SCAI KERN CHAP 10 OCT Flashcards

(22 cards)

1
Q

Q1: Which imaging modality provides higher axial resolution, OCT or IVUS?

Q2: What is the axial resolution range for OCT?

Q3: What is the axial resolution range for IVUS?

Q4: Which modality has greater penetration depth, OCT or IVUS?

Q5: What is the penetration depth of OCT?

Q6: What is the penetration depth of IVUS?

Q7: What types of structures attenuate OCT imaging?

Q8: Why is flushing required during OCT imaging?

Q9: What fluids are used for flushing during OCT?

Q10: How does blood affect OCT signals?

Q11: What recent technology uses OCT-derived vessel geometries?

Q12: What computational method is applied to OCT vessel geometries?

Q13: What does virtual fractional flow reserve (vFFR) evaluate?

Q14: What two aspects can this developing OCT technology assess simultaneously?

Q15: Why is this combined functional and morphological assessment important?

A

A1: OCT

A2: 10-20 µm

A3: 50-150 µm

A4: IVUS

A5: 1-2 mm

A6: 5-6 mm

A7: Thrombus, lipid necrotic core, calcium ( structures that absorb infrared lights )

A8: To displace blood from the imaging field ( blood attenuates IR light by scattering )

A9: Radiocontrast or sometimes saline

A10: Blood attenuates OCT signal by scattering infrared light

A11: Virtual fractional flow reserve (vFFR)

A12: Computational fluid dynamics

A13: Functional significance of coronary lesions

A14: Functional significance and morphological plaque characteristics

A15: It improves diagnosis and treatment planning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Q1: What are the main components of an OCT imaging system?

Q2: With what should the imaging catheter be flushed during OCT acquisition?

Q3: Why is the same flushing material used in the catheter and coronary artery?

Q4: What is critical for optimal OCT image acquisition regarding the guide catheter?

Q5: What should be avoided during guide catheter engagement?

Q6: What medication is recommended before OCT image acquisition?

Q7: Why is intracoronary nitroglycerin given prior to OCT imaging?

Q8: What effect does nitroglycerin have on the vessel?

Q9: What complication does nitroglycerin help reduce during OCT?

Q10: Why is proper flushing important in OCT imaging?

A

A1: Imaging catheter, drive motor control, and software

A2: Radiocontrast or occasionally saline

A3: To ensure consistent flushing and image quality

A4: Appropriate guide catheter engagement

A5: Ejection of the guide catheter

A6: Intracoronary nitroglycerin

A7: To dilate the vessel

A8: Vasodilation

A9: Catheter-induced coronary spasm

A10: To displace blood and improve image clarity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Q1: Where is the OCT catheter positioned relative to the target lesion?

Q2: What is done to the OCT catheter before imaging after positioning?

Q3: What is the purpose of the small puff given through the guide catheter?

Q4: What should be done if blood clearance is suboptimal during OCT imaging?

Q5: What device may be required to prevent reflux of flush medium into the aorta?

Q6: What happens after optimal guide catheter engagement and blood clearance?

Q7: How can the flush be administered during OCT pullback?

Q8: What is the common flush rate for the left coronary artery?

Q9: What is the total flush volume for the left coronary artery?

Q10: What is the common flush rate for the right coronary artery?

Q11: What is the total flush volume for the right coronary artery?

Q12: What is the pressure limit for flushing during OCT?

Q13: Why might larger flush volumes be required?

Q14: What imaging is performed during OCT pullback to help with coregistration?

Q15: What is the sequence of OCT imaging steps?

A

A1: Approximately 10 mm distal to the target lesion

A2: Purged again

A3: To ensure optimal guide catheter engagement and blood clearance

A4: Adjust guide catheter position and engagement

A5: Guide catheter extension

A6: Automated pullback of the OCT catheter is activated

A7: Manually or by automated injector

A8: 4 mL/s

A9: 14 to 16 mL

A10: 3 mL/s

A11: 12 to 14 mL

A12: 300 psi

A13: For larger arteries

A14: Cine angiography

A15: Position, purge, puff, pullback

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Q1: What does the bright-dark-bright trilaminar appearance in normal coronary artery OCT images represent?

Q2: Which three layers correspond to the trilaminar appearance?

Q3: What happens to the normal architecture in diseased vessels on OCT?

Q4: What type of plaques appear as low-attenuating signal-rich (bright) lesions?

Q5: How do lipid-rich plaques appear on OCT?

Q6: What covers the high-attenuating signal-poor regions in lipid-rich plaques?

Q7: How do calcific plaques appear on OCT?

