Slides Chapter 10 Flashcards

1
Q

Distribution Provisions: Rights of Beneficiaries

Overview of Distribution Provisions

A

What is the standard?
Guiding principle will be the settlor’s intent
Look to language of trust and all other evidence of intent at time of execution
Distinction between mandatory and discretionary distributions
Spray (discretion among beneficiaries) or sprinkle
(discretion re: a single beneficiary) distributions
Who are the beneficiaries and what are their rights:
to income?
to principal/corpus during trust administration?
to property (remainder) on termination?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ascertainable vs. Nonascertainable Standards

A

Ascertainable: Health, Education, Maintenance, Support (HEMS) and likely Emergency and Hardship - Terms of this type are considered objective and quantifiable.

Nonascertainable: Comfort, Happiness, Welfare, Best interests - Terms of this type lack objective quality and are less quantifiable.

No standard: In trustee’s absolute/sole/unfettered discretion, for any purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Interpreting Discretionary Standards of Distribution

Judicial Review of Trustee’s Exercise of Discretion: Reasonableness and Good Faith

A

UTC §814. Discretionary Powers

Notwithstanding the breadth of discretion granted to a trustee in the terms of the trust, including the use of such terms as “absolute”, “sole”, or “uncontrolled”, the trustee shall exercise a discretionary power IN GOOD FAITH AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PURPOSES OF THE TRUST AND THE INTERESTS OF [ALL] THE BENEFICIARIES.

So what is required of the trustee is to act in good faith and in accordance with the terms and purposes of the trust and the interests of [all] the beneficiaries. Courts will review a trustee’s decision for reasonableness and/or good faith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Is Trustee Given Discretion & How Broad?

A

Rest. (3d) Trusts §50

A settlor may manifest an intention to grant the trustee greater than ordinary latitude in exercising discretionary judgment. How does such an intention affect the duty of the trustee and the role of the court?

… words such as “absolute” or “unlimited” or “sole and uncontrolled” are not interpreted literally. Even under the broadest grant of fiduciary discretion, a trustee must act honestly and in a state of mind contemplated by the settlor. Thus, the court will not permit the trustee to act in bad faith or for some purpose or motive other than to accomplish the purposes of the discretionary power or from failing to act, either arbitrarily or from a misunderstanding of the trustee’s duty or authority.

Within these limits, it is a matter of interpretation to ascertain the degree to which the settlor’s use of language of extended (e.g., “absolute”) discretion manifests an intention to relieve the trustee of normal judicial supervision and control in the exercise of a discretionary power over trust distributions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Support and Maintenance

A

Restatement (3d) (Trusts) §50

d(2). Support or maintenance. The terms “support” and “maintenance” are normally construed as synonyms, even when this treats the terms as redundant.

  • Means more than the bare essentials for a beneficiary.
  • Ordinarily entitles a beneficiary to distributions sufficient for accustomed living expenses, extending to such items as regular mortgage payments, property taxes, suitable health insurance or care, existing programs of life and property insurance, and continuation of accustomed patterns of vacation and of charitable and family giving.
  • Reasonable additional comforts or “luxuries” that are within the means of many individuals of like station in life, such as a special vacation of a type the beneficiary had never before taken, may be borderline as entitlements but would normally be within the permissible range of the trustee’s judgment, even without benefit of a grant of extended discretion .
  • Covers not only the beneficiary’s own support but also that of persons for whom provision is customarily made, such as the support of members of the beneficiary’s household and the costs of suitable education for the beneficiary’s children.

Does not normally encompass payments that contribute to a beneficiary’s contentment or happiness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Defining Health

A

Rest. (3d) Trusts §50
Without more, references to “health,” “medical care,” and the like in the terms of a discretionary power may be useful to inform beneficiary expectations or guide an inexperienced trustee, but presumptively they provide merely for health and medical benefits like those normally implied by a support standard.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Accustomed Standard of Living

A

Rest. (3d) Trusts §50

  • Unless the trust explicitly says otherwise, support and maintenance are understood to be based on accustomed standard of living.
  • The accustomed manner of living for these purposes is ordinarily that enjoyed by the beneficiary, increased to compensate at the time of the settlor’s death or at the time an irrevocable trust is created for inflation and to meet subsequent increases in the beneficiary’s needs resulting, for example, from deteriorating health or from added burdens appropriately assumed for the needs of another.
  • May also increase if a beneficiary becomes accustomed over time to a higher standard of living if consistent with the trust’s level of productivity and not inconsistent with an apparent priority among beneficiaries or other purpose of the settlor.
  • A lower level of distributions may be justifiable if the trust estate is modest relative to the probable future needs of the beneficiary.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Education

