Secured Transactions Flashcards

1
Q

What is Security?

A

The transference of a proprietary right or interest in an asset by one party (the ‘Giver’) to another (the ‘Taker’) to collateralize its obligations thereto.

P. 815.

Proprietary Rights are otherwise known as rights in rem.

Note that this Deck will not concern itself with Real Property, i.e. land, but rather only tangible and intangible Personal Property, i.e. goods.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the Commercial Purposes of Security?

A
  • Risk Mitigation: It affords the Taker recourse, through the asset, outside of insolvency should the Giver default on its obligations.
  • Risk Deterrence: It discourages the Giver from taking unnecessary risks or acting recklessly.
  • Priority in Insolvency: It may afford the Taker a claim that supersedes others Creditors’, perhaps even in the same asset.
  • Price Negotiation: Givers may offer security to secure lower prices from Takers.

P. 816.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is an All Monies Clause?

A

A provision stating that a Security’s scope extends to all the Giver’s obligations to the Taker.

P. 822.

This Includes present, future, actual, contingent, and prospective obligations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the Commercial Purpose of an All Monies Clause?

A
  • Decrease credit risk by expanding the Security’s scope.
  • Increase flexibility by allowing the Taker to advance further funds without regularly needing to create Security.

Lecture Notes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the Types and Sub-Types of Security under English law?

A

Possessory:
* Pledge.
* Contractual Lien.

Non-Possessory:
* Debenture.
* Legal Mortgage.
* Equitable Lien.
* Equitable Charge.
* Equitable Mortgage.

P. 816; Re Cosslett [1998] Ch 495, at [45].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the Prerequisites for Security to Attach to an Asset?

Attachment being the instant the Taker gains a proprietary interest.

A
  • Identification: The asset must be sufficiently identified.°
  • Ownership: The asset must be in the Giver’s ownership.°°
  • Intention: The Parties must intend for the asset to collateralize an obligation.°°°
  • Value Given: The Giver must receive value from the Taker in exchange for the Security.°°°°
  • Documentation: There must be a valid Security Agreement (SA), signed and in writing, outlining the Parties’ rights and obligations.°°°°°

Value Given is effectively whatever the broader transaction concerns.

° Cresswell v Potter [1979] 1 WLR 43.
°° National Westminster v RBS Securities [1998] 2 All ER 609.
°°° Palmer v Carey [1926] AC 703.
°°°° Re Pavlou [1993] BCLC 292
°°°°° Neste Oy v Lloyds Bank [1983] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 658.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the Essential Characteristics of Security?

A

The proprietary interest must:
* Transference: Transfer from the Giver to the Taker.
* Priority: Have priority over inferior interests in the asset in insolvency.
* Perfection: Be perfected under the laws of the relevant jurisdiction(s).
* Equitable Right to Redeem: Be redeemable by the Giver once its obligation(s) are discharged.
* Enforceability: Be enforceable under the laws of the relevant jurisdiction(s) and the Parties’ agreement.

Spectrum Plus [2005] UKHL 41.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the Equitable Right to Redeem?

A

The Giver’s right to regain its whole Security° upon the unconditional discharge of its obligations.°°

P. 817.
° Law Debenture v Concord Trust [2007] EWHC 1380, at [53].
°° Çukurova Finanace v Alfa Telecom (No. 3 & 5) [2013] UKPC 25, at [17].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

May the Equitable Right to Redeem be Qualified?

A
  • Yes, by way of contractual agreement between the Parties; however,
  • Provisions preventing its exercise will be void.

Perpetual Debentures under §739 CA 2006 notwithstanding.

P. 817; Noakes v Rice [1902] AC 24.

Such provisions are called ‘Clogs’. Precisely when a provision is a Clog is unclear. For instance, a provision postpoing the Right is not a Clog,° but only insofar as the postponement is reasonable in duration.°°

° Teevan v Smith (1882) 20 ChD 724.
°° Morgan v Jeffreys [1910] 1 Ch 620.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the Order of Claims in an English Liquidation?

A
  1. Ownership of Assets, Fixed Security over Assets, and Liquidation Set-Off Rights.
  2. Expenses of the Insolvency Proceedings.
  3. Preferential Creditors.
  4. Floating Charges.
  5. Unsecured Creditors.
  6. Shareholders.

