review - supreme court cases Flashcards

1
Q

Marbury v. Madison (1803, Marshall)

A

The court established the principle of judicial review, allowing them to judge the constitutionality of federal laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fletcher v. Peck (1810, Marshall)

A

Stemmed from Yazoo land cases of 1803, upheld the sanctity of contracts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819, Marshall)

A

The court ruled that states cannot tax the federal government (Bank of the US); Marshall said “the power to tax is the power to destroy,” confirmed constitutionality of Bank of the United States.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819, Marshall)

A

New Hampshire attempted to take over Dartmouth College by revising its colonial charter. Court ruled that charter was protected under contract clause of US Constitution, sanctity of contracts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Johnson v. McIntosh (1823, Marshall)

A

Established that Indian tribes had rights to tribal lands that preceded all other American law; only the federal government can take land from tribes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824, Marshall)

A

Clarified the commerce clause and affirmed Congressional power over interstate commerce.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831, Marshall)

A

Established a “trust relationship” with tribes directly under federal authority. They are a domestic independent nation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Worcester v. Georgia (1831, Marshall)

A

Established tribal autonomy within their boundaries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge (1837, Taney)

A

Declared that interests of the community were more important than the interests of business.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Commonwealth v. Hunt (1842, Taney)

A

Said that labor unions were lawful and that strike was a lawful weapon.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857, Taney)

A

Taney ruled that slave Dred Scott was not a citizen and had no standing in court. Scott’s residence in a free state had not made him free. Slaves are property. Voided Missouri Compromise of 1820.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ex Parte Milligan (1866)

A

Ruled that a civilian cannot be tried in military courts when civil courts are available.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Civil Rights Cases of 1883

A

Legalized segregation in regard to private property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Wabash, St. Louis, and St.Paul Railroad Co. v. Minnesota (1890)

A

Found that Granger law regulations were violations of the 5th Amendment right to property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust (1895)

A

Declared income taxes unconstitutional.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

U.S. v. E.C. Knight Co. (1895)

A

Narrow interpretation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, undermined the authority of the federal government to act against monopolies.

17
Q

Plessy V. Ferguson (1896)

A

Legalized segregation in public facilities, “separate but equal.” Also, “the Constitution does not follow the flag.”

18
Q

Northern Securities Co. v. US (1904)

A

Re-established authority of federal government to fight monopolies under Sherman Anti-Trust Act.

(weakened the act in U.S. v. E.C. Knight Co.)

19
Q

Lochner v. New York (1905)

A

NY act limiting working hours of bakers deemed unconstitutional based on 14th amendment rights.

20
Q

Muller v. Oregon (1908)

A

Recognized 10-hr workday for women laundry workers on grounds of health and community concerns.

21
Q

Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918)

A

Declared Keating-Owen Act (child labor act) unconstitutional on grounds that it was an invasion of state authority.

22
Q

Schneck v. U.S. (1919)

A

Upheld Espionage Act of 1917, declared that people who interfered with the war effort were subject to imprisonment; declared that 1st amendment freedom of speech was not absolute, could be limited when it presented a “clear and present danger.”

Schneck had handed out leaflets saying the draft violated 13th amendment right against involuntary servitude (WW1); resist the draft.

23
Q

Adkins v. Children’s Hospital (1923)

A

Minimum wage law for women ruled unconstitutional because it denied women freedom of contract.

24
Q

Schechter v. U.S. (1936)

A

National Industrial Recovery Act (part of FDR ND) declared unconstitutional on three grounds: (1) delegated legislative power to the executive, (2) lack of constitutional authority for such legislation, (3) sought to regulate business that were wholly interstate (Gibbons v. Ogden, congress has authority over interstate commerce).

25
Q

Korematsu v. U.S. (1941)

A

Upheld constitutionality of concentration camps for Japanese-Americans during WWII.

26
Q

Ex Parte Endo (1944)

A

Forbade internment of Japanese-Americans born in the US.

27
Q

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas (1954, Warren)

A

Unanimous decision ruling “separate but equal” unconstitutional.

28
Q

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

A

Right of counsel in all state and federal criminal trials, regardless of ability to pay.

29
Q

Escobedo v. Illinois (1964)

A

Defendant must be allowed to access a lawyer before questioning by the police.

30
Q

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

A

Ruled that those subjected to in-custody interrogation must be advised of their right to remain silent and to an attorney.

31
Q

Roe v. Wade (1973)

A

Legalized abortion by ruling that state laws couldn’t restrict access during first three months of pregnancy. Based on 4th amendment rights.

32
Q

U.S. v. Richard Nixon

A

Rejected Nixon’s claim to absolute “executive privilege” against any judicial process, made him hand over the tapes.

33
Q

Bakke v. Regents of the university of California (1978)

A

Ambiguous ruling by a badly divided court that dealt w/ Affirmative Action programs using race as basis for selecting participants. Generally upheld Affirmative Action.