A

Rest. (3d) Trusts §50

The term “education,” without elaboration, is ordinarily construed as extending to payment of living expenses as well as fees and other costs of attending an institution of higher education, or the beneficiary’s pursuit of a program of trade or technical training assuming adequate trust funds available for the purpose.
Absent clear statements in the trust to the contrary, related costs for education, such as for private primary school, study abroad programs and music lessons or sports instruction, are less likely than those above to be viewed as within the term “education.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Emergency

A

Restrictive standard; objective vs. “personal” emergency

In re Tone’s Estate definition of Emergency: “a sudden or unexpected happening which calls for immediate action.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Beneficiary’s Other Assets

A

Restatement (3d) (Trusts) §50
Is trustee, in determining the distributions to be made to a beneficiary under an objective standard (such as a support standard),
(i) required to take account of the beneficiary’s other resources,
(ii) prohibited from doing so, or
(iii) to consider the other resources but has some discretion in the matter.

If the trust provisions do not address the question, the general rule of construction presumes [this] …

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Welfare, Best Interests, Happiness

A

Rest. (3d) Trusts §50

These terms tend also to authorize discretionary expenditures that fall beyond the usual scope of a purely support-related standard. For example, a “benefit” standard might make it reasonable for a trustee to make substantial distributions to provide a beneficiary with capital needed to start a business.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Happiness

A

Rest. (3rd) Trusts §50
Such language suggests an intention that the trustee’s judgment be exercised generously and without relatively objective limitation.
The primary effect of such a term is to immunize from challenge by remainder beneficiaries almost any reasonably affordable distributions.
This, however, does not mean that the trustee cannot properly resist any reasonable request by the beneficiary, because the decision remains one within the fiduciary discretion of the trustee.

Very broad, not ascertainable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Duty to Inquire

A

Restatement (3d) (Trusts) §50

The trustee has an affirmative duty to act in a reasonable manner in attempting to ascertain the beneficiary’s needs and, under the usual rule of construction, other resources that may be appropriately and reasonably available for purposes relevant to the discretionary power.
The trustee generally may rely on the beneficiary’s representations and on readily available, minimally intrusive information requested of the beneficiary. This reliance is inappropriate, however, when the trustee has reason to suspect that the information thus supplied is inaccurate or incomplete. . . .
Trustees entitled to discovery of beneficiary’s financial statements and may require beneficiary to disclose other sources of income. In fact, it may be an abuse of discretion not to inquire into financial circumstances of all discretionary distributees before making payments to one.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

May/Should a Court Intervene and When?

A

Rest. (3rd ) Trusts §50
A discretionary power conferred upon the trustee to determine the benefits of a trust beneficiary is subject to judicial control only to prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the discretion by the trustee.

Bad faith, arbitrary, or failure to act when action required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is required in performing due diligence?

A

The overriding responsibility is to consider the intent of settlor and purpose of trust.

To do a proper job, trustee must consider:

The standards stated in the trust and how they should be applied here. Additional directions given by the settlor in the trust, a letter or otherwise may be used. Trustee should try to decide what the settlor would have done if s/he were deciding? If standards are ascertainable, then discretion is more circumscribed.

The standard of living of the beneficiaries the settlor wishes the trust to benefit, with concern for the needs of all beneficiaries, current and future, adjusted for changed circumstances and mindful of whether any beneficiary was meant to be of first importance. If trustee is also a beneficiary, greater scrutiny for abuse is appropriate. Trustee should be pro-active in determining needs of beneficiaries and may ask for financials.

The extent to which resources are available to beneficiaries from outside the trust and whether they are to be taken into account, including being careful not to disqualify beneficiary from public benefits, like Medicaid.

Previous actions and decisions made by settlor with respect to this or similar situations or family members.