This list is not comprehensive, but suitable for my purposes..

P. 819-820.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What types of Assets does Possessory Security concern?

A
  • Tangible personal property.
  • Documentary intangible personal property, e.g. a Bond.

P. 847.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a Pledge?

A

An arrangement wherein the Giver (Pledgor) transfers possession of an asset, actual or constructive, to the Taker (Pledgee) as collateral.

P. 847.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How may a Pledge be enforced?

A

Through an inherent power of sale in the Security.

P. 847; Ponthonier v Dawson (1816) Holt 383.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the Two Types of Possession that may constitute a Pledge?

A
  • Actual Possession, wherein the Taker gains physical control of the asset or its Bill of Lading;° and
  • Constructive Possession, wherein the Giver holds the asset for the Taker on attornment or as a Trustee.°°

P. 847.
° Wrightson v McArthur [1921] 2 KB 207.
°° Dublin City Distillery v Doherty [1914] AC 823.

Here, attornment means an official acknowledgement of the Taker’s proprietary interest in the pledged asset.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a Bill of Lading?

A

A document of title to the asset, the only one accepted under English law.

P. 848; Impala Warehousing v Wanxiang Resources [2015] EWHC 811.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a Contractual Lien?

A

An arrangement wherein the Giver (Lienor) transfers the right of possession in an asset to the Taker (Lienee) as collateral.

P. 848.

The right of possession is otherwise known as the right of detention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Do Contractual Liens possess an Inherent Power of Sale?

A

No, although one may be included through contract.

P. 848.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is a Legal Mortgage?

A

An arrangement wherein the Giver’s (Mortgagor) title in an asset is transferred in law to the Taker (Mortgagee) as collateral.

P. 849.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

By what Mechanisms may the Legal Mortgage of a Chose in Action be effected?

A
  • Novation; or
  • Legal Assignment.

Additional steps may be necessary depending on the chose in action.

P. 850.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the Necessary Formalities for creating a Legal Mortgage?

A
  1. The Deed: A document outlining the agreement’s terms and conditions must be created.
  2. Signature: The Deed must be signed by both parties.
  3. Transfer: Legal title in the Security must be transferred to the Taker, usually by way of a conveyance.
  4. Perfection (Registration): The agreement must be registered with the Land Registry or Companies House, as the case may be.

To one extent or another, this applies to all forms of Security.

Lecture Notes.

Registration with Companies House is governed by §859 CA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How does an Assigned Legal Mortgage affect the Enforceability of the underlying Chose in Action?

A

It has no effect. If the Mortgagor is wronged thereunder, its losses will be recoverable.

For instance, it may enforce and recover against a breach of contract.

P. 851; Bovis International v Circle [1995] 49 Conv LR 12.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Do Legal Mortgages require Valuable Consideration?

A

No.

However, this may leave it vulnerable to claims under §238-§239 IA 1986.

P. 851; Nanney v Morgan (1887) 37 ChD 346.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is an Equitable Mortgage?

A

An arrangement wherein the Giver’s (Mortgagor) title in an asset is transferred in equity to the Taker (Mortgagee) as collateral.

Lecture Notes.

In other words, the benefit of the Giver’s title is held in favor the Taker.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Why may an Equitable Mortgage arise instead of a Legal Mortgage?

A
  • Transferability: The Security is not transferrable at law.
  • Subject Matter: The Security is a type of equitable property, such as a beneficial interest.
  • Formalities: The requisite steps for a Legal Mortgage cannot be or were not fulfilled.

