Restructuring And Distressed M&A Flashcards
(39 cards)
How much do you actually know about what you do in restructuring?
Restructuring bankers advise distressed companies and help them change their capital structure to get out of bankruptcy, avoid it in the first place, or assist with the sale of the company.
What are the 2 different sides to a restructuring deal? Do you know which one we usually advise?
Bankers can advise the debtor (company itself) or the creditors (anyone that has lent the company) money. In one you’re trying to advise the company how to get out of the mess, the other you’re advising the lenders that are trying to take from the company what they can.
Creditors can be multiple parties. There are also operational advisors who help with the actual turnaround.
Research what each company does. Black stone and Lazard advise debtors, Houlihan Lokey advise creditors.
Why are you interested in restructuring besides it being the hot area right now?
You gain a very specialized skill set and the work is actually more technical/interesting than M&A. You also get broader exposure because you get to see both the good and the bad.
How are you going to use your experience in restructuring for your future career goals?
It provides you with specialized skills and more technical understanding, so even if you don’t want to stay in restructuring, you can move to another division and have great technical knowledge.
How would a distressed company select its restructuring bankers?
Restructuring requires extremely specialized knowledge and relationships. There are only a few banks with good practices and they are selected on experience.
Why would a company go bankrupt in the first place?
Common reasons:
- company cannot meet debt obligations/ interest payments
- creditors can accelerate debt payments and force company into bankruptcy.
- an acquisition has gone poorly or a company has just written down its assets steeply and needs extra capital
- there is a liquidity crunch and the company can not afford to pay its vendors or suppliers
What options are available to a distressed company that can’t meet its obligations?
- refinance and obtain fresh debt/equity
- sell the company
- restructure its financial obligations to lower interest payments/ debt repayments, or issue debt with PIK interest to reduce the cash interest expense
- file for bankruptcy and use that opportunity to obtain additional financing, restructure its obligations, and be freed of onerous contracts.
What are the advantages of each option to a distressed company that can’t meet its debt obligations?
- refinance- advantages: least disruptive and would help revive confidence; disadvantages: difficult to attract investors to a company on the verge of going bankrupt
- sale - advantages: shareholders get some value and creditors are less infuriated; disadvantages: unlikely to obtain a good valuation in a distressed sale.
- restructuring- advantages: could resolve problems quickly without 3rd party. Disadvantages: lenders often resistant to increase exposure to the company.
- bankruptcy- advantages: could be best way to negotiate with lenders, reduce obligations, and get more financing. Disadvantages: significant business disruptions and lack of confidence. Equity investors lose all their money.
What strategies do creditors have available to recover their capital in a destressed situation?
- lend additional capital/ grant equity.
- conditional financing
- sale- force company to sell
- foreclosure - force a bankruptcy filing
How are restructuring deals different from other types of transactions?
More complex, more parties involved, require more technical skills, and have to follow bankruptcy legal code, also multiple negotiations going on, not just two sides negotiating.
What’s the difference between chapter 7 and chapter 11 bankruptcy?
Chapter 7 = liquidation bankruptcy, where the company is past the point of no return and must sell off its assets.
Chapter 11 = a reorganization, where changes are made to the terms of its debt and renegotiates its interest payments.
What is debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing and how is it used with distressed companies?
It is money borrowed by a distressed company that has repayment priority over all others and therefore is considered safer. This theoretically should help the company emerge from bankruptcy.
How would you adjust the 3 financial statements for a distressed company when you’re doing valuation or modeling work?
And would those adjustments differ between private and public companies?
Most common adjustments:
- adjust COGs for higher vendor costs
- add back non-recurring legal/ other fees associated with restructuring
- add back excess lease expenses and excess salaries to operating income
- working capital needs adjusted for receivables unlikely to turn into cash, overvalued inventory, and insufficient payables
- capex spending is often off
Most of the above stays the same except excess salaries for public companies
If the market value of a distressed company’s debt is greater than its assets, what happens to its equity?
Shareholders equity goes negative.
A company’s equity market cap (shares outstanding*price) would remain positive though since it can never be negative.
In a bankruptcy, what is the order of claims on a company’s assets?
- DIP lenders
- Secured creditors
- Unsecured creditors
- Subordinated debt investors
- Mezzanine investors
- Shareholders
How do you measure the cost of debt for a company if it is too distressed to issue additional debt?
You’d look at the yields of bonds or spreads of credit default swaps of comparable companies.
How would valuation change for a distressed company?
- you use the same methodologies most of the time
- except you look more at the lower range of multiples
- you also use lower projections for DCF and anything else needing projecting
- you should pay more attention to revenue multiples if the company is EBIT/EBITDA negative
- you look at a liquidation valuation under the assumption the assets will be sold off to pay obligations
- you sometimes also look at valuations on both an assets-only and current-liabilities assumes basis
How would a DCF analysis be different in a distressed scenario?
Even more of the value would come from the terminal value since you normally assume a few years of cash flow negative turnaround.
Let’s say a distressed company approaches you and wants to hire your bank to sell it in a distressed sale – how would the M&A process be different than it would for a healthy company?
- Timing is often quick since the company needs to sell or else they’ll go bankrupt.
- Sometimes you’ll produce fewer “upfront” marketing materials (Information
Memoranda, Management Presentations, etc.) in the interest of speed. - Creditors often initiate the process rather than the company itself.
- Unlike normal M&A deals, distressed sales can’t “fail” – they result in a sale, a
bankruptcy or sometimes a restructuring.
Normally in a sell-side M&A process, you always want to have multiple bidders to increase competition. Is there any reason they’d be especially important in a distressed sale?
Yes – in a distressed sale you have almost no negotiating leverage because you represent a company that’s about to die. The only real way to improve price for your client is to have multiple bidders.
The 2 basic ways you can buy a company are through a stock purchase and an asset purchase. What’s the difference, and what would a buyer in a distressed sale prefer? What about the seller?
In a stock purchase, you acquire 100% of a company’s shares as well as all its assets and liabilities (on and off-balance sheet). In an asset purchase, you acquire only certain assets of a company and assume only certain liabilities – so you can pick and choose exactly what you’re getting.Companies typically use asset purchases for divestitures, distressed M&A, and smaller private companies; anything large, public, and healthy generally needs to be acquired via a stock purchase.
A buyer almost always prefers an asset purchase so it can avoid assumption of unknown liabilities (there are also tax advantages for the buyer).
A (distressed) seller almost always prefers a stock purchase so it can be rid of all its liabilities and because it gets taxed more heavily when selling assets vs. selling the entire business.
Sometimes a distressed sale does not end in a conventional stock/asset purchase – what are some other possible outcomes?
Other possible outcomes:
• Foreclosure (either official or unofficial)
• General assignment (faster alternative to bankruptcy)
• Section 363 asset sale (a faster, less risky version of a normal asset sale)
• Chapter 11 bankruptcy
• Chapter 7 bankruptcy
Normally M&A processes are kept confidential – is there any reason why a distressed company would want to announce the involvement of a banker in a sale process?
This happens even outside distressed sales – generally the company does it if they want more bids / want to increase competition and drive a higher purchase price.
Are shareholders likely to receive any compensation in a distressed sale or bankruptcy?
Technically, the answer is “it depends” but practically speaking most of the time the answer is “no.”
If a company is truly distressed, the value of its debts and obligations most likely exceed the value of its assets – so equity investors rarely get much out of a bankruptcy or distressed sale, especially when it ends in liquidation.