The size of the trust relative to the possible distribution, including whether there is enough to help requesting beneficiary and others who may make a request later.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Recap - Trustee Duties re: Discretion

A

Unless the trust gives specific direction otherwise, the trustee has the duty to perform “due diligence” to determine who all the beneficiaries are & their needs as they pertain to the criteria for distribution. (Trustee may request financial statements to accomplish this task.) The settlor’s intent is the guiding principle. Normally, need is based on the beneficiary’s accustomed standard of living at the time the beneficiary’s interest ripens and usually includes a consideration of other resources.

Once having gathered the facts and determined needs, it is within the discretion of the trustee to decide what to do. The size of the trust relative to the needs of present and future beneficiaries is relevant. If due diligence is performed properly, courts generally will leave the final decision to the trustee so long as the determination is not (i) clearly erroneous or unreasonable, (ii) an abuse of discretion and capricious, or (iii) favors one set of beneficiaries over others, esp. where the trustee is also a beneficiary. But without the due diligence, any decision may be considered arbitrary.

For example, if the standard is to provide for the support of the beneficiary, it is up to trustee to determine if the beneficiary needs money and what kind of support settlor would have wished to fund, but then decide whether to do so and in what amount. If the decision of the trustee is “in the ballpark,” the court will not get involved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Rights of Creditors and Planning to Protect the Assets of a Trust

A

Is your client vulnerable? If not, then normal estate planning techniques are probably adequate for settlor but maybe not for other beneficiaries.

Concern is for property in the trust for Settlor and Beneficiaries from claims by:
Patients
Contractors
Divorcing (predator) spouses – property settlement, child support and alimony
Injured party due to negligence
Anyone in today’s litigious society with ever-increasing jury awards
Also consider Special Needs Trust planning for government benefits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Creditors of a Beneficiary Who Is Not the Settlor

A

Remember that creditors of non-settlor beneficiaries of revocable trust cannot obtain anything since beneficiary only has an expectancy

A court may not allow a creditor to garnish a distribution if the beneficiary can establish the money is needed for her basic living costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

mandatory distribution

A

A creditor of a beneficiary may compel a mandatory distribution (if not subject to a spendthrift clause) and get a court order to attach present or future mandatory distributions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

discretionary distributions

A

A creditor of a beneficiary may NOT compel a discretionary distribution or get a court order to attach present or future discretionary distributions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Spendthrift Clauses

A

UTC §501 - RIGHTS OF BENEFICIARY’S CREDITOR

To the extent a beneficiary’s interest is not subject to a spendthrift provision, the court may authorize a creditor or assignee of the beneficiary to reach the beneficiary’s interest by [writ of] attachment of present or future distributions to or for the benefit of the beneficiary or other means.

Read in reverse, if the interest IS subject to a spendthrift clause, a court may NOT issue a writ to trustee to make distribution payments directly to creditor. The creditor will have to go after the property once it is in the hands of the beneficiary. Note that this section, at least, does not differentiate between mandatory and discretionary distributions; so if there is no spendthrift provision, a writ of attachment is possible for both.

22
Q

UTC §502 - SPENDTHRIFT PROVISION

A

(a) A spendthrift provision is valid only if it restrains both voluntary and involuntary transfer of a beneficiary’s interest.
(b) A term of a trust providing that the interest of a beneficiary is held subject to a “spendthrift trust,” or words of similar import, is sufficient to restrain both voluntary and involuntary transfer of the beneficiary’s interest.
(c) A beneficiary may not transfer an interest in a trust in violation of a valid spendthrift provision and, except as otherwise provided in this [article – specifically section 503], a creditor or assignee of the beneficiary may not reach the interest or a distribution by the trustee before its receipt by the beneficiary.

“No beneficiary shall have any right to anticipate, sell, assign, mortgage, pledge, or otherwise dispose of or encumber all or any part of any trust estate established for his or her benefit under this agreement. No part of such trust estate, including income, shall be liable for the debts or obligations of any beneficiary or be subject to attachment, garnishment, execution, creditor’s bill, or other legal or equitable process.”

23
Q

Present & Future Creditors of Non-Settlor Beneficiary

No Spendthrift Clause

A

Creditor CAN get a court to issue a writ of attachment or garnishment respecting present & future distributions, whether mandatory or discretionary, to or for benefit of beneficiary to the extent not otherwise exempt.

24
Q

Present & Future Creditors of Non-Settlor Beneficiary

With Spendthrift Clause

A

Creditor CANNOT get a court to issue a writ of attachment or garnishment respecting present & future distributions, whether mandatory (unless overdue) or discretionary. Creditor will have to wait until distribution and then have sheriff serve levy on beneficiary

25
Supercreditors | UTC §503 - EXCEPTIONS TO SPENDTHRIFT PROVISION
(b) A spendthrift provision is unenforceable against [the following super/exception creditors]: (1) a beneficiary’s child, spouse, or former spouse who has a judgment or court order against the beneficiary for support or maintenance; (2) a judgment creditor who has provided services for the protection of a beneficiary’s interest in the trust; and (3) a claim of this State or the United States to the extent a statute of this State or federal law so provides.  (c) A claimant against which a spendthrift provision cannot be enforced may obtain from a court an order [writ] attaching present or future distributions to or for the benefit of the beneficiary. The court may limit the award to such relief as is appropriate under the circumstances.
26
Supercreditors | UTC §504 - DISCRETIONARY TRUSTS
(c) To the extent a trustee has not complied with a standard of distribution [such as for the beneficiary’s support] or has abused a discretion: (1) a distribution may be ordered by the court [i.e. compelled] to satisfy a judgment or court order…for support or maintenance of the beneficiary’s child, spouse, or former spouse…
27
Revocable Trusts
Property in a revocable trust is treated as the functional equivalent of settlor’s ownership. Only irrevocable trusts may offer asset protection for settlor. Therefore, present and future creditors of settlor (incl. trustee in bankruptcy) can attach property in a revocable trust regardless of standards of distribution. By contrast, creditors of non-settlor beneficiaries cannot get order to attach distributions or assets because beneficiaries only have expectancy
28
Future Creditors of Settlor/Beneficiary of | Revocable Trust
Creditors can attach property of revocable trust during settlor’s life and from estate
29
Present Creditors of Settlor/Beneficiary of | Revocable Trust
Creditors can attach property of revocable trust during settlor’s life and from estate under either UTC 505 or UFCA/UFTA
30
Present Creditors of Non-Settlor Beneficiary of | Revocable Trust
No rights until distributed– mere expectancy (or interest too contingent)
31
Future Creditors of Non-Settlor Beneficiary of | Revocable Trust
No rights until distributed– mere expectancy (or interest too contingent)
32
Irrevocable Trusts
For present creditors, Uniform Fraudulent Conveyances Act (UFCA) or Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act (UFTA) may apply if actual or constructive fraud For future creditors of settlor who is also a beneficiary, no protection even if distributions are subject to trustee’s discretion or to a spendthrift clause Possible exceptions: Foreign Asset Protection Trusts Domestic Asset Protection Trusts (DAPT)
33
Present Creditors of Settlor of an Irrevocable Trust
Creditors can attach property of trust either per UTC 505 or UFCA/UFTA whether settlor is a beneficiary or not
34
Future Creditors of Settlor of an Irrevocable Trust
If settlor is not a beneficiary and has not retained any control or interest, settlor doesn’t own anything and his/her creditors have nothing to attach. BUT - It is a preference in bankruptcy, so subject to 90-day or one-year avoidance. If settlor is a beneficiary, creditors may reach the maximum amount that the trustee could pay the settlor/beneficiary. UTC 505. [For example, if the trustee has discretion to distribute the entire income and principal to the settlor, the effect of this subsection is to place the settlor’s creditors in the same position as if the trust had not been created.]
35
Asset Protection Trusts – Foreign and Domestic
Alaska provides for “self-settled” spendthrift trusts which allow the grantor to set up an irrevocable trust, be a discretionary beneficiary and avoid having the assets be subject to claims of future creditors of either the grantor or other beneficiary. Alaska has no special “class” of creditors (like former spouses, children, tort claimants) which, unlike the laws of other states, would permit those creditors to attach the assets of the trust. Alaska allows creditors to attach trust assets in a self-settled trust upon proving actual fraud only (i.e., not "constructive" fraud). No RAP, so dynasty/perpetual trusts permitted Beneficiary does not have a property right in his or her beneficial interest of a discretionary trust but, rather, has a mere expectancy. Therefore, creditors of a beneficiary have no legal interest to attach. A trustee may directly pay the expenses of a beneficiary of a discretionary trust.  Creditors cannot seek a court order to attach trust assets or distributions nor can they obtain a court order to compel the trustee to make a distribution to the creditor. Offshore trusts offer the additional advantages of lack of recognition of foreign judgments and difficulty of recovery. If gifts are made to a “self-settled” trust or “similar device” with intent to defraud past or future creditors, a bankruptcy trustee can set aside any transfer made within last ten years!