P. 853.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
What are the Necessary Formalities for creating an Equitable Mortgage?
*In all cases:* * **Intention:** The Parties must have clearly intended to create the arrangement. *In cases of equitable interests in property:* * **The Deed:** A document outlining the agreement's terms and conditions must be created. * **Signature:** The Deed must be signed by both parties. * **Valuable Consideration:** The transaction must be supported by consideration. ## Footnote P. 853-854. Practically, all Mortgages or other Security Agreements will be: (a) in writing for clarity's sake; and (b) supported by consideration to avoid issues under §239 IA.
26
What is an Equitable Lien?
An arrangement to **secure payment** of the **property’s purchase price**, affording the **Giver** a **right** to have the **property held as security** until the price is paid. ## Footnote P. 855. In High Finance, this is a rather unusual form of security.
27
How does an Equitable Lien arise?
By **operation of law unless** the **Giver takes security** for the relevant **obligation**.° ## Footnote P. 855. ° *Capital Finance v Stokes* [1969] 1 Ch 261.
28
What is a Debenture?
An arrangement wherein **all**, or **substantively all**, of the **Giver's assets** are **transferred in equity** to the **Taker** as collateral. ## Footnote P. 857.
29
What is a Charge?
An arrangement wherein the **Giver’s** (Chargor) **beneficial interest** in an asset is **transferred in law or equity** to the **Taker** (Chargee) as collateral. ## Footnote P. 855. Hereafter, only Equitable Charges are analysed since the earlier discussion on Legal Mortgages would make analysing Legal Charges largely redundant.
30
What are the Two Types Equitable of Charge?
**Fixed** and **Floating**. ## Footnote P. 856. Again, these may also be Legal Charges.
31
What is a Fixed Charge?
An Equitable Charge that **attaches** to a **specific asset** or **group of assets**. ## Footnote P. 856.
32
What is a Floating Charge?
An Equitable Charge that **pertains** to a **specific asset** or **group of assets**, which **may vary**, but **only attaches** thereto **after** a **Specified Event** occurs. | Attachment is otherwise called 'crystallization'. ## Footnote P. 856; *Re Yorkshire* [1903] 2 Ch 284. Specified Events are always outlined in the terms and conditions.
33
What are the Differences between Fixed and Floating Charges?
1. **Subject Matter:** The assets of Floating Charges may change with time, unlike Fixed Charges. 2. **Legal Status:** Fixed Charges are crystallized from execution, unlike Floating Charges that only crystallize after a specified event. 3. **Enforceability:** Once executed, Fixed Charges are enforceable whenever, whereas Floating Charges are only enforceable once crystallized. 4. **Commercial Flexibility:** Floating Charges allow the Giver to unilaterally use varying assets in the ordinary course of business until crystallization, unlike Fixed Charges. 5. **Registration:** Fixed Charges are registered once, namely at execution, whereas Floating Charges are registered twice, namely at execution and crystallization. 6. **Priority:** Fixed Charges take priority over Floating Charges in the same asset(s), and Floating Chargees' priority may be defeated by or subordinated to a Third Party dealing in the asset. ## Footnote Lecture Notes.
34
What is the Main Distinguishing Factor between Fixed and Floating Charges?
* A Charge is **Floating** if the **Giver** can **freely deal** with the **assets without** the **Taker's consent**. * A Charge is **Fixed** if the **Taker** is **personally**° in **full control** of the **assets** and the **Giver** is **unable to deal** with them **unilaterally**. ## Footnote P. 864-865; *Agnew v Commissioner* [2001] UKPC 28. ° *Re ASRS Establishment* [2000] 2 BCLC 631. Even a partial deprivation of the ability to freely deal would be insufficient. See *In Re Brightlife* [1987] Ch 2000, at [209]. Also, consent must not be unreasonably withheld. See *Commercial First v Atkins* [2012] EWHC 4388.
35
Regarding Equitable Charges and Control, what constitutes being In Control of an Asset?
**Having say** over **whether** and **how** the **asset is dealt with**. ## Footnote P. 868; *Gray v GTP Group* [2010] EWHC 1772 (Ch).
36
Regarding Fixed Charges and Control, must the Taker be in Full Control of all Elements of an Asset?
**Not necessarily**. What precisely the Taker must control **depends** on: 1. **How** the asset **generates income**; 2. **Whether income generation** is the asset's **sole source of value**; and 3. **Whether** the asset is **destroyed by income generation**. ## Footnote P. 873; *Spectrum* [2005] UKHL 41.
37
In Practice, how does a Court determine whether a Charge is Fixed or Floating?
By observing the **Parties' rights** and **obligations** and their **conduct** vis-à-vis the **Security**. ## Footnote P. 865; *Agnew v Commissioner* [2001] UKPC 28.
38
What constitutes Freely Dealing with an Asset?
The **general concept** of **carrying on business**, which extends to:° * Exceptional transactions;°° * Abuses of power by Directors;°° and * *Bona fide* major asset disposals.°°° ## Footnote P. 866. ° *Driver v Board* [1893] QBD 744, at [748]-[749]. °° *Willmot v London Celluloid* (1886) 34 ChD 147. °°° *Re Florence Land* (1878) 10 ChD 530.
39
Regarding Fixed Charges over Receivables, is there a Distinction between Collected and Uncollected Debts?
**No**, meaning that the **Giver** must be **initially deprived** of the **ability to dispose** of **both**. ## Footnote P. 869; *Spectrum* [2005] UKHL 41. Note that creating a Fixed Charge over the contract generating receivables may severely restrict the ability to vary that contract.
40
Regarding Fixed Charges over Receivables, what sort of Account must be used?
A **Blocked Account**, namely one that **denies access** to the **Giver** and thereby **facilitates** the **Taker's control**. ## Footnote P. 870; *Spectrum* [2005] UKHL 41. Alternatives include Equitable Assignment and Assignment by way of Mortgage. A Block Account may still be accessed by the Giver, but only upon request and at the Taker's discretion, as evidenced by written consent. See *Keenan Bros* [1986] BCLC 242.
41
Regarding Fixed Charges over Plant and Equipment, what is the Taker's Chief Concern?
The **Giver's ability to dispose** of the **asset**, such as by way of replacement, bailment, sale-and-leaseback, etc. ## Footnote P. 872-873.
42
Regarding Crystallization, does the Law imply Specific Events?
**Yes**, including: * Winding up;° * Appointment of a Receiver;°° * Permanent cessation of business;°°° | Naturally, this does not apply if the agreement says otherwise. ## Footnote P. 879. ° *Re Panama* (1870) LR 5 Ch App 318. °° *Evans v Rival Granite* [1910] 2 KB 979. °°° *Re Woodroffes* [1986] Ch 366.
43
Regarding Floating Charges, what is the Taker's Priority vis-à-vis the Giver's Counterparties, i.e. Third Parties? | Assuming the Third Parties' Security is at least as strong.
*Before Crystallization:* * The **Third Party prevails**, **unless** it had **notice** of a **negative pledge**.° *After Crystallization:* * The **general priority** and **insolvency rules apply**. ## Footnote P. 880-886. ° *English & Scottish v Brunton* [1892] 2 QB 700.
44
Regarding Equitable Charges over Financial Instruments, what are the Taker's Chief Concerns?
Whether the **Giver** is **authorized to collateralize** them and whether the **enforcement** of such **Security** is **fettered**. | This is particularly important for shares. ## Footnote P. 887.
45
Regarding Equitable Charges over Financial Instruments, may Equitable Interests in Shares subsist?
**No**. ## Footnote P. 888; §126 CA 2006. Consequently, a Legal Mortgage is the best way to collateralize shares, unless the shares are intermediated, in which case, an Equitable Charge or Mortgage over the interest in the shares is the go-to. See P. 892-894.
46
What is a Charge-Back?
The **collateralizing** of an **obligation owed by** the **Taker to** the **Giver** in the **Taker's favor**, usually by way of a charge. ## Footnote P. 909; *Re Bank of Credit* [1998] AC 214. In other words, the Taker seeks to take security over its own liability.
47
Why may a Charge-Back be preferrable to Set-Off?
It provides the **Taker** with **greater certainty**, as **set-off rights** vis-à-vis the given liability **may not exist or otherwise obtain**. ## Footnote P. 910. That said, it is yet unclear how or whether a charge-back is subject to insolvency set-off. See P. 912-915.
48
What is a Flawed Asset Provision?
A provision stating that: * A **liability from A to B** may be **withheld** and **will not fall due** for **payment** or **discharge**; while * **Any liability** remains **outstanding from B to A**. ## Footnote P. 915.
49
What is the Commercial Purpose a Flawed Asset Provision?
**Decrease credit risk** by **providing** the **Taker** with **set-off rights** and ensuring it is **not left with unpaid liabilities**. ## Footnote Lecture Notes.
50
