SIGN Glaucoma Flashcards

1
Q

Components of a glaucoma referral

A
  • history
  • iop
  • CCT
  • AC assessment
  • VF
  • disc assessment
  • imaging
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When to refer based on IOP results

A
  • > 25mmHg irrespective of of CCT
  • 21-25 and CCT <555nm and aged under 65
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When to refer based on anterior chamber assessment

A
  • refer if gonio shows 270 degrees or more of the angle the trabecular mesh work if not visible
  • VH angle with less than 1/4 thickness of the cornea
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What to look for when checking anterior chamber

A
  • Pseudoexfoliation
  • pigment dispersion
  • iridotomy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Considerations when referringbased on visual fields

A
  • minimum of 2 visual field tests with consistent findings
  • is there a defect
  • does it match disc appearance
  • use same equipment
  • has the mean defect changed by more than 2db
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When should px be referred based on disc assessment

A
  • px with one or more of the following findings should be referred to
    • optic disc haemorrhage
    • disc asymmetry (difference of 0.2 CD)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When to refer summary

A

Irrespective of intraocular pressure, patients with one or more of the following findings should be referred to secondary eye care services”
• Optic disc signs consistent with glaucoma in either eye
• A reproducible visual field defect consistent with glaucoma • Risk of angle closure
• Using Van Herricks technique, a peripheral angle with of less than a quarter of the corneal thickness
• Using Gonioscopy, when posterior trabecular meshwork is not visible for ≥ 270 degrees”
• “IOP is >26mmHg - irrespective of CCT”
• “IOP 21-26, central corneal thickness is <555μmand patient is aged under

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Limitations of DDLS

A
  • poorer at monitoring diffuse NRR loss
  • doesn’t work well with unusual discs
  • monitors thinnest areas, but if focal loss occurs elsewhere then grade may not change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Benefit of slit lamp for disc assessment

A
  • better field of view
  • better illumination
  • stereoscopic view
  • easier to navigate the fundus
  • image size less effected by refractive error
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Steps of a disc assessment

A
  • assess disc size
  • narrowest rim to disc
  • scrutinise where the neuro retinal rim ends around the whole disc
  • judge cup on bend of vessels
  • look for glaucomatous disc features
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Advantages of DDLS

A
  • good repeatability
  • strong correlation with glaucomatous visual fields
  • better specificity than cup to disc
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Corrective factor for 90D lens

A

X 1.30
- 1.1- 1.5 M is medium disc on 90D lens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly