social categorisation Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

what is personal identity

A

personality characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is social identity

A

groups you are a member of

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is a category

A

collections of instances that have a family resemblance organised around a prototype.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are prototypes

A

cognitive representation of typical defining features of a category.
- standards against which family resemblance is assessed and category membership decided

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what did Rosch say about categories

A

they are not rigid but fuzzy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

why do we categorise

A
  • save cognitive energy
  • clarifies and refines perception of the world
  • maintain a positive self esteem
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are some common group distinctions

A
  • sexual orientation
  • profession
  • age
  • race
  • class
  • employment status
  • nationality
  • immigrant status
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is illusory correlation in terms of stereotypes

A
  • negative stereotypes may occur when people inaccurately pair minority groups with negative events/behaviours because they are both distinct
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what did Hamilton and Sherman find about illusory correlation stereotyping

A
  • asked white american pps to estimate the arrest rate of various types of americans
  • african americans were estimated to have higher arrest rates than they did
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the effects of stereotyping

A
  • behaviour assimilation-stereotypes don’t just influence our perceptions of others, they can influence our own behaviour
  • stereotype threat - can lead to poor performance
  • prejudice and discrimination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what task was used by Bargh et al to investigate behaviour assimilation

A

the scrambled sentence task - making sentences out of randomly ordered words
- 2 conditions - words associated with elderly and neutral words unrelated to age
- measured how long it took them to leave the room after

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what were the results of the scrambled word task

A
  • pps primed with elderly words behaved in a way related to an elderly stereotype - moved more slow to leave the room
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the issue with bargh’s scrambled word task

A
  • often don’t replicate
  • people need to care about whats being primed
  • papies - people who want to be thinner make healthier food choices after being primed with associated words e.g. diet but only works for people who want a healthy diet
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what did tan and barber find about stereotype threat

A
  • examined whether age based stereotypes impact older chinese adults
  • tested older chinese pps memory under a stereotype threat condition
  • found poorer memory recall in stereotype threat condition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is prejudice

A
  • strong, highly accessible negative attitude
  • dominated by cognitive bias and negative stereotypes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is discrimination

A

behaviour based on unjust treatment of certain groups
- reluctance to help
- tokenism
- reverse discrimination

17
Q

what did Gaetner and Dovidio find about reluctance to help in discrimination

A
  • pps were more reluctant to help a minority member than their own group when faced with an emergency but only when others were present
18
Q

what is tokenism in terms of discrimination and what did Monin and miller find about it

A
  • process of favouring a member of a minority group in isolated episodes
  • found that pps who were given the opportunity to hire a well-qualified minority candidate were willing to discriminate against other minorities in future hiring, as they had already proved that they were not prejudices
19
Q

what is reverse discrimination

A

opening displays pro-minority behaviour but as a way to deflect accusations of prejudice e.g. giving more money to a minority when feeling threatened

20
Q

what did Dovidio et al 1996 find about racism

A

decline of racist attitudes over 60 years

21
Q

what did Quillian and Lee find about discrimination 2022

A

found that hiring discrimination amongst among 170k apps for minority groups has not fallen over the past decades
- specific stereotypes changed, but negativity remains

22
Q

what is new/modern racism

A

conflict between evaluation towards out-group and values of equality and egalitarian attitudes
- a bit more implicit

23
Q

what are the three theories of subtle prejudice

A
  • modern or symbolic racism
  • ambivalent racism
  • ambivalent sexism
24
Q

what is modern or symbolic racism

A
  • blaming the victim
  • support of policies that all happen to disadvantage racial minorities
25
what is ambivalent racism
- high scores on pro-black attitudes - high scores on anti-black attitudes
26
what is ambivalent sexism
- hostile sexism paints women in a negative light - benevolent sexism could be seen as apparently positive
27
what causes prejudice
- historical/economical - linked to the psychological notion of frustration of aggression - psychological - individual differences in personality, group processes
28
what is the frustration-aggression hypothesis
dollard et al - frustration causes aggression - psychic energy built up by frustration needs an outlet - scapegoat - linked to displacement
29
what are the stages in frustration aggression
- identification of personal goals - psychic energy activated - frustration of goal achievement - source of frustration too powerful - scapegoat found; catharsis achieved by displacing aggression
30
what evidence did hovland and sears find
- study about cotton workers - over a fifty period measures; the price of cotton, number of lynchings of black workers - as frustration increased lynching's increased
31
what are authoritarian personality traits
- extreme reactions to authority figures - obsession with rank and status - tendency to displace anger - related to upbringing - harsh parental discipline
32
what evidence did adorno et al find for authoritarian personality
- interviews about childhood - questions monitoring anti-semitism, ethnocentrism, political and economic conservatism, potential for fascism - correlation between the harshness of upbringing and measures of prejudice
33
what are criticisms of the authoritarian personality explanation
- can't determine cause and effect - poor methodology - memory - ignores social context
34
what did tajfel argue about social learning
rather than personality, hatred and suspicion of certain groups are learnt in early life
35
what evidence did barret and short find about social learning
english children aged 4-5 years old - french and spanish were liked, followed by italians, germans were liked the least - due to parental prejudices - modelling and conditioning
36
what evidence did minard find about conformity
- investigated attutudes of white miners - 60% would readily switch between racism and non racism depending on whether situational norms encouraged or discouraged prejudice
37
what is the social identity theory
- we have a social identity as well as a personal one. made up of how we categorise ourselves in terms of social groups - intergroup differentiation - in group vs outgroup - depersonalisation - in group bias
38
what did hogg and vaughan find about prejudice
- school teacher jane elliot - tried to highlight effects of prejudice to school children - blue eyed were children were inferior and had to wear a collar and lost privileges - brown eyed children were very quick to derogate those blue eyes
39
what did akrami et al find
- explored whether personality or social psychology or a combination of both predicted sexism - sexism was best explained by considering the combined influence of both personality and social psychology conflicts - necessary to integrate various approaches to explain prejudice