Short table Flashcards

1
Q

Potential Defendants for INC case

A
  1. Credit Bureaus
  2. Credit Furnishers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Subtypes of INC case

A

A: Inaccurate and misleading
1. Balance reported inaccurately
2. False late payment
3. Delinquency reported more than 7,5 years
4. Duplicated account

B: Technically accurate but materially misleading
1. bill covered by the insurance but not paid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Proof for INC cases

A
  1. Proof of payment or equivalent documents
  2. Credit Reports
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

CRA culpability for INC cases

A

After the 30th day from the delivery date of the dispute letter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Proof of Harm for INC cases

A

Required after the CRA’s culpability has been established

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Potential Defendandts for IDT cases

A
  1. Credit Bureaus
  2. Credit Furnishers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Subtypes of IDT case

A
  1. Fraudulent accounts opened.
  2. Unauthorized charges on an existing account.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Main Proof for IDT cases

A
  1. Merchant Call
  2. FTC Identity Theft
  3. Credit Report
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

CRA culpability for IDT cases

A

After the 30th day from the delivery date of the block letter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Proof of harm for IDT cases

A

Required after the CRA’s culpability has been established

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Potential Defendands for Mixed File Cases.

A

Credit Bureaus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Proof for Mixed File cases

A
  1. Merchant Call
  2. Credit Reports
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

CRA culpability for the Mixed Case files

A

From the get-go.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Proof of harm for Mixed File cases

A

Required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Potential defendands for Deceased cases.

A

Credit Bureaus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Proof dor Deceased Cases

A
  1. SSA Benefits Letter
  2. Adverse Action Notice (with a ‘deceased’ notation on it)
  3. Consumer reports (with a ‘deceased’ notation on it)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

CRA’s culpability in the Deceased Cases

A

From the get-go most of the time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Proof of harm for Deceased cases

19
Q

Potential Defendants for BG cases

A
  1. Background screening companies.
  2. Tenance screening companies.
20
Q

Subtypes of BG cases

A
  1. Unrecognized criminal records/evictions.
  2. Innacurate infromation about charges/evictions.
21
Q

Main proof for BG cases

A
  1. Adverse Action Notice
  2. Background report
22
Q

CRA culpability in BG cases

A

From the get-go most of the time.

23
Q

Proof of harm for BG cases

24
Q

Potential defendants for Post Bankruptcy cases

A

Credit Bureaus

25
Subtypes of Post-Bankruptcy cases
1. 1681 e (b) 2. 1681 (i)
26
Proof for Post-Bankruptcy cases
1. Bankrutpcy discharge. 2. Bankruptcy Schedules 3. Credit Reports
27
CRA's culpability for Post Bankruptcy cases
1. 1681 e (b) - from the get-go 2. 1681 (i) - after 30 days of sending the dipsute letter.
28
Proof of harm for Post Bankruptcy cases
1. 1681 e (b) - required 2. 1681 (i) - required after CRA's culpability is established.
29
Potential defendants for FDCPA cases
Debt Collectors
30
Subtypes of FDCPA cases
1. Call Frequency Violations 2. Call Placement Violations 3. Collection Letter Violations 4. Collection Email Violations 5. Collection Text Message Violations 6. Collection Consumer Reporting Violations. 7. Abusive Language.
31
Proof for FDCPA cases
1. Copies of written communications. 2. Call recordings. 3. Screenshots with call history. 4. Credit Reports
32
DCA culpability for FDCPA cases
From the date of the violation.
33
Proof of harm for the FDCPA cases
Not required
34
Potential defendants for TCPA cases
1. Telemarketers. 2. Other companies placing unauthorized calls.
35
Proof for TCPA cases
1. Call recordings. 2. Screenshots withe the call history. 3. Voicemails 4. Text messages. 5. Emails
36
Creditor's culpability in a TCPA case
After the request to stop contact was placed by the consumer
37
Proof of harm in a TCPA case
n/a
38
Potential defendants for FCBA cases
Creditors
39
Proof for FCBA cases
1. Account Statement 2. Proof of written dispute. 3. CMR
40
Creditor's culpability in a FCBA case
After the 30th day from the delivery date of the dispute + two billing cycles after that;
41
Potential defendants for EFTA cases
Debit/checking/savings account providers
42
Proof for EFTA cases
1. Account Statement. 2. Proof of written dispute. 3. CMR.
43
Creditor's culpability for EFTA cases
After the 30th day from the delivery date of the dispute + two billing cycles after that;