36
Summary re: Settlor’s Debts | Existing creditors:
Under no circumstances will transfers of property to a trust protect the settlor/debtor from the claims of existing creditors, whether the trust is revocable or irrevocable. UFTA/UFCA/UVTA.
37
Summary re: Settlor’s Debts | Future Creditors:
For a settlor who retains an interest in the trust, there is limited or no protection. It does not matter whether the trust contains a spendthrift provision or not. (i) With respect to a revocable trust, the settlor’s creditors may get a court order attaching all the property of the trust both during the lifetime of the settlor and from his/her estate. (ii) With respect to an irrevocable trust, the settlor’s creditors may get a court order attaching the maximum amount that can be distributed to or for the settlor’s benefit. UTC 505. (a) However, if the settlor transferred all his/her interests in the property into an irrevocable trust and retained no rights to either the income or the property of the trust, the settlor’s future creditors may not look to the trust to satisfy debts any more than they could go after a gift in fee simple made to a child several years before the debt arose.
38
Termination of trusts in general
A trust terminates when it expires pursuant to its terms, or no purpose of the trust remains to be achieved (UTC 410), e.g. on death of spouse and after distribution of property to kids when terms of trust state: Income to spouse for life, remainder to kids
39
Modification and Termination of Revocable Trusts
The UTC presumes a trust is a revocable trust (not an irrevocable trust) when it is silent. A revocable trust may be revoked by: (1) substantial compliance with a method provided in the trust (which may be made exclusive); or (2) a later will or codicil that expressly refers to the trust or specifically devises property that would otherwise be subject to the trust; or (3) any other method manifesting clear and convincing evidence of the settlor’s intent.
40
What happens when a conservator/agent acting pursuant to Power of Attorney seeks to revoke or amend a revocable trust? (UTC 602)
Express authorization for agent in trust or POA Otherwise needs court approval
41
An irrevocable trust is less likely to need modification if it already includes terms allowing it to respond to changes in circumstances, such as:
Broad discretionary powers Thorough definitions Trust protectors Removal and replacement powers
42
Assuming trust is not explicit but everyone – settlor, trustee and all beneficiaries - consents to modify or terminate the trust?
Seems this should be permitted. UTC 411 concurs. However, tax concerns generally prevent this power from being reserved to settlor in the trust instrument. It may be viewed as too much control over the property or distribution rights and bring trust back into settlor’s taxable estate. That said, if taxes are not of concern to settlor, this is the most efficient way to modify/terminate a trust.
43
UTC §411- MODIFICATION OR TERMINATION OF TRUSTS
(a) A noncharitable irrevocable trust may be modified or terminated upon consent of the settlor and all beneficiaries, even if the modification or termination is inconsistent with a material purpose of the trust.
44
Modification or Termination without Settlor’s Consent
It is available only if consistent with or helpful in carrying out the purposes of the trust. Notice that all of these require a court to approve of the change. Not allowed unless not inconsistent with material purpose and all beneficiaries consent Settlor cannot write into the trust that court approval is not needed and instead leave it to the trustee or a protector (or all the qualified beneficiaries or all income beneficiaries) under UTC and some states. Consider UTC 105(b), which says, “The terms of a trust prevail over any provision of this [Code] except: … (4) the power of the court to modify or terminate a trust under Sections 410 through 416.
45
Claflin “Material Purpose” Doctrine
“[A] testator has a right to dispose of his own property with such restrictions and limitations, not repugnant to law, as he sees fit, and … his intentions ought to be carried out, unless they contravene some positive rule of law, or are against public policy. … It cannot be said that these restrictions upon the plaintiff’s possession and control of the property are altogether useless, for there is not the same danger that he will spend the property while it is in the hands of the trustees as there would be if it were in his own.”
