Session 9 - An Introduction to EEG and Event-Related Potentials Flashcards
(26 cards)
Advantages
- high temporal resolution (ms range)
- non-invasive, few exclusion criteria
- portable (TU is developing one to walk with)
- relatively cheap
- all age groups
Disavantages
- poor spatial resolution
- noisy signal
Neural source of EEG
–> hypothesised
= postsynaptic potentials at apical dendrites of synchronised neocortical pyramidal cells
Dipole:
- net negativity at axon from presynaptic cells + dendrites
- net positivity at soma
–> generator of EEG = electrical dipoles
- chemical signal transmission at synapses (between neurons)
- electrical signal transmission within neurons
Cortex:
- in the stimulated region of the cortex: many tiny dipoles sum up to create equivalent current dipole
Pyramidal cells
- create the postsynaptic potentials measured in EEG
electrical signals can be measured at the scalp
- dipole orientation and structure determines the scalp topography
BUT:
- scalp topographies do not directly indicate the location of the source –> especially in the case of multiple dipoles
The 10-20 system
- electrodes are usually mounted in electrode cap following the 10-20 system
–> placement of electrodes is independent of head size and comparable across labs - sectioning in frontal, temporal, central, parietal, and occipital
Recording the EEG
we require:
- a stimulation computer
- EEG cap and participant
- filters & amplifiers
- digitisation computer
Artefacts
- blinks
- movements/muscle activity
- eye movements
- sweat sway
Data preprocessing
Steps (usually included):
- re-referencing
- blink correction
- filtering
- artefact rejection
main goal = clean the raw signal by
- substracting systematic artefacts (e.g blinks)
- filtering frequencies irrelevant to the research question
- rejecting data epochs with unsystematic artefacts (e.g. muscle activity, slow drifts)
- specific parameters of pre-processing depend on the analyses method (e.g. event-related potentials, time-frequency analyses)
Quantifying the EEG signal
- ERP components –> time domain
- frequency analyses/time-frequency analyses –> frequency domain
- sources –> source domain
Other parameters and approaches include:
- use of single-trial data, e.g.
–> trial-by-trial covariation with reaction times
–> MVPA analyses of single trial activations
–> general problem: high levels of noise
Event-related potentials
= activation related to an external (visual, auditory, tactile) stimulus
- ERPs inform about the time course of stimulus processing
- different components are linked to different processing steps - from sensory perception to higher-order cognition
- time course of experimental effects informs about neural architecture, e.g. top-down influence on sensory processing
Example: processing of emotional compared to neutral facial expressions
- presenting fearful, happy and neutral faces (~30-40 per condition)
- recording continuous EEG
Example EEG Experiment
- faces are presented, e.g, x = neutral, o = positive
- data is saved continuously (500 Hz)
- event code (trigger) is saved at the time of stimulus onset
Segementation
- after pre-processing: continuous data is cut into epochs around stimulus onset (identified by triggers), e.g. -100-1000ms
- triggers inform about onset and experimental conditions (e.g. a 1 is sent with every happy face, a 2 with every neutral face, etc)
ERP-analysis
Averaging
- after segmentation –> (ideally) we have 30-40 segments for each experimental condition, cut around the onset of the words
- segments are then average for each condition in order to remove noise
–> random noise has a higher amplitude than activity related to stimulus processing
–> assumption that noise is random and cancels out through averaging
- averaging increses the signal to noise ratio
Disadvantage: loss of signal-trial information
ERP components
- are linked to specific processing step of a stimulus
–> P1 reflects first positive deflection (in visual processing in the extrastriate visual cortex)
–> N170 reflects structural face encoding - knowledge is based on combinations with other techniques like fMRI and PET, and confirmed by source analyses
ERP: P1
- can be first positive amplitude or P100
- preak ~ 100ms after the onset of a visual stimulus
- reflects perceptual processing generated in the extrastriate visual cortex
- attention allocation increases P1 amplitudes
ERP: C1
- first component (positive or negative)
–> sounds stupid but was invented to describe the first amplitude change before P1/N1 - difficult to distinguish this from random activity
Early components
- within ~200ms after stimulus onset
- mainly reflect sensory responses of the visual cortex and are highly influenced by physical stimulus properties
- can also be modulated by emotion, mood, attention, reward, etc
Late components
- after 300ms
- relfect internal, higher-order processing
- not strongly dependent on physical stimulus properties
- influenced by task, strategy, emotionl processing, etc.
Statistical analyses
- averages are calculated for every condition, separately for every subject
- ERP components of interest are quatified based on previous literature
–> eg P1 component: activation from 100-200ms after stimulus onset at occipital electrodes - values for each condition and each participant are entered into statistcial analyses (F-tests, t-tests, linear mixed models)
Time frequency analyses
- EEG signal consists of a sum of simple sine waves of different frequencies
- frequency: number of events per unit time
- 1Hz: 1 cycle per second
Examples:
- alpha rhythm: 8-13Hz –> 8-13 oscillations per second
- sampling rate of EEG = 500Hz –> 500 data points per second, one sample every 2ms
Frequencies: Fourier Transform
- EEG signal: sum of sine waves of different frequencies
- transformation from time domain to frequency domain by mathematical transformaiton (Fourier Transform)
–> allows for quantifying the contributions of different rhythms to the EEG signal
–> can be statistically compared across conditions
Problem:
- assumption of stationarity (the frequency composition does not change across time)
Spontaneous rhythms in EEG
Gamma:
- 30 - 100Hz
- network binding of cognitive/motor function
Beta:
- 14 - 30Hz
- alert state
Alpha:
- 8 - 13Hz
- drowsiness
Theta:
- 5 - 7Hz
- sleep
Delta:
- 1 - 4 Hz
- deep sleep
- frequency bands are also related to specific cognitive functions, e.g. attention, perception, motor preparation, memory
Source Analyses
Aim:
- localising the sources (dipole technique) of electro-cortical activity
Why not fMRI?
- because of EEG’s superior temporal resolution
- goal is to localise the sources of activation at specific processing steps
Source estimation involves two steps:
- creating a forward model of brain activation
- estimating sources using the forward model