Q8: What characterizes the appearance of calcific plaques on OCT?

Q9: What type of thrombus is high-attenuating and casts a shadow on the vessel wall?

Q10: How does white thrombus appear on OCT?

Q11: What is the attenuation characteristic of fibrous plaques?

Q12: What is the attenuation characteristic of lipid-rich plaques?

Q13: Are calcific plaques sharply or poorly demarcated on OCT?

Q14: What is the most common pathology observed in the lumen on OCT?

Q15: What is the significance of shadows cast by thrombus on OCT images?

A

A1: Light reflected from the three vessel layers

A2: Intima, media, and adventitia

A3: Loss of normal trilaminar architecture

A4: Fibrous plaques

A5: High-attenuating, signal-poor (dark) regions

A6: Fibrous cap

A7: Low-attenuating, sharply demarcated signal-poor regions

A8: Low attenuation and sharp borders

A9: Red thrombus is black ( high absorbing or high attenuating )

A10: Low-attenuating (light) white thrombus is white

A11: Low attenuation, signal-rich (bright)

A12: High attenuation, signal-poor (dark)

A13: Sharply demarcated

A14: Thrombus (red or white)

A15: Indicates presence of dense material blocking the OCT signal

** white or bright = reflects the light that is why it is bright = does not absorb the light = low absorption means low attenuation.

*** dark = does not reflect the light = absorbs the light = attenuates ( high attenuation) the light.

** when the structure absorbs the light ( attenuates the light ) like lipid, everything beyond is shadowed because of the absorption. So you do not see structures beyond the lipid rich plaque.

***** calcium is an excpetion, it looks like sharply demarcated dark ellipses ( does not reflect light i.e. low signal and does not absorb light either i.e. black )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Q1: What high-resolution imaging modality enables identification of culprit lesions in ACS?

Q2: Name three types of culprit lesions identifiable by OCT in ACS.

Q3: How can identifying different causes of ACS be clinically useful?

Q4: How can OCT help in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissections?

Q5: What type of MI can OCT help clarify regarding culprit lesions?

Q6: What does MI with nonobstructive coronary arteries refer to?

Q7: What is a high-risk vulnerable plaque identifiable by OCT?

Q8: What does TCFA stand for?

Q9: Why are thin-cap fibroatheromas clinically significant?

Q10: How does OCT contribute to the management of non-ST segment elevation MI?

Q11: What is an eruptive calcified nodule?

Q12: What is plaque rupture?

Q13: What is plaque erosion?

Q14: Can OCT distinguish between different pathological causes of ACS?

Q15: Is there further discussion about TCFA in other chapters?

A

A1: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

A2: Plaque rupture, erosion, eruptive calcified nodule

A3: It allows tailored management of ACS

A4: By evaluating vessel wall and lesions

A5: Non-ST segment elevation MI

A6: MI without significant coronary artery obstruction

A7: Thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA)

A8: Thin-cap fibroatheroma

A9: They are prone to rupture and cause ACS

A10: By resolving ambiguity of culprit lesions

A11: A type of calcified lesion causing ACS

A12: A break in the fibrous cap exposing the necrotic core

A13: Damage to the endothelial layer without rupture

A14: Yes

A15: Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Q1: What imaging modality can guide PCI using a standardized approach?

Q2: What does pre-PCI OCT imaging assess to strategize the procedure?

Q3: How does lesion morphology assessment help in PCI planning?

Q4: What are proximal and distal stent landing zones identified by OCT?

Q5: Why is measuring vessel diameter important pre-PCI?

Q6: What is assessed post-PCI using OCT to optimize stent placement?

Q7: What does medial edge dissection detected by OCT indicate?

Q8: What is malapposition in the context of stenting?

Q9: What does underexpansion of stents require?

Q10: What does the mnemonic MLD stand for in pre-PCI OCT assessment?

Q11: What does the mnemonic MAX stand for in post-PCI OCT assessment?

Q12: How does OCT help in selecting balloon and stent sizes?

Q13: Why is it important to identify landing zones with minimal disease?

Q14: What is the clinical significance of detecting medial dissection post-PCI?

Q15: How does the MLD-MAX approach benefit PCI outcomes?

