
Any act with the goal of benefitting another person
28
Altruism
Desire to help another person, even when it comes with a cost
29
Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis
When we feel empathy for another person, we will attempt to help that person for purely altruistic reasons
30
Batson’s perspective on empathy-atruism relationship (1991)
If you don’t feel empathy for another person, you will trigger social exchange theory (cost-benefit) when helping them
31
Evolutionary Psychology Reasons of Why People Help Each Other
- Kin selection - Norms of reciprocity - Group Selection
32
Kin Selection
Helping certain people may help our ‘kin’ survive in some way
33
Norms of Recipocity
Helping each other may improve survival for both parties involved
34
Group Selection
Some argued that people pass on traits that make them more likely to survive and reproduce
35
Altruistic Personality
Personality characteristics that influence chances of engaging in prosocial behavior
36
Gender Differences in Prosocial Behavior
Women more likely to engage in prosocial behavior than men; culture differs nowadays, as more men are being taught to care about other’s well-being
37
Carnegie Hero Fund Commission
Of 7000 awarded with a grand prosocial award, 91% are men; showcases that Men more likely to engage in extreme examples of prosocial behavior (saving ppl out of burning building)
38
Cultural Differences on Prosocial Behavior
Collective more likely to help each other out than individualistic cultures
39
Group Dynamics of Prosocial Behavior
We’re more likely to help ppl in our ‘in-group’ than ppl in our ‘out-group’
40
Mood & Prosocial Behavior
Being in a good mood can encourage prosocial behavior as well; “Feel good, do good.”
41
Finding A Dime (Isen & Levin, 1972)
Only 4% of the people who did not find a dime helped the man pick up his papers, whereas a whopping 84% of the people who found a dime stopped to help.
42
Religion & Prosocial Behavior
religious people are more likely to help than other people are, with an important qualification: if the person in need of help shares their religious beliefs
43
“Feel BAD, do GOOD?”
sadness can also lead to an increase in helping, because when people are sad, they are motivated to engage in activities that make them feel better.
44
Rural vs Urban on Prosocial Behavior
People are less helpful in big cities than in small towns, not because of a difference in values, but because the stress of urban life causes them to keep to themselves.
45
Urban Overload Hypothesis
We are constantly bombarded with stimulation, and to avoid overwhelm, we avoid the stimulation (people)
46
Residential Mobility
When we have long-term residents in our area, we see: - lower crime, - more involved w/ community, - greater concern for reputation
47
Bystander Effect
The more people there are in an emergency, the longer it takes for help to be called (Latane & Darley, 1970)
48
Pluralistic Ignorance
When we assume that everyone else is interpreting a situation in the same way
49
Diffusion of Responsibility
Our sense of responsibility decreases as the number of people increases; More likely to help by requesting by name
50
Cyberspace vs Real Life Interaction on Prosocial Behavior
More likely to get help from others in person than over technology
51
Video Games/Media Influence on Prosocial Behavior
People who played a prosocial game are more likely to help others after that game
52
How Can Prosocial Behavior be Increased?
- Increasing likelihood that bystanders will intervene - Volunteering (more likely to be healthier, happier, and live longer!)
53
Aggression
intentional behavior aimed at doing harm or causing physical or psychological pain to another person
54
Hostile Aggression
having as one’s goal the harming of another
55
Instrumental aggression
harm as a means to some other end; Hurting someone in the process of pursuing another goal
56
Evolutionary View on Aggression
Primarily deals w/ testosterone (correlation w/ aggression & testosterone)
57
Challenge Hypothesis
“Testosterone relates to aggression only when there are opportunities of reproduction.”
58
Dual-Hormone Hypothesis
“(Testosterone & cortisol) dominant-seeking behavior only occurs when we have elevated testosterone and low cortisol levels.”
59
Testosterone on the Brain
Testosterone related to reduced activity in orbital frontal cortex regarding impulsive control and self-regulation
60
Culture & Aggression
There is a great variation in the levels of aggression across cultures; under some conditions, groups have had to become more aggressive, and under other conditions, they have become more peaceful; - collectivist = less aggressive -
61
Cultures of Honor
Men are raised to respond aggressively to perceptions of threat and disrespect, a response that originated in economic conditions
62
Gender & Aggression
Women - indirect forms of aggression (gossip) - more aggressive with ppl they know Men - direct forms of aggression (fighting) - more aggressive w/ strangers
63
Learning to Behave Aggressively
- ‘Bobo Doll’ Experiment - Social-cognitive learning
64
Social-Cognitive Learning Theory
people often learn social behavior, including aggression, through observational learning—observing and imitating others, especially people and institutions they respect
65
The Bobo Doll Experiment
Children learn aggressive behavior through imitation. In this classic study, the experimenter modeled some rather violent treatment of the doll—and the children imitated her perfectly
66
Social Situations & Aggression
- Frustration & aggression - Provocation & reciprocation
67
Frustration & Aggression
Frustration is more likely to produce aggression if one is thwarted on the way to a goal in a manner that is either illegitimate or unexpected.
68
Relative deprivation
The feeling that you have less than what you deserve or less than people similar to you have can lead to frustration and aggressive behavior
69
Provocation & Reciprocity
Individuals frequently aggress to reciprocate the aggressive behavior of others.
70
Violence & Media
Watching violence is associated with an increase in aggressive behavior, especially in children, but not all studies find a relationship
71
Prominent Factors of Aggression & Media
- Norms - Observational Learning - Habituation - Misattribution - Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
72
Societal Norms & Aggression
(Thailand) Framing aggressive behavior as childish may decrease aggressive, wanting to follow society
73
Observational Learning & Aggression
When people see characters behaving violently, it might trigger imitation, providing them with ideas as to how they might go about it.
74
Misattribution & Aggression
Watching violence may put people more in touch with their feelings of anger and make an aggressive response more likely through priming. (Real anger? Or a stressful day?)
75
Habituation & Aggression
Watching a lot of mayhem seems to reduce both our sense of horror about violence and our sympathy for the victims, making it easier for us to live with violence and perhaps easier for us to act aggressively.
76
Self-Fulfilling Prophecy & Agression
If watching a lot of television makes people think the world is a dangerous place, they might be more apt to be hostile to a stranger who approaches them on the street.
77
Using Punishment on Violent Adults
(Bower & Hilgard, 1981). Punishment must follow quickly after the aggression occurred, and it must be unavoidable. In the real world, these conditions are almost never met.
78
Does Punishment reduce behavior?
the use of harsh punishments to reduce aggression usually backfires; it may put a halt to a child’s aggressive behavior in the short term, but children who are physically punished tend to become more aggressive and antisocial over time (Durrant & Ensom, 2012).
79
Catharsis
The notion that “blowing off steam”—by behaving aggressively or watching others do so—relieves built-up anger and aggressive energy and hence reduces the likelihood of further aggressive behavior; doesn’t prove to be very effective
80
Reducing Aggression
- apologizing - buiding empathy - disrupting rejection-rage cycle
81
Apologizing to Reduce Aggression
When both parties apologizing over their part (and genuinely mean it), it can reduced aggression towards each other
82
Building Empathy to Reduce Rage
By building empathy among people, dehumanization decreases and aggressive acts should be difficult to commit. It’s harder to harm a stranger if you have made a personal connection with that person
83
Rejection-Rage Cycle
Social rejection is the most significant risk factor for teenage suicide, despair, and violence.
84
Disrupting the Rejection-Rage Cycle
Changing the atmosphere of schools through awareness, empathy training, and bullying-reduction programs can reduce bullying and improve the lives of the youth.