rule statements Flashcards
(66 cards)
private actor exception to state action
-carrying out traditional govt function
-state entanglement: mutually beneficial contacts
-state facilitated or endorsed private action affirmatively
standing: individual
-particularized injury in fact
-causation
-redressability
organizational standing
-individual members have standing
-claim related to purpose of org
-individual members not necessary to adjudicate b/c org is adequate rep
taxpayer standing
-challenge own tax assessment OR
-establishment clause violation
-through congress’ expenditure powers
mootness
live controversy
exception: capable of repetition yet evading review. subjected to same action but too short to live through case
11th amendment
cannot sue state or state agencies for money damages, UNLESS
-state consents
-congress expressly abrogates through 13-15th amendments
-structural waiver in constitution
abstention
-unsettled case law
-pending state crim cases unless clearly unconstitutional
-injunctive relief to interfere with complex state regulations
-substantially similar to state court case
commerce clause
-channels
-instrumentalities
-economic activities with substantial effect in aggregate (rational basis)
-if noneconomic activities: cannot aggregate, need detailed factual findings that it has substantial effect
spending power
for general welfare
-congress can condition fed funds to get states to do something IF they (1) are unambiguous, (2) relate to the funded program’s purpose, and (3) are not unduly coercive.
delegation of legislative power
need intelligible principle
preemption
express: explicit
implied:
-field preemption
-state law directly conflicts with state law and impossible to follow both
-state law indirectly conflicts
privileges and immunities clause 14th am
states can’t discriminate against citizens of other states with respect to national citizenship rights
UNLESS substantial justification and substantial state interest
commandeering
10th amendment
-fed can’t force states to pass laws
-fed can’t force states to enforce fed laws
DCC
states cannot regulate interstate commerce or unduly burden
-discrimination on its face or in application: states must show important state interest and no other non-discriminatory means available to achieve it
-undue burden: balance purpose of statute against burden on IC and whether there is less restrictive alternatives
-regulating conduct wholly outside state borders
DCC exceptions
-market participant
-necessary to serve state interest and no other ways to do it
-subsidy exception
-traditional govt function
-permisison from congress
takings elements
-government action
-Property interest: intangible property, tangible property, nonpossessory interests
-taking??
-for a public use
–> need just compensation: FMV at time of taking. loss to owner, comparable sales at time of taking
types of takings
Physical occupation even if portion of land
Regulatory: total or partial
-total: no economically viable use of property
-partial: regulatory takings affects some economic use of land. courts balance
–> economic impact: value lost
–> reasonable expectations of return on investment
–> character of regulation: the degree to which it will benefit society, how the regulation distributes the burdens and benefits among property owners, and whether the regulation violates any of the owner’s essential attributes of property ownership
procedural due process
does it apply? Procedural due process only applies in quasi-judicial or adjudicatory settings, and not with respect to the adoption of general legislation
elements:
-interest affected: life, liberty, property. liberty can be fundamental rights. property can be expectation through statute, contract, custom.
value of additional safeguards for accuracy
burden/costs of additional process. efficiency.
fundamental rights
first amendment
voting
interstate travel
privacy (family, sex, parental rights, contraception, marriage)
bear arms
substantive DP
fundamental rights: strict scrutiny
nonfundamental rights: rational basis review
regulation of symbolic speech
-regulation furthers important government interest
-interest is unrelated to suppression of speech
-burden on speech is not greater than necessary
-regulation is within government’s authority
Interesting Understood Bye Asshole = important interest, unrelated, burden not greater, authority
overbreadth
regulates more speech than necessary for compelling govt interest
vagueness
fails to provide person of ordinary intelligence with fair notice of what is prohibited
prior restraint
prohibiting speech before it occurs
only ok if:
-particular harm govt seeking to avoid
-specific procedural safeguards
–> narrowly drawn, reasonable, definite standards
–> must be prompt review of validity of restraint