A

A1: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

A2: Lesion morphology, stent landing zones, vessel diameter

A3: Determines appropriate lesion preparation strategies

A4: Zones with minimal or no disease for stent placement

A5: To select appropriate balloon and stent sizes

A6: Medial edge dissection, malapposition, underexpansion

A7: It may require additional stent implantation

A8: When the stent does not fully appose to the vessel wall

A9: Further postdilation

A10: Morphology, Length, Diameter

A11: Medial dissection, Apposition, eXpansion

A12: By providing accurate vessel measurements

A13: To reduce risk of edge complications

A14: It may cause adverse events if untreated

A15: Provides a systematic framework for PCI optimization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
A

A1: Predominantly fibrous or lipid-rich plaques

A2: Noncompliant balloon, cutting/scoring balloon, atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)

A3: OCT

A4: The need for advanced calcium modification

A5: >50% of the circumference

A6: >0.5 mm

A7: >5 mm

A8: The “rule of 5”

A9: Atherectomy or intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)

A10: Because it provides detailed calcium assessment

A11: Stent expansion is lowest

A12: Intravascular lithotripsy

A13: To modify or remove calcified plaque

A14: Noncompliant cutting or scoring balloon

A15: To minimize vessel injury and optimize stent deployment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Q1: What lesion types may be prepared with an undersized balloon or direct stenting?

Q2: What types of balloons or devices are recommended for moderate-severe or severely calcified plaques?

Q3: Which imaging modality allows more detailed assessment of calcium, OCT or IVUS?

Q4: What can an OCT-based scoring system determine?

Q5: What is the maximum arc of calcium circumference associated with lowest stent expansion?

Q6: What is the maximum calcium thickness associated with lowest stent expansion?

Q7: What is the minimum calcium length associated with lowest stent expansion?

Q8: What is the name of the rule related to calcium characteristics in plaques?

Q9: What advanced calcium modification techniques may be needed for plaques meeting the “rule of 5”?

Q10: Why is OCT particularly helpful in assessing calcified plaques?

Q11: What happens to stent expansion in the presence of severe calcification?

Q12: What does IVL stand for?

Q13: What is atherectomy used for in plaque preparation?

Q14: What type of balloon is used for calcified plaques?

Q15: Why might undersized balloons be used in fibrous or lipid-rich plaques?

A

A1: Predominantly fibrous or lipid-rich plaques

A2: Noncompliant balloon, cutting/scoring balloon, atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)

A3: OCT

A4: The need for advanced calcium modification

A5: >50% ( 180 degree ) of the circumference is associated with the lowest stent expansion ( rule of 5 )

A6: >0.5 mm thickness is associated with the lowest stent expansion ( rule of 5 )

A7: >5 mm length is associated with the lowest stent expansion ( rule of 5 )

A8: The “rule of 5”

A9: Atherectomy or intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)

A10: Because it provides detailed calcium assessment

A11: Stent expansion is lowest

A12: Intravascular lithotripsy

A13: To modify or remove calcified plaque

A14: Noncompliant cutting or scoring balloon

A15: To minimize vessel injury and optimize stent deployment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Q1: What needs to be selected to determine lesion length?

Q2: What characteristics should proximal and distal reference segments have?

Q3: How is lesion length calculated?

Q4: Can reference segments be adjusted during lesion length measurement?

Q5: Why should lesion length correspond to the length of a drug-eluting stent?

Q6: What does this strategy help minimize?

Q7: What are stent edge problems?

Q8: What types of disease at reference segments can worsen clinical outcomes?

Q9: What does TCFA stand for?

Q10: Why is visibility of the vessel wall important in selecting reference segments?

A

A1: Proximal and distal reference segments

A2: Minimal atherosclerotic disease and greatest vessel wall visibility

A3: Automatically by imaging software

A4: Yes

A5: To match commercially available stent sizes

A6: Stent edge problems

A7: Problems at the edges of the stent such as restenosis or dissection

A8: Inflow and outflow disease, or TCFA

A9: Thin-cap fibroatheroma

A10: To ensure accurate measurement of lesion length

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Q1: What are the two methods to determine appropriate device sizes?

Q2: Which strategy is preferred, EEL-guided or lumen-guided?

Q3: Why is the EEL-guided strategy preferred?

Q4: How much larger is the balloon or stent size typically with the EEL-guided strategy?

Q5: How is the stent size determined using the EEL-based strategy?

Q6: How is the stent size rounded in the EEL-based strategy?

Q7: What happens if the EEL is not well visualized?

Q8: What causes poor visualization of the EEL?

Q9: How is stent size determined when EEL is not well visualized?

Q10: How is postdilation balloon size determined?

Q11: Should the postdilation balloon size follow the same sizing strategy as stent size?

Q12: What does EEL stand for?

Q13: What is the significance of measuring at least one quadrant apart in EEL-guided strategy?