What is the Legal Right of Set-Off?
* The **netting** of a **pre-existing**, **separate**, **unconnected**, **precisely calculable**, and **currently due claim**; * **Owed** by the **Taker** to the **Giver**; * **Against** the **Giver's current debt** to the **Taker**. | It arises only in litigation to avoid a multiplicity of suits. ## Footnote P. 731, P. 918; *Christie v Taunton* [1893] 2 CH 175.
51
What is the Equitable Right of Set-Off?
The **netting of cross-claims recognized in equity** but not in law. ## Footnote Lecture Notes.
52
What are the Three Types of Equitable Set-Off?
* Beneficial Set-Off. * Transaction Set-Off. * Transferred Set-Off. ## Footnote P. 919.
53
What is Transaction Set-Off?
The **netting of a cross-claim so closely connected** with the Transferee's claim against the Borrower that it would be **manifestly unjust to enforce without accounting for this claim**. ## Footnote P. 919; *Bim Kemi v Blackburn Chemicals* [2001] EWCA Civ 457.
54
Regarding Transaction Set-off, how is a Cross-Claim's proximity to the Original Claim determined?
By observing whether **the claims**: * Pertain to the **same subject matter**;° * Bear a **functional resemblence** to one another;°° or * **Arise** from the **same arrangement** or **series of arrangements**.°° ## Footnote P. 919. ° *Newfoundland v Newfoundland Ry Co.* (1888) 13 App Cas 199. °° *Geldof v Simon Craves* [2010] EWCA Civ 667.
55
What is Beneficial Set-Off?
The netting of **claims** that are **legally between different parties**, but at the **beneficial level**, **actually between** the **Giver** and **Taker**. ## Footnote P. 921; *Cochrane v Green* (1860) CB (NS) 448.
56
What is Transferred Set-Off?
The netting of **claims assigned in equity**, namely between the **Giver** and **Assignee**. ## Footnote P. 921.
57
What is the Contractual Right of Set-Off?
The **use of contract** to **net claims** under **circumstances** that **would not arise** in **law** or **equity**. | The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 applying. ## Footnote P. 922. Given its customizability and greater degree of certainty, this type of Set-Off is the most valuable, but in an insolvency, it is subservient to Insolvency Set-Off. Also, the Banker's Right of Set-Off, which allows a Bank to net a Customer's balances to satisfy a debt, is a variant of the general Contractual Right of Set-off. See P. 924-925.
58
What is Insolvency Set-Off?
The **mandatory** and **self-executing netting** of an **insolvent party's** liabilities pursuant to **§323 IA** and **Rule 4.90 IR**. ## Footnote P. 931. Notably, the labilities must be due at insolvency, arise from mutual dealings, and exhibit mutuality at the legal and beneficial levels. See P. 931-933.
59
By when must a Security be Registered with Companies House?
**21 days from** the **Day after Creation**. **Failure to register** before then **voids the Security** and renders the Debt immediately payable. | Form MR01. ## Footnote P. 947-948; §859 CA. Under §859, the appointment of a receiver must also be notified, but within only seven days. In practice it will usually be the lender’s solicitors who will complete the registration formalities, as it is the lender who has most to lose in the event of non-registration. Under s 859P CA 2006, a company must keep available for inspection a copy of every charge and a copy of every instrument that amends or varies any charge. Such copies may be certified copies rather than originals. These documents must be kept at either the company’s registered office or such other location as is permitted under the Companies (Company Records) Regulations 2008 (s 859Q(2) CA 2006). A company must inform Companies House of the place where such documents are available for inspection and of any changes to that place (s 859Q(3) CA 2006). These documents must be available for inspection by any creditor or member of the company free of charge and by any other person on payment of a prescribed fee (s 859Q(4) CA 2006). If a company refuses such inspection, then the court may order that the company allows an immediate inspection. Under s 859Q(5) CA 2006, failure to comply with any of the above requirements will be an offence and the company (and every officer of the company who is in default) will be liable to a fine.
60
Regarding Priority, what are the General Principles for sorting rank?