46
Claflin Doctrine Would modification or termination of the trust be inconsistent with or contrary to one of the material purposes of the trust?
If so, then unlikely the court will allow modification. UTC 411(b). If not, then modification likely if the majority of beneficiaries are in agreement. Dissenting beneficiaries must be made whole. UTC 411(c).
47
UTC §412. MODIFICATION OR TERMINATION BECAUSE OF | UNANTICIPATED [CHANGED] CIRCUMSTANCES OR INABILITY TO ADMINISTER TRUST EFFECTIVELY.
  (a) [On petition of trustee or beneficiaries] The court may modify the ADMINISTRATIVE or DISPOSITIVE terms of a trust or terminate the trust if, BECAUSE OF CIRCUMSTANCES NOT ANTICIPATED BY THE SETTLOR, MODIFICATION OF TERMINATION WILL FURTHER THE PURPOSES OF THE TRUST. To the extent practicable, the modification must be made in accordance with the settlor’s probable intention. (b) The court may modify the ADMINISTRATIVE terms of a trust IF CONTINUATION OF THE TRUST ON ITS EXISTING TERMS WOULD BE IMPRACTICABLE OR WASTEFUL OR IMPAIR THE TRUST'S ADMINISTRATION. Generally referred to as “equitable deviation.” Contrast UTC 411, which requires the consent of all beneficiaries but does not depend on a finding of unanticipated or changed circumstances. Usually involves changed circumstances but it is sufficient that the settlor was unaware of the circumstances in establishing the terms of the trust.
48
Other Modification Circumstances
Overriding concern is whether any modification or termination likely furthers the purposes of the trust or is inconsistent with them. Assuming it furthers purposes, then any modification or termination should be in accordance with settlor’s probable intent. - Court may order reformation to fix mistake - UTC 415 - After notice to qualified beneficiaries, trustee may terminate trust when it drops below certain value (UTC 414 = $50,000) - Court may modify to achieve tax objectives (prospectively and/or retroactively - UTC 416 - After notice to qualified beneficiaries, trustee may combine or divide trusts if no adverse effect on beneficiaries or purpose of trust - UTC 417
49
Consider Protectors to Modify/Terminate UTC §808. POWER TO DIRECT.
(a) While a trust is revocable, the trustee may follow a direction of the settlor that is contrary to the terms of the trust. (beneficiary) If the terms of a trust confer upon a person other than the settlor of a revocable trust power to direct certain actions of the trustee, the trustee shall act in accordance with an exercise of the power unless the attempted exercise is manifestly contrary to the terms of the trust or the trustee knows the attempted exercise would constitute a serious breach of a fiduciary duty that the person holding the power owes to the beneficiaries of the trust. (c) THE TERMS OF A TRUST MAY CONFER UPON A TRUSTEE OR OTHER PERSON A POWER TO DIRECT THE MODIFICATION OR TERMINATION OF THE TRUST. (d) A PERSON, OTHER THAN A BENEFICIARY, WHO HOLDS A POWER TO DIRECT IS PRESUMPTIVELY A FIDUCIARY who, as such, is required to act in good faith with regard to the purposes of the trust and the interests of the beneficiaries. The holder of a power to direct is liable for any loss that results from breach of a fiduciary duty.
50
UTC §505 - CREDITOR’S CLAIM AGAINST SETTLOR
(a) Whether or not [aka Even if] the terms of a trust contain a spendthrift provision, the following rules apply: (1) During the lifetime of the settlor, the PROPERTY of a REVOCABLE trust is subject to claims of the settlor’s creditors. (2) With respect to an IRREVOCABLE trust, a creditor or assignee of the settlor may reach the maximum amount that can be distributed to or for the settlor’s benefit. … (“the rule against self-settled spendthrift trusts”) (3) AFTER THE DEATH OF A SETTLOR…, the property of a trust that was revocable at the settlor’s death is subject to claims of the settlor’s creditors, [etc.] … to the extent the settlor’s probate estate is inadequate to satisfy those claims, costs, [and] expenses. Therefore a creditor can attach the assets by levy, etc. while in the trust and not have to wait for a distribution or try to compel a distribution JUST AS IF THERE WAS NO TRUST. Therefore the assets while in the trust can be attached, but only to the extent of the amount the settlor is entitled to under the trust terms. For example, if settlor entitled to income or principal as needed per trustee’s discretion, then settlor entitled to everything for these purposes.
51
Decanting Statutes
Process of transferring trust assets into a new trust with different terms pursuant to power of appointment. New Uniform Trust Decanting Act (UTDA) as of July 2016. Can be authorized by terms of trust or, if not, by statute. Common law also provides basis as consistent with power of appointment Authority to decant depends on authority of trustee – the more discretion, the easier vs. subject to ascertainable standards, which is more restrictive