A

A1: External elastic lamina (EEL)-guided and lumen-guided strategies

A2: EEL-guided strategy

A3: It leads to larger balloon or stent size and larger lumen area

A4: Approximately 0.5 mm larger

A5: Based on EEL-based mean diameter of distal reference

A6: Rounded ** down to nearest available stent size

A7: Use mean lumen diameter of distal reference instead

A8: Attenuation from plaque at reference segments

A9: Rounded ** up to next available stent size

A10: Based on respective reference diameter measurements

A11: Yes

A12: External elastic lamina

A13 : To ensure accurate and representative measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Q1: What segments are assessed after PCI for medial dissection?

Q2: What imaging modality is used to identify post-PCI edge dissections?

Q3: What percentage of cases show post-PCI edge dissections on OCT?

Q4: Do most dissections detected by OCT have significant clinical impact?

Q5: What is the clinical significance of major edge dissections on OCT?

Q6: When is additional stent placement recommended for edge dissections?

Q7: What degree of circumference involvement defines a major dissection?

Q8: What minimum length of dissection extending into the media warrants additional stenting?

Q9: Are there exceptions to placing additional stents for major dissections?

Q10: Why is detecting medial dissection post-PCI important?

A

A1: Proximal and distal reference segments

A2: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

A3: Up to 40%

A4: No, most heal without significant impact

A5: Predictor of adverse clinical outcomes

A6: If dissection involves ≥60° circumference and ≥3 mm length into media

A7: ≥60° of circumference

A8: ≥3 mm in length dissection lenght that extends into the media

A9: Yes, if anatomically prohibitive

A10: To prevent adverse outcomes by optimizing treatment

18
Q

Q1: What does stent malapposition refer to?

Q2: How common is acute stent malapposition on OCT after implantation?

Q3: Does acute stent malapposition increase the risk of stent failure or thrombosis?

Q4: When should further optimization be considered for stent malapposition?

Q5: What length of malapposition is considered large enough to require optimization?

Q6: What additional factor associated with malapposition warrants further optimization?

Q7: What type of balloon inflation is usually sufficient to correct malapposition?

Q8: At what pressure is the semicompliant balloon inflated for optimization?

Q9: Why is proximal malapposition concerning?

Q10: What imaging modality detects stent malapposition?

A

A1: Lack of contact between stent struts and vessel wall

A2: Approximately 50% of cases

A3: *** No, it does not appear to increase risk

A4: Proximal malapposition interfering with rewiring, large malapposition >3 mm, or associated with underexpansion

A5: Greater than 3 mm in length

A6: Stent underexpansion

A7: Semicompliant balloon inflation

A8: Nominal pressure

A9: It can interfere with rewiring during future procedures

A10: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

19
Q

Q1: What is a major predictor of stent failure?

Q2: How can stent expansion be assessed?

Q3: What does MSA stand for?

Q4: What is the recommended absolute MSA for non-left main lesions?

Q5: What is the recommended relative stent expansion percentage?

Q6: How is relative stent expansion calculated?

Q7: Which is more important for predicting adverse outcomes: absolute or relative stent expansion?

Q8: Is achieving the absolute MSA value always possible in small vessels?

Q9: What percentage of cases achieve expansion goals based on relative stent expansion criteria?

Q10: What should be done if stent underexpansion is identified?

Q11: What pressure is recommended for balloon inflation to correct underexpansion?

Q12: What type of balloon is used for high-pressure inflation in underexpanded stents?

Q13: What risks should be considered when attempting further optimization for underexpanded stents?

Q14: Why is relative stent expansion important in clinical practice?

Q15: What is the clinical significance of achieving adequate stent expansion?

A

A1: Stent expansion

A2: By absolute MSA or relative expansion measures

A3: Minimal stent area

A4: Greater than 4.5 mm²

A5: Greater than 80% of mean proximal and distal reference lumen area

A6: MSA divided by mean reference lumen area

A7: Absolute stent expansion (MSA)

A8: No

A9: Approximately 50%

A10: High-pressure balloon inflation

A11: ≥18 atm

A12: Noncompliant balloon

A13: Risk of complications such as perforation

A14: Because absolute MSA may not be achievable in small vessels

A15: It predicts better clinical outcomes and reduces stent failure

20
Q

Q1: What is one anatomical area where OCT has limited role?

Q2: Why is OCT limited in assessing aorto-ostial coronary segments?

Q3: Why is contrast use during OCT image acquisition prohibited in some patients?

Q4: Which patient group is affected by the prohibition of contrast use in OCT?

Q5: What anatomical feature of the left main coronary artery affects OCT imaging?