* One **cannot confer** a **better estate than** one **possesses**. * **Competing Equitable Interests** where the **equities are equal** are **ranked by timing**.° * A **Later Interest** will be **subordinate** to an **Earlier Interest** if the former's holder is **notified** of the **latter** (*Dearle v Hall* notwithstanding). * ***Bona fide* purchasers for value** **ignorant** of an **Earlier Equitable Interest** will nevertheless acquire a **prevailing legal interest**,°° **unless** the subject is a **chose in action**.° ## Footnote P. 957. ° *E Pfeiffer v Arbuthnot* [1988] 1 WLR 150, at [161]-[163]. °° *Pilcher v Rawlins* (1872) LR 7 Ch App 259.
61
Regarding Further Advances, how can an Earlier Interest Holder maintain its Priority over a Later Interest Holder?
By demonstrating that: * It was **unaware** of the **Later Interest**. * It is so **entitled** under an **Inter-Creditor Agreement**. * It was **obliged** to make **further advances** under its **security agreemnt**. ## Footnote P. 962; §94(3) Law of Property Act 1925.
62
How may the Taker enforce its Security?
* Foreclosure. * The power of sale. * The right to take possession. * Application of cash balances. * Appropriation of financial collateral.
63
What is Foreclosure?
A **court-ordered extinguishment** of the **Giver's equity of redemption**, rendering the **Taker**: * The **unencumbered owner** thereof; and * Unable to further pursue the Giver for the secured debt. ## Footnote P. 993; *Silbeschildt v Schiott* (1814) 3 Ves & B 45. Foreclosure is only available for Legal Mortgages or Equitable Mortgages that may yet be perfected.
64
What is the Commercial Utility of Foreclosure?
It provides **certainty** and **finality**. ## Footnote Lecture Notes.
65
For which Types of Security is Foreclosure available?
* **Legal mortgages**;° and * **Equitable mortgages** that **may** yet be **perfected**.°° ## Footnote P. 993. ° *General Credit v Glegg* (1883) 22 Ch D 549. °° *Perry v Partridge* (1836) 6 LJ Ch 67.
66
What is the Power of Sale?
The **right** to **sell the asset to recover the debt**, the nature of which differs for posessory and non-possessory security. ## Footnote P. 995.
67
How does the Power of Sale differ for Possessory and Non-Possessory Security?
* For **Possessory Security**, the **right** is **inherent** to the arrangement;° whereas * For **Non-Possessory Security**, an **express inclusion** is **advisable** because **no such right** is necessarily **implied**.°° ## Footnote P. 995-996. ° *Pothonier v Dawson* (1816) Holt 383. °° *Re Morritt* (1886) 18 QBD 222. Only Mortgages and Charges made by deed will include an implied Power of Sale. See §101(1)(i) -- LPA 1925.
68
What is the Commercial Utility of the Power of Sale?
It is **timely**, **cost-effective**, and provides **greater control** over the **sale process** relative to foreclosure. ## Footnote Lecture Notes.
69
What Duties does the Power of Sale beget?
The obligation to: * **Act in good faith**;° * **Not sell to itself**;°° and * **Obtain** a **proper price** according to the asset's true market value.°°° ## Footnote P. 996-997. ° *Downsview Nominees v First City* [1993] AC 295. °° *Martinson v Clowes* (1882) 21 ChD 857. °°° *Cuckmere Brick v Mutual Finance* [1971] Ch 949.
70
What is the Right to Take Possession?
The right to take **unencumbered legal**, and if possible **physical**, **possession** of the **Security**, pursuant to certain duties. ## Footnote Lecture Notes.
71
What Duties does the Right to Take Possession beget?
The **obligation** to: * **Protect** and **take reasonable care** of the asset; while * **Maximally exploiting** it **without** taking **undue risk**. ## Footnote P. 995; *Silven Properties v RBS* [2003] EWCA 1409.
72
For which Types of Security is the Right to Take Possession available?
**All types**, but **only if express reference** is made. ## Footnote P. 995. This is because the right is implied only for legal mortgages. See *Western Bank v Schindler* [1977] Ch 1.
73
How is the Right to Take Possession distinct from Foreclosure?
The Right may be: * **Applied** to **all types** of Security; * Used for means **other than** a **sale**; and * Exercised **without court involvement**; ## Footnote Lecture Notes.
74
What is the Commercial Utility of the Right to Take Possession?
It provides **control** over what is to be **done** with the **asset**. ## Footnote Lecture Notes.
75
What is the Application of Cash Balances?
If the asset is a **bank account** or a **beneficial interest** therein, it is the **appropriation** thereof. ## Footnote P. 994; *Re Bank of Credit* [1998] AC 214.