S4 HadSoc Flashcards
(86 cards)
Why is quality and safety important?
- evidence patient are being harmed and receiving sub standard care
- variations in healthcare e.g. Postcode lottery
- direct costs and legal bills
Sections in defining healthcare quality
SEPTEE Safe Effective Patient centred Timely Efficient Equitable
Three principles NHS was built on
- free to point of access
- meets needs of everyone
- based on clinical need, not ability to pay
Define
- adverse effect
- preventable adverse effect
- never event
Adverse effect
- injury caused by medical management that prolongs hospitalisation, produces disability or both
- common and many unavoidable e.g. Chemo hair loss, streptokinase may cause haemorrhage but not in everyone
Preventable adverse effect
- adverse effect that should have been prevented given current state of medical knowledge e.g. Op on wrong body part
Never events - many occur in surgery - they are preventable adverse effects which have evidence so clear that they should not happen
James Reason’s framework of error
Active failures
- acts that directly harm the patient
Latent conditions
- predisposing conditions that make active failures more likely to occur
E.g. Poor training, few staff, poor design of syringes, over reliance on individual responsibility
Reason’s model of Swiss Cheese
Holes in the Swiss cheese - some due to active failures and others due to latent conditions
Errors occur when the holes line up so barriers to those failures not working
Define clinical governance
Framework through which NHS organisations are accountable for continuously improving the quality of their services and safeguarding high standards of care by creating an environment in which clinical care can flourish
Name the 6 NHS quality improvement mechanisms
SCC DR F
Standard setting
- NICE sets standards based on best quality evidence to define what high quality of care should look like
Commissioning
- CCGs using budgets to meet needs of local population
Clinical audit and quality improvement
- clinical audit: quality improvement process that aims to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic review of are against criteria and implementation of change
- quality improvement is more continual so you are constantly improving care
Disclosure
- disclosing information about performance to patients and public
Registration and inspection
- organisations must be registered with quality care commission
Financial incentives
- QOF (quality and outcomes framework) - primary care GPs score points relative to indicators
- CQUIN (commissioning for quality and innovation) - trusts achieving measurable goals
- National tariff (healthcare resource groups)
Define evidence based practice
Integration of individual clinical exposure with best available external clinical evidence from systematic research
Why are systematic reviews needed?
- traditional literature may be biased and subjective
- quality of studies sometimes poor
- can highlight gaps in research
- can help address clinical uncertainty
They are useful as saves clinicians time, reduces delay between findings and implementation, help prevent bias decisions
Practical and philosophical criticisms around evidence based practice
Practical criticisms
- impossible to create and maintain systematic reviews across all specialities
- RCTs not always feasible/necessary/desirable
Philosophical criticisms
- If works at population level does not mean it will work at individual level
- potential of EBM to create unreflective rule followers
- when does professional autonomy and responsibility overtake EBM?
- does not align with doctors mode of reasoning
Why is there a gap between evidence and implementation?
- Evidence exists but Drs do not know about it
- Doctors know about it but do not use it e.g. Do not agree
- Resources not available to implement change
- Commissioning decisions reflect different priorities
Quantitative research methods
Reliable and repeatable
Use questionnaires
- should be valid (measure what they are supposed to measure) and reliable (measure things consistently)
- published questionnaires already tested for validity and reliability
Qualitative research methods
Makes sense of phenomena in terms of meanings people bring to them
- Observation and ethnography
- Interviews
- Focus groups
- Document and media analysis
Pros and cons of qualitative research
Good as
- understand perspectives
- access info not in quantitative research
- explain relationships between variables
Not good at
- finding consistent relationships between variables
- generalisability
What classification is used do to measure health of people in different socioeconomic positions?
NS-SEC
National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification
Calculated via Census data
6 explanations for inequalities in Health
BAMS (Black Report) PI
Behavioural cultural
- ill health is due to people’s choices and decisions (does not consider adverse conditions and social processes)
Artefact
- health inequalities are evident due to the way statistics are collected
Materialistic
- inequalities in health arise from differential access to material resources e.g. Housing conditions, income, employment
Social selection
- Health determines class/ position through social mobility
Psychosocial
- psychosocial pathways act in addition to direct effects of absolute material living standards e.g. Stressors
Income distribution
- countries with greater income inequalities have greater health inequalities
- increased income inequality, increased social-evaluative threat, increased stress, decreased health
Define
- inequality
- inequity
Inequality - when things are different
Inequity - inequalities that are unfair and avoidable
Can have inequality without inequity
E.g. Different gps offering different services to meet needs of region. But if region had as,e needs then it would be an inequity
Why do people in deprived areas have higher rates of GP/ emergency services and use less preventative services?
- Manage health as series of crises
- Normalisation of ill health
- Use more accessible services
- Reflects lack of cultural alignment between health services and lower socio-economic groups
Define health promotion
Enabling people to increase control over and improve their health
Public Health England has duty to protect and improve nation’s health and wellbeing and reduce health inequalities
Sociological perspectives on health promotion
- focuses on individual responsibility - victim blaming
- way of monitoring and regulating population - encourages self surveillance
- health promotion privileges certain lifestyles and those wealthier - widens inequalities
5 approaches to health promotion
- medical/ prevention e.g. Smoking
- behaviour change
- educational
- empowerment - client centred approach
- social change e.g. Smoking ban
Levels of prevention
Primary prevention
- prevent onset of the disease by reducing exposure to risk factors e.g. Immunisations
Secondary prevention
- detect and treat disease at early stage to prevent progression/ further complications e.g. Screening
Tertiary prevention
- minimise the effects of an established disease
Health promotion dilemmas
- Ethics of interfering with peoples lives
- Victim blaming
- Fallacy of empowerment (information does not give people power)
- Reinforcement of negative stereotypes
- Unequal distribution of responsibility
- Prevention paradox (interventions that make a difference at population level may not make much of a difference at individual level)