Q6: Why might the left main coronary artery caliber prohibit adequate flush clearance?

Q7: What alternative flushing agents have been investigated for OCT?

Q8: What issues remain with alternative flushing agents like normal saline?

Q9: What potential risk is associated with alternative flushing agents like normal saline ?

Q10: What is a general limitation of OCT related to blood clearance?

A

A1: Aorto-ostial coronary segments

A2: Difficulty clearing blood from coronary ostia

A3: Contrast use is prohibited in advanced chronic kidney disease

A4: Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease

A5: Large caliber

A6: It may prevent adequate flushing and blood clearance

A7: Normal saline and others

A8: Blood mixing and incomplete clearance

A9: Potential risk of arrhythmia

A10: Need for blood clearance for optimal imaging

21
Q

Q1: What imaging technique identified adverse features warranting additional intervention in 35% of cases in the CLI-OPCI study?

Q2: What risk was reduced at 1 year with OCT-guided PCI after adjusting for confounders?

Q3: Which two imaging guidance methods were compared in the OPINION trial?

Q4: What was demonstrated about OCT guidance compared to IVUS guidance in the OPINION trial?

Q5: In the ILUMIEN III trial, OCT-guided PCI was noninferior to IVUS-guided PCI in terms of what measurement?

Q6: What type of trial was the OCTIVUS study (randomized or observational)?

Q7: How many patients were in the OCT-guided PCI group in the OCTIVUS trial?

Q8: How many patients were in the IVUS-guided PCI group in the OCTIVUS trial?

Q9: What composite endpoint was used in the OCTIVUS trial?

Q10: At what time point were outcomes measured in the OPINION and OCTIVUS trials?

Q11: What does PCI stand for?

Q12: What does IVUS stand for?

Q13: What does OCT stand for?

Q14: What does MSA stand for in the ILUMIEN III trial context?

Q15: What was the primary endpoint in the OPINION trial?

A

A1: OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography)

A2: Risk of myocardial infarction (MI) or cardiac death

A3: OCT-guided PCI and IVUS-guided PCI

A4: Noninferiority of OCT guidance compared to IVUS guidance ( TVF or target vessel failure at 1 year )

A5: Final Minimal Stent Area (MSA)

A6: Large-scale randomized controlled trial

A7: 1005 patients

A8: 1003 patients

A9: Cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization

A10: 1 year

A11: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

A12: Intravascular Ultrasound

A13: Optical Coherence Tomography

A14: Minimal Stent Area

A15: Target vessel failure at 1 year

22
Q

Q1: What trial compared OCT- and angiography-guided PCI in high-risk patients?

Q2: How many patients were in the OCT-guided group in the ILUMIEN IV trial?

Q3: How many patients were in the angiography-guided group in the ILUMIEN IV trial?

Q4: What measurement was larger in the OCT-guided PCI group compared to angiography-guided PCI in ILUMIEN IV?

Q5: What two factors contributed to larger stent expansion in OCT-guided PCI in ILUMIEN IV?

Q6: Was there a difference in the primary clinical endpoint between OCT and angiography guidance in ILUMIEN IV?

Q7: What clinical event was significantly reduced by OCT-guided PCI compared to angiography-guided PCI in ILUMIEN IV?

Q8: What trial compared OCT- and angiography-guided PCI in complex bifurcation lesions?

Q9: How many patients were in the OCT-guided group in the OCTOBER trial?

Q10: How many patients were in the angiography-guided group in the OCTOBER trial?

Q11: What was the composite endpoint reduced by OCT-guided PCI in the OCTOBER trial?

Q12: What trial studied intravascular imaging-guided PCI versus angiography-guided PCI in complex coronary lesions?

Q13: Which two imaging modalities were used in the RENOVATE-COMPLEX PCI trial?

Q14: Did the RENOVATE-COMPLEX PCI trial find consistent results between IVUS and OCT?

Q15: Are there differences in clinical outcomes between OCT- and IVUS-guided PCI according to the summary?

A

A1: ILUMIEN IV trial

A2: 1233 patients

A3: 1254 patients

A4: Final Minimal Stent Area (MSA)

A5: Selection of larger stents and more frequent postdilation at higher pressures

A6: No apparent difference

A7: Stent thrombosis

A8: OCTOBER trial

A9: 600 patients

A10: 601 patients

A11: Cardiac death, target-lesion MI, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization

A12: RENOVATE-COMPLEX PCI trial

A13: IVUS and OCT

A14: Yes, consistent results in subgroup analysis

A15